@article{Jay, author = {Jay, Ph.}, title = {The Common Langur of North India}, series = {I. DeVore (Ed.), Primate Behavior. Field Studies of Monkeys and Apes, New York etc. (Holt, Rinehart and Winston) 1965, pp. 197-249.}, journal = {I. DeVore (Ed.), Primate Behavior. Field Studies of Monkeys and Apes, New York etc. (Holt, Rinehart and Winston) 1965, pp. 197-249.}, language = {en} } @article{Jay, author = {Jay, Martin}, title = {The Institut f{\"u}r Sozialforschung and the Origins of Critical Sociology}, series = {The Human Factor, Vol. 8 (No. 2, SPR 1969), pp. 6-18.}, journal = {The Human Factor, Vol. 8 (No. 2, SPR 1969), pp. 6-18.}, language = {en} } @article{Jay, author = {Jay, Martin}, title = {How Utopian is Marcuse?}, series = {Fischer, G. (Ed.): The Revival of American Socialism, New York (Oxford University Press) 1971, pp. 244-256.}, journal = {Fischer, G. (Ed.): The Revival of American Socialism, New York (Oxford University Press) 1971, pp. 244-256.}, language = {en} } @article{Jay, author = {Jay, Martin}, title = {The Franfurt School's Critique of Marxist Humanism}, series = {Social Research, New York, Vol. 39 (1972), pp. 285-305.}, journal = {Social Research, New York, Vol. 39 (1972), pp. 285-305.}, abstract = {The prevalent interpretation of the work of the Frankfurt Sch has been that it can be placed squarely in the camp of the Marxist Humanists. This view is challenged in an examination of the views of H. Marcuse, E. FROMM, T. W. Adorno, and M. Horkheimer, some of whom might classify as humanist Marxists, others not. By refusing to rest its entire theoretical position on the foundation stone of labor and by rejecting the total soc'ization of the world as a desideratum, the Frankfurt Sch expressed perhaps its key anti-metaphysical insight: the rejection of identity theory, whether idealistic or materialist. By identity theory is meant the belief that the ultimate oneness of subject and object, essence and appearance, particular and universal underlies the contradictions of the apparent world either inherently or potentially. Critical theory's rejection of this assumption was the primary reason why it could not be included among the variants of Marxist Humanism. Horkheimer and Adorno were hostile to the identity theory from the beginning, while Marcuse was far less so. It was this rejection of identity theory which underlay their hesitation about reducing culture to a function of the priority of labor. Psychoanalytic theory, particularly Freudianism, may have contributed to the Frankfurt Sch's distance from Marxist Humanism. The Sch came increasingly to see S. Freud as a bulwark against the false identity which threatened man in the post-World War II period. To Horkheimer and Adorno, writing in the 1960's, contingent man, not species man, was the real locus of human freedom. But absolute isolation and absolute solidarity were equally anathema. The individual was always to be understood as mediated through the non-identical totality, never as an end-point in himself. The Frankfurt Sch preserved the hope of a more truly humane society inhabited by concrete men rather than by the abstract subjects of the humanists, with whom they have so often been confused.}, language = {en} } @article{Jay, author = {Jay, Martin}, title = {The Frankfurt School and the Genesis of Critical Theory}, series = {Howard, D., Klare, K. E. (Eds.): The Unknown Dimension. European Marxism since Lenin, New York/London (Basic Books) 1972, pp. 225-248.}, journal = {Howard, D., Klare, K. E. (Eds.): The Unknown Dimension. European Marxism since Lenin, New York/London (Basic Books) 1972, pp. 225-248.}, language = {en} } @article{Jay, author = {Jay, Martin}, title = {The Dialectical Imagination. A History of the Frankfurt School and the Institute of Social Research 1923-1950, London (Heinemann Educational Books) 1973, pp. 86-112.}, language = {en} } @article{Jay, author = {Jay, Martin}, title = {Positive und negative Totalit{\"a}t. Adornos Alternativentwurf zur interdisziplin{\"a}ren Forschung}, series = {W. Bonss and N. Schindler (Eds.), Sozialforschung als Kritik. Zum sozialwissenschaftlichen Potential der Kritischen Theorie, Frankfurt (Suhrkamp Taschenbuch Wissenschaft, stw 400) 1982, pp. 67-86.}, journal = {W. Bonss and N. Schindler (Eds.), Sozialforschung als Kritik. Zum sozialwissenschaftlichen Potential der Kritischen Theorie, Frankfurt (Suhrkamp Taschenbuch Wissenschaft, stw 400) 1982, pp. 67-86.