@article{Hirsch, author = {Hirsch, Irwin}, title = {The Rediscovery of the Advantages of the Participant-Observation Model}, series = {Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought, Vol. 8 (No. 3, 1985) pp. 441-459.}, journal = {Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought, Vol. 8 (No. 3, 1985) pp. 441-459.}, language = {en} } @article{Hirsch, author = {Hirsch, Irwin}, title = {Varying modes of analytic participation}, series = {Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 15 (No. 2, 1987), pp. 205-222.}, journal = {Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 15 (No. 2, 1987), pp. 205-222.}, language = {en} } @article{Hirsch, author = {Hirsch, Irwin}, title = {The Participant-Observation Model: The Analyst's Unwitting Participation in the Transference. Typescript, 13 pp.}, series = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 32 (No. 3, 1996), pp. 359-383.}, journal = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 32 (No. 3, 1996), pp. 359-383.}, language = {en} } @article{Hirsch, author = {Hirsch, Irwin}, title = {Sexual Disorders: A Perspective}, series = {The American Journal of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 46 (1986), pp. 239-248.}, journal = {The American Journal of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 46 (1986), pp. 239-248.}, language = {en} } @article{Hirsch, author = {Hirsch, Irwin}, title = {Countertransference and participant observation}, series = {The American Journal of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 50 (1990), pp. 275-284.}, journal = {The American Journal of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 50 (1990), pp. 275-284.}, language = {en} } @article{Hirsch, author = {Hirsch, Irwin}, title = {Beyond Essentialism and Constructivism: Commentary on Paper by Cynthia Dyess and Tim Dean}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 03 (1993), pp. 395-399.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 03 (1993), pp. 395-399.}, language = {en} } @article{Hirsch, author = {Hirsch, Irwin}, title = {Being Bad on the Side. Commentary on Paper by Eric Sherman}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 03 (1993), pp. 343-366.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 03 (1993), pp. 343-366.}, abstract = {Beyond the inevitability of countertransference feelings is the question of countertransference enactments. From a two-person, participant-observer or observing-participant perspective, enactments are inevitable. The analyst becomes influenced by the patient (and influences the patient as well) and enmeshed in the patient's internalized interpersonal configurations. Analysis works not by avoiding such action but by analyzing from within the interactional system. Analysts who are different from one another become engaged in different ways, since the person of the analyst is a significant variable. This article, using case examples, explores two analyst-related variables, age and family configuration, to expand the examination of countertransference enactments and some effects on the analytic process.}, language = {en} } @article{Hirsch, author = {Hirsch, Irwin}, title = {Clinton and the Empty Self}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 04 (1994), pp. 171-192.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 04 (1994), pp. 171-192.}, abstract = {The analyst's countertransference feelings of love, particularly sexual love, have been subject to minimal examination in the literature. In this era of expanding psychoanalytical models, it appears that some theories of therapeutic action lend themselves more to addressing such themes than do others. There is always considerable overlap among psychoanalytic models, although there are nonetheless some clear differences in the way countertransference affect is experienced, filtered, and utilized.}, language = {en} } @article{Hirsch, author = {Hirsch, Irwin}, title = {The Widening of the Concept of Dissociation}, series = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 25 (1997), pp. 603-616.}, journal = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 25 (1997), pp. 603-616.}, language = {en} } @article{Hirsch, author = {Hirsch, Irwin}, title = {Discussion of Frawley-O'Dea and Sarnat: Emotional and Interactional Factors in the Supervisory Relationship}, series = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 26 (1998), pp. 545-552.}, journal = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 26 (1998), pp. 545-552.}, language = {en} } @article{Hirsch, author = {Hirsch, Irwin}, title = {Men's Love for Men: Contrasting Classical American Film with The Crying Game}, series = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 27 (1999), pp. 151-166.}, journal = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 27 (1999), pp. 151-166.}, language = {en} } @article{Hirsch, author = {Hirsch, Irwin}, title = {Interview with Benjamin Wolstein.}, series = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 36 (2000), pp. 187-232.}, journal = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 36 (2000), pp. 187-232.}, language = {en} } @article{Hirsch, author = {Hirsch, Irwin}, title = {Alone yet connected: Response to the discussion.}, series = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 36 (2000), pp. 289-300.}, journal = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 36 (2000), pp. 289-300.}, language = {en} } @article{Hirsch, author = {Hirsch, Irwin}, title = {Reply to Mitchell}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 11 (2001), pp. 115-126.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 11 (2001), pp. 115-126.}, abstract = {Every new theoretical development in psychoanalysis tends to lead to counter trends or calls for a return to a more pure version of analysis. Some critics of psychoanalysis' relational turn view this theorizing as excessively interpersonal, using the most literal definition of this latter perspective - psychoanalysis as simply an I - Thou relationship between two conscious people. Jeanne Wolff Bernstein, for example, starts with the assumption that unconscious minds can be studied independently from those persons engaged in the study. It then follows for such critics that, in interpersonal/relational analytic action, the person of the analyst has become too central and intrusive in the process, obscuring the examination of patients' unconscious mind.}, language = {en} } @article{Hirsch, author = {Hirsch, Irwin}, title = {Beyond Interpretation: Analytic Interaction in the Interpersonal Tradition.}, series = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 38 (2002), pp. 573-588.}, journal = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 38 (2002), pp. 573-588.}, language = {en} } @article{Hirsch, author = {Hirsch, Irwin}, title = {An Illustration of the Irreducible Subjectivity in Interpreting Data - Clinical or Written: A Reply to Philip Bromberg}, series = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 30 (2002), pp. 621-632.}, journal = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 30 (2002), pp. 621-632.}, language = {en} } @article{Hirsch, author = {Hirsch, Irwin}, title = {Interpersonal Psychoanalysis' Radical Fa{\c{c}}ade}, series = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 30 (2002), pp. 595-604.}, journal = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 30 (2002), pp. 595-604.}, language = {en} } @article{Hirsch, author = {Hirsch, Irwin}, title = {Female-Male, Doctor-Patient: Discussion of Seward.}, series = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 39 (2003), pp. 223-232.}, journal = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 39 (2003), pp. 223-232.}, language = {en} } @article{Hirsch, author = {Hirsch, Irwin}, title = {Reflections on Clinical Issues in the Context of the National Trauma of September 11.}, series = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 39 (2003), pp. 665-682.}, journal = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 39 (2003), pp. 665-682.}, language = {en} } @article{Hirsch, author = {Hirsch, Irwin}, title = {A response to Davies (but not the last word)}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 02 (1992), pp. 191-203.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 02 (1992), pp. 191-203.}, language = {en} }