@book{Hammond, author = {Hammond, G. B.}, title = {Man in Estrangement. A Comparison of the Thought of Paul Tillich and Erich Fromm, 2nd edition, Charlotte 1967.}, language = {en} } @article{Hammond, author = {Hammond, G. B.}, title = {Patriarchy and the Protestant Conscience: A Critique}, series = {Journal of Religion and Ethics, Knoxville Vol. 9 (Spring 1981), pp. 84-102.}, journal = {Journal of Religion and Ethics, Knoxville Vol. 9 (Spring 1981), pp. 84-102.}, abstract = {The author examines the views of several theorists associated with the Frankfurt School of Social Research on the subject of the authoritarian character. Attention is given first to differing assessments of the contribution of the partriarchal family to morality and individuality. Conflicting views of the Protestant conscience are then examined. The conclusion is drawn that the Frankfurt theorists differ significantly in their evaluations of patriarchal morality and religion, and in their approaches to matriarchy as an alternative pattern.}, language = {en} } @article{Hammond, author = {Hammond, G. B.}, title = {The Conscience-less Society and Beyond: Perspectives from Erich Fromm and Paul Tillich}, series = {Neue Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie, Berlin Vol. 25 (1983), pp. 20-32.}, journal = {Neue Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie, Berlin Vol. 25 (1983), pp. 20-32.}, abstract = {Recent discussions of the dominant Western character-type have focused on the decline of patriarchal conscience. The author compares Erich FROMM and Paul Tillich on these themes: characteristics of the bourgeois Protestant patriarchal conscience; the significance of its decline; and prescribed paths beyond it. Both regard the bourgeois Protestant type as unstable, needing either a regressive or a progressive solution to isolation. FROMM's progressive solution is humanistic conscience, returning to matriarchy on a higher level. Tillich sees FROMM's >human nature< as abstract; he seeks instead a connection between tradition and criticism, showing that patriarchy becomes self-critical in patriarchal religion. Like FROMM he restores matriarchy in his religion of grace.}, language = {en} } @article{Hammond, author = {Hammond, G. B.}, title = {Erich Fromm: The Courage to Be Human. A Review Article}, series = {Perspectives in Religious Studies, Macon (Georgia) Vol. 12 (No. 2, 1985), pp. 153-158 (Mercer University Press).}, journal = {Perspectives in Religious Studies, Macon (Georgia) Vol. 12 (No. 2, 1985), pp. 153-158 (Mercer University Press).}, abstract = {An assessment of Rainer Funk's account of Erich FROMM's career and publications. The strengths of Funk's book lie in its treatment of FROMM's intellectual roots, and in its analyses of FROMM's social character theory and of his interpretation of humanistic ethics and religion. Its weaknesses are its inadequate critique of FROMM's relation to Freud and its failure to deal with FROMM's role in the Frankfurt School. Evaluates Funk's approach to FROMM's >having/being alternative<. Argues that FROMM failed to develop a completely adequate treatment of individualization, and that Funk missed the opportunity to clarify FROMM's position on this issue.}, language = {en} } @misc{Hammond, author = {Hammond, G. B.}, title = {Man in Estrangement. A Comparison of the Thought of Paul Tillich and Erich Fromm (= The Idea of Self-Estrangement in the Thought of Erich Fromm and Paul Tillich), Vanderbilt University Dissertation 1962, 2nd ed. Charlotte 1967, 194 pp.}, language = {en} }