}, language = {de} } @article{Jay, author = {Jay, Martin}, title = {Onko kokemus edelleen kriisiss{\"a}? Ajatuksia Frankfurtin koulun kaihosta}, series = {O.-P. Moisio (Ed.), Kritiikin Lupaus. Nakokulmia Frankfurtin koulun kriittiseen teoriaan, Jyvaeskylaen (SoPhi Publisher) 1999, pp. 177-196.}, journal = {O.-P. Moisio (Ed.), Kritiikin Lupaus. Nakokulmia Frankfurtin koulun kriittiseen teoriaan, Jyvaeskylaen (SoPhi Publisher) 1999, pp. 177-196.}, language = {fi} } @article{Jay, author = {Jay, Martin}, title = {Die Antisemitismusanalyse der Kritischen Theorie,}, series = {M. Boll und R. Gross (Ed.), Die Frankfurter Schule und Frankfurt. Eine R{\"u}ckkehr nach Deutschland, Frankfurt (Wallstein) 2009, pp. 136-149,}, journal = {M. Boll und R. Gross (Ed.), Die Frankfurter Schule und Frankfurt. Eine R{\"u}ckkehr nach Deutschland, Frankfurt (Wallstein) 2009, pp. 136-149,}, language = {de} } @article{Kwawer, author = {Kwawer, Jay S.}, title = {A Case Seminar with Erich Fromm}, series = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, New York (The Academic Press, Inc.), Vol. 11 (1975), pp. 453-455.}, journal = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, New York (The Academic Press, Inc.), Vol. 11 (1975), pp. 453-455.}, language = {en} } @article{Kwawer, author = {Kwawer, Jay S.}, title = {Fromm on Clinical Psychoanalysis}, series = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, New York (William Alanson White Institute), Vol. 27 (No. 4, October 1991), pp. 608-623.}, journal = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, New York (William Alanson White Institute), Vol. 27 (No. 4, October 1991), pp. 608-623.}, abstract = {Classical psychoanalysis (Freud) and self-psychology (Kohut) proceed on the assumption that there are different relationship patterns and solutions to conflicts between the generations. The Oedipus myth and the Odyssey portray divergent fatherson relationships and their effects on the following generation. In the story of Oedipus, where Freud sees represented the central human conflict, Laius is prepared to kill his son Oedipus for the sake of his own survival. Here the conflict between the generations is to be solved by murder. In the Odyssey, Kohut finds a father-son relationship that shows the alternative model of understanding which is used by self-psychology. Odysseus protects his son Telemachus while putting his own life at stake. There is no wish to murder. On the contrary, the good father-son relationship fosters intrafamilial affiliation and sustains intergenerational continuity. The effects of these different conflict solution patterns either weaken (Laius-Oedipus) or strengthen (Odysseus-Telemachus) the following generation. The divergent basic patterns of intergenerational relationships are questioned with regard to the development of the psychoanalytic societies: Is Freud our Laius or our Odysseus?}, language = {en} } @article{Kwawer, author = {Kwawer, Jay S.}, title = {Sein Hauptinteresse: die Leidenschaften des Menschen}, series = {R. Funk (Ed.), Erich Fromm als Therapeut. Fr{\"u}here Sch{\"u}ler erinnern sich an seine Praxis der Psychoanalyse, Gießen (Psychosozial-Verlag) 2009.}, journal = {R. Funk (Ed.), Erich Fromm als Therapeut. Fr{\"u}here Sch{\"u}ler erinnern sich an seine Praxis der Psychoanalyse, Gießen (Psychosozial-Verlag) 2009.}, language = {de} } @article{Kwawer, author = {Kwawer, Jay S.}, title = {His Main Interest: The Human Passions}, series = {R. Funk (Ed.), The Clinical Erich Fromm. Personal Accounts and Papers on Therapeutic Technique, Amsterdam and New York (Rodopi Publisher), 2009, pp. 135-136.}, journal = {R. Funk (Ed.), The Clinical Erich Fromm. Personal Accounts and Papers on Therapeutic Technique, Amsterdam and New York (Rodopi Publisher), 2009, pp. 135-136.}, language = {en} } @article{Kwawer, author = {Kwawer, Jay S.}, title = {Lo que m{\´a}s le interesaba: las pasiones humanas}, series = {R. Funk (Ed.), Recordando a Erich Fromm. Testimonios de sus alumnos sobre el hombre y el terapeuta. Edici{\´o}n a cargo de Rainer Funk, Barcelona - Buenos Aires - M{\´e}xico (Paid{\´o}s, Paid{\´o}s Contextos 204), 2011, pp. 189-191. [Spanish by Fernando Borrajo]}, journal = {R. Funk (Ed.), Recordando a Erich Fromm. Testimonios de sus alumnos sobre el hombre y el terapeuta. Edici{\´o}n a cargo de Rainer Funk, Barcelona - Buenos Aires - M{\´e}xico (Paid{\´o}s, Paid{\´o}s Contextos 204), 2011, pp. 189-191. [Spanish by Fernando Borrajo]}, language = {es} } @article{Kwaweretal, author = {Kwawer, Jay S. and et al.,}, title = {What Cures: The Therapeutic Action of Psychoanalysis (A Symposium)}, series = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, New York (William Alanson White Psychoanalytic Society), Vol. 21 (1985), pp. 325-332.}, journal = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, New York (William Alanson White Psychoanalytic Society), Vol. 21 (1985), pp. 325-332.}, language = {en} } @book{WashburnJay, author = {Washburn, S. L. P. C. and Jay,}, title = {Perspectives on human evolution, New York, et al. (Holt, Rinehart and Winston) 1968.}, language = {en} } @article{Jay, author = {Jay, Martin}, title = {Dialektische Phantasie. Die Geschichte der Frankfurter Schule und des Instituts f{\"u}r Sozialforschung 1923-1950, Frankfurt (S. Fischer Verlag) 1976, pp. 113-142. [= JAY, M., 1973.]}, number = {translation / {\"U}bersetzung}, language = {de} } @article{Kwawer, author = {Kwawer, Jay S.}, title = {Book Review. James E. Goggin and Eileen Brockman Goggin, Death of >Jewish Science<: Psychoanalysis in the Third Reich.}, series = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 39 (2003), pp. 299-323.}, journal = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 39 (2003), pp. 299-323.}, language = {en} } @article{Kwawer, author = {Kwawer, Jay S.}, title = {Some Interpersonal Aspects of Self-Mutilation in a Borderline Patient}, series = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 08 (1980), pp. 203-216.}, journal = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 08 (1980), pp. 203-216.}, language = {en} } @article{Kwawer, author = {Kwawer, Jay S.}, title = {Symposium. >What cures: The therapeutic action of psychoanalysis<: Thoughts on reality as a therapeutic agent.}, series = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 21 (1985), pp. 325-332.}, journal = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 21 (1985), pp. 325-332.}, language = {en} } @article{Kwawer, author = {Kwawer, Jay S.}, title = {Developmental Perspectives in Fromm's Psychoanalysis: A Response to Biancoli.}, series = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 38 (2002), pp. 623-634.}, journal = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 38 (2002), pp. 623-634.}, language = {en} } @misc{Lefer, author = {Lefer, Jay}, title = {Review Michael H. Stone: The Borderline Syndromes}, series = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 10 (1982), pp. 159-160.}, journal = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 10 (1982), pp. 159-160.}, language = {en} } @misc{Lefer, author = {Lefer, Jay}, title = {Review Bruce Fink: Fundamentals of Psychoanalytic Technique: A Lacanian Approach for Practioners}, series = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 36 (2008), pp. 767-768.}, journal = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 36 (2008), pp. 767-768.}, language = {en} } @misc{Lefer, author = {Lefer, Jay}, title = {Review Ilany Kogan: The Struggle Against Mourning}, series = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 37 (2009), pp. 395-397.}, journal = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 37 (2009), pp. 395-397.}, language = {en} } @misc{Lefer, author = {Lefer, Jay}, title = {Review M. Berlin (Ed.): Poets On Prozac: Mental Illness, Treatment, and the Creative Process}, series = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 37 (2009), pp. 403-404.}, journal = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 37 (2009), pp. 403-404.}, language = {en} } @misc{Lefer, author = {Lefer, Jay}, title = {Review Isabel Alvarez Borland and Lunette M. F. Bosch (Eds.): Cuban-American Literature and Art: Negotiating Identities}, series = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 38 (2010), pp.545. 543}, journal = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 38 (2010), pp.545. 543}, language = {en} } @misc{Lefer, author = {Lefer, Jay}, title = {Review Dana Birkted-Breen, Sara Flanders, and Alain Gibeault (Eds.): Reading French Psychoanalysis}, series = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 39 (2011), pp. 396-399.}, journal = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 39 (2011), pp. 396-399.}, language = {en} } @article{Lefer, author = {Lefer, Jay}, title = {Review Otto Kernberg: The Inseparable Nature of Love and Aggression - Clinical and Theoretical Perspectives}, series = {Psychodynamic Psychiatry, Vol. 40 (2012), pp. 693-695-}, journal = {Psychodynamic Psychiatry, Vol. 40 (2012), pp. 693-695-}, language = {en} } @misc{Lefer, author = {Lefer, Jay}, title = {Review Sheila Klebanow: Changing Concepts in Psychoanalysis}, series = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 11 (1983), pp. 467-468.}, journal = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 11 (1983), pp. 467-468.}, language = {en} } @misc{Lefer, author = {Lefer, Jay}, title = {Review J. Sandler with Anna Freud: The Analysis of Defense: The Ego and the Mechanisms of Defense Revisited}, series = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 15 (1987), pp. 113-115.}, journal = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 15 (1987), pp. 113-115.}, language = {en} } @misc{Lefer, author = {Lefer, Jay}, title = {Review Ellen Handler Spitz: Art and Psyche}, series = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 15 (1987), pp. 271-272.}, journal = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 15 (1987), pp. 271-272.}, language = {en} } @misc{Lefer, author = {Lefer, Jay}, title = {Review Joseph Masling (Ed.): Empirical Studies of Psychoanalytic Theories, Volume 2}, series = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 16 (1988), pp. 402-404.}, journal = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 16 (1988), pp. 402-404.}, language = {en} } @misc{Lefer, author = {Lefer, Jay}, title = {Review Sidney Hook (Ed.):Psychoanalysis, Scientific Method, and Philosophy}, series = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 20 (1992), pp. 317-318.}, journal = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 20 (1992), pp. 317-318.}, language = {en} } @misc{Lefer, author = {Lefer, Jay}, title = {Review Ellen Handler Spitz: Museums of the Mind}, series = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 23 (1995), pp. 753-754.}, journal = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 23 (1995), pp. 753-754.}, language = {en} } @misc{Lefer, author = {Lefer, Jay}, title = {Review Ellen Handler Spitz: Inside Picture Books}, series = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 28 (2000), pp. 749-752.}, journal = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 28 (2000), pp. 749-752.}, language = {en} } @misc{Lefer, author = {Lefer, Jay}, title = {Review Theodore Millon, Paul H. Blaney and Roger D. Davis (Eds.): Oxford Textbook of Psychopathology}, series = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 29 (2001), pp. 521-522.}, journal = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 29 (2001), pp. 521-522.}, language = {en} } @article{Lefer, author = {Lefer, Jay}, title = {The Psychoanalyst at the Medical Bedside}, series = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 34 (2006), pp. 075-082.}, journal = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 34 (2006), pp. 075-082.}, language = {en} } @misc{Lefer, author = {Lefer, Jay}, title = {Review Jerome Oremland: Death and the Fear ofFiniteness in Hamlet}, series = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 34 (2006), pp. 563-365.}, journal = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 34 (2006), pp. 563-365.}, language = {en} } @article{Frankel, author = {Frankel, Jay}, title = {Rothstein as a Self and Object Freudian: Commentary on Paper by Arnold Rothstein}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 12 (2002), pp. 101-139.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 12 (2002), pp. 101-139.}, abstract = {When we feel overwhelmed by an inescapable threat, we >identify with the aggressor< (Ferenczi, 1933). Hoping to survive, we sense and >become< precisely what the attacker expects of us - in our behavior, perceptions, emotions, and thoughts. Identification with the aggressor is closely coordinated with other responses to trauma, including dissociation. Over the long run, it can become habitual and can lead to masochism, chronic hypervigilance, and other personality distortions. But habitual identification with the aggressor also frequently occurs in people who have not suffered severe trauma, which raises the possibility that certain events not generally considered to constitute trauma are often experienced as traumatic. Following Ferenczi, I suggest that emotional abandonment or isolation, and being subject to a greater power, are such events. In addition, identification with the aggressor is a tactic typical of people in a weak position as such, it plays an important role in social interaction in general.}, language = {en} } @article{Frankel, author = {Frankel, Jay}, title = {Reply to commentaries}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 10 (2000), pp. 327-334.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 10 (2000), pp. 327-334.}, language = {en} } @article{Frankel, author = {Frankel, Jay}, title = {Self psychology and projective identification - whither shall they meet - a. Reply to the editors (1995)}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 12 (2002), pp. 159-170.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 12 (2002), pp. 159-170.}, abstract = {To anchor my response to three issues raised by Berman and Bonomi, I rely on Ferenczi's concept of >traumatic aloneness.< First, I agree with both discussants that identification often has constructive and life-creating effects, but I suggest that it may generally arise in response to (sometimes hidden) anxiety, specifically about separation or aloneness. Second, I examine what Ferenczi termed >introjection of the guilt feelings of the adult< - trauma victims frequently feel that they are >bad< - and explore this complex feeling both as an effort to preserve others as good objects and as a way to protect oneself from a frightening aggressor. Finally, I consider the idea that trauma leads to partial psychic death. While I think it is clinically dangerous to assume that trauma can cause the actual, permanent destruction of part of the personality - this assumption can lead to unwarranted therapeutic pessimism - trauma certainly often carries the subjective experience of partial death or dying. The therapeutic effort to undo dissociations and achieve authenticity and intimacy can be thought of as rediscovering one's aliveness through the process of sharing it with someone.}, language = {en} } @article{Frankel, author = {Frankel, Jay}, title = {The influence of culture on the self and selfobject relationships: An asian-north american comparison}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 13 (2003), pp. 513-520.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 13 (2003), pp. 513-520.}, abstract = {It is important for every treatment that we analysts feel some room for our own subjectivity and some recognition of this from our patients. But we may feel that our analytic ideals - part of what may be called our >preexisting analytic third<: our analytic inheritance - require that we expunge our subjectivity from view. A submissive attitude toward the preexisting third may result in our committing misdemeanors in an attempt to salvage some feeling of psychic existence in a treatment where we feel negated. We can also think of a different kind of analytic third - an >emergent third< - that is mutually created by the analytic couple. This kind of third can be a platform from which to develop a necessary active, independent, and critical stance toward that which we inherit. The emergent third can find expression through the play structures that may come to shape the analytic relationship. Misdemeanors, therefore, may reflect analysts' inevitably taking on certain roles in the unconscious, restitutive, and often sadomasochistic, scenarios that patients may play out in their analyses. The possible therapeutic value of playing out these scenarios - a possibility suggested by Grand's case material - tends to undermine a clear distinction between freely surrendering to a creative analytic process, and submitting in a self-negating, though potentially helpful, way.}, language = {en} } @article{Frankel, author = {Frankel, Jay B.}, title = {Kohut's contribution}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 08 (1998), pp. 149-182.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 08 (1998), pp. 149-182.}, abstract = {Analytic child therapy techniques developed as modifications of techniques from adult psychoanalysis. Child therapy continues to be regarded as an adaptation of adult analysis and to give a central place to the methods and conditions of adult analysis, such as interpretation, in its understanding of how therapy heals. I propose that child therapy is not a modified form of therapy and that the essential processes of therapy are fully present in child therapy. In fact, they often may be seen more clearly there than in adult therapy. I suggest two interrelated processes as the essential ones in all analytic therapy. The first is play. I examine several interrelated aspects of play, specifically as they occur in child therapy. These include the emergence and integration of dissociated self-states, symbolization, and recognition. The second process I propose as essential in analytic therapy is the renegotiation of self - other relationships through action. This renegotiation is what can help patients become able to play in therapy when they have difficulty doing so. Since I suggest that action is at the heart of analytic therapy, I go on to consider the role of talking in an action therapy. Finally, I explore the dimensions of mutuality in the relationship between child and therapist, including mutual influence and regulation, mutual recognition, and mutual regression. The intersubjective nature of psychotherapy, which is increasingly appreciated in adult analytic therapy but not in child therapy, provides a fertile context for the evolution of play and for the productive renegotiation of self - other relationships.}, language = {en} } @article{Greenberg, author = {Greenberg, Jay}, title = {Ideology Springs Eternal: Reply to Commentaries}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 07 (1997), pp. 337-340.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 07 (1997), pp. 337-340.}, language = {en} } @article{Greenberg, author = {Greenberg, Jay}, title = {Listening to the Erotic Commentary on Paper by Eric Sherman}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 08 (1998), pp. 217-224.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 08 (1998), pp. 217-224.}, language = {en} } @article{Greenberg, author = {Greenberg, Jay}, title = {Analytic authority and analytic restraint.}, series = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 35 (1999), pp. 025-042.}, journal = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 35 (1999), pp. 025-042.}, language = {en} } @article{Greenberg, author = {Greenberg, Jay}, title = {Foreword.}, series = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 39 (2003), pp. 353-360.}, journal = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 39 (2003), pp. 353-360.}, language = {en} } @article{Greenberg, author = {Greenberg, Jay}, title = {Afterword.}, series = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 39 (2003), pp. 531.}, journal = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 39 (2003), pp. 531.}, language = {en} } @article{Greenberg, author = {Greenberg, Jay R.}, title = {Discussion of M.F. Basch >The interpersonal and the intrapsychic: Conflict or harmony?<}, series = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 23 (1987), pp. 391-399.}, journal = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 23 (1987), pp. 391-399.}, language = {en} } @article{Greenberg, author = {Greenberg, Jay R.}, title = {>Dirty,< >Clean,< and In-Between - Rolling with Uncertainty in Homoerotic Countertransference. Reply to Commentaries}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 01 (1991), pp. 052-073.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 01 (1991), pp. 052-073.}, abstract = {The psychoanalytic situation provides many opportunities for people to observe their analysts closely. These observations are inevitably woven into the fabric of patients' transference experience. Because the observations can be uncomfortable for the analyst, there is a constant temptation to ignore or deny the plausibility of patients' perceptions. They can be, and often are, quickly reinterpreted as derivatives of sexual or aggressive urges. Psychoanalytic drive theory, with its emphasis on impulse rather than observation as the force behind transference experience, can encourage counter-transferential disclaimers and lead to blind spots. Some technical suggestions are offered to avoid this tendency and are based on a relational understanding of the nature of transference.}, language = {en} } @article{Greenberg, author = {Greenberg, Jay R.}, title = {Discussion: Toward a social-constructivist view of the psychoanalytic situation}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 05 (1995), pp. 317-324.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 05 (1995), pp. 317-324.}, language = {en} } @article{Greenberg, author = {Greenberg, Jay}, title = {An Appreciation of the Contribution of Louis Sander}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 02 (1992), pp. 529-537.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 02 (1992), pp. 529-537.}, language = {en} } @article{Greenberg, author = {Greenberg, Jay}, title = {Editorial.}, series = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 31 (1995), pp. 005-008.}, journal = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 31 (1995), pp. 005-008.}, language = {en} } @article{Greenberg, author = {Greenberg, Jay}, title = {Self-disclosure: Is it psychoanalysis?}, series = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 31 (1995), pp. 193-205.}, journal = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 31 (1995), pp. 193-205.}, language = {en} } @book{Jay, author = {Jay, Martin}, title = {Dialektische Phantasie. Die Geschichte der Frankfurter Schule und des Instituts f{\"u}r Sozialforschung 1923-1950, Frankfurt (S. Fischer Verlag) 1976.}, number = {translation / {\"U}bersetzung}, language = {de} } @misc{Lefer, author = {Lefer, Jay}, title = {Review Peter I. Rudnytsky and Ellen Handler Spitz: Freud and Forbidden Knowledge}, series = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, New York and London (The Guildford Press), Vol. 23 (No. 1, Spring 1995), pp. 170-172.}, journal = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, New York and London (The Guildford Press), Vol. 23 (No. 1, Spring 1995), pp. 170-172.}, language = {en} } @article{BermanFrankel, author = {Berman, Emanuel and Frankel, Jay}, title = {Remember Where You Come From: Dissociative Process in Multicultural Individuals}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 10 (2000), pp. 267-270.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 10 (2000), pp. 267-270.}, language = {en} } @article{Greenberg, author = {Greenberg, Jay}, title = {Therapeutic Action and the Analyst's Responsibility}, series = {Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, Vol. 63 (No. 1, February 2015), pp. 15-32.}, journal = {Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, Vol. 63 (No. 1, February 2015), pp. 15-32.}, abstract = {Models of the psychoanalytic situation can usefully be thought of as fictions. Viewed this way, the models can be understood as narrative structures that shape what we are able to see and how we are able to think about what happens between us and our analysands. Theories of therapeutic action are elements of what can be called a >controlling fiction<, mediating between these theories and our very real responsibilities, both to our preferred method and to a suffering patient. This venture into comparative psychoanalysis is illustrated by a discussion of published case material.}, language = {en} } @book{Greenberg, author = {Greenberg, Jay R.}, title = {Oedipus and Beyond. A Clinical Theory. Cambridge, MA (Harvard University Press) 1991.}, language = {en} } @book{GreenbergMitchell, author = {Greenberg, Jay R. and Mitchell, Stephen A.}, title = {Object Relations in Psychoanalytic Theory. Cambridge, MA (Harvard University Press) 1983.}, language = {en} } @misc{FrankelDimitrijevic, author = {Frankel, Jay B. and Dimitrijevic, Aleksandar}, title = {>Being myself as the analyst I have become:< An interview with Jay B. Frankel by Aleksandar Dimitrijevic}, series = {International Forum of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 32 (No. 1, 2023), pp. 040-061.}, journal = {International Forum of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 32 (No. 1, 2023), pp. 040-061.}, language = {en} } @article{JayGeng, author = {Jay, Martin and Geng, Hongming}, title = {>Psychoanalysis is Nothing but an Exaggeration< - Freud and the Frankfurt School [>精神分析只不过是夸大其辞<——弗洛伊德与法兰克福学派]}, series = {Journal of Guangzhou University (Social Science Edition) [广州大学学报(社会科学版)], No. 6 (2020), pp. 34-46.}, journal = {Journal of Guangzhou University (Social Science Edition) [广州大学学报(社会科学版)], No. 6 (2020), pp. 34-46.}, abstract = {法兰克福学派不断尝试着丰富对现代社会的批判,这主要建立在这样的基础上——借鉴精神分析的观念,对那种名为>批判理论<的马克思主义,进行一种想象性重读。尽管恩里希·弗洛姆、马克斯·霍克海默、赫伯特·马尔库塞和西奥多·阿多诺的具体看法不同,但他们都支持对马克思和弗洛伊德进行创造性整合。法兰克福学派尤其爱用弗洛伊德的理论阐释如下事实——工人阶级的假想革命任务的失败,未曾预期的法西斯主义的兴起和构想乌托邦种种可能的形式。除此之外,阿多诺的作品更明显地利用了精神分析的唯物主义冲动,去反对在唯心主义传统中的意识哲学。}, language = {zh} } @article{Jay, author = {Jay, Martin}, title = {Integracja psychoanalizy i marksizmu - przypadek Ericha Fromma [Integration of Psychoanalysis and Marxism - the Case of Erich Fromm]}, series = {Paweł Jabłoński and Rafał Włodarczyk (Eds.): Fromm - aplikacje, Wrocław (>Chiasm< Publishing Initiative) Poland 2016, pp. 179-204.}, journal = {Paweł Jabłoński and Rafał Włodarczyk (Eds.): Fromm - aplikacje, Wrocław (>Chiasm< Publishing Initiative) Poland 2016, pp. 179-204.}, language = {pl} } @misc{FrommJay, author = {Fromm, Erich and Jay, Martin}, title = {Martin Jay interviews Erich Fromm on November 29, 1968, in California in preparation of his book >Dialectic Imagination<. The questions Jay sent in advance to Fromm by a letter dated November 13, 1968.}, number = {transcription / Transkript}, language = {en} }