@article{Yao, author = {Yao, Dazhi}, title = {The Ideology Theory of Western Marxism [方马克思主义的意识形态理论]}, series = {[Contemporary Foreign Marxism Research Conference], July 2000, Shanghai, China, in [Proceedings]: Contemporary Foreign Marxist Review (First Series), The Journal of the Center for Contemporary Marxism Abroad (Fudan University)[当代国外马克思主义评论(第一辑)], No. 1 (07.01.2000), 109-124, 344-345.}, journal = {[Contemporary Foreign Marxism Research Conference], July 2000, Shanghai, China, in [Proceedings]: Contemporary Foreign Marxist Review (First Series), The Journal of the Center for Contemporary Marxism Abroad (Fudan University)[当代国外马克思主义评论(第一辑)], No. 1 (07.01.2000), 109-124, 344-345.}, abstract = {This paper gives a summary of the ideology theory of Western Marxism. There are four main parts in this paper. The first, it is on the essence of ideology, the main thoughts of three representatives Althusser, Luk{\´a}cs, Habermas, are introduced . Both Althusser and Luk{\´a}cs oppose ideology to science, but Althusser affirms science and criticize ideology, and Luk{\´a}cs reverse it. Habermas' thought is different from them, he identifies the science with ideology. The second, as to the revolution of ideology, Luk{\´a}cs regards proletariat ideology as the precondition of revolution, and Gramsci regards ideology as an independent field in a society. It is important to control it. The third, the relation between ideology and legitimization, Poulantzas and Habermas pay more attention to the relation between legitimization of politics and ideology. Ideology is the foundation of legitimization of political order. The fourth, as to Critical ideology, Frankfurt School is the main representative, especially Marcuse's One Dimensional Man and Fromm's analysis of social psychology. It is very important to study ideology theory, ideology play a key role in social life.}, language = {zh} } @article{Yao, author = {Yao, Dazhi}, title = {On Habermas's Criticism of Science and Technology [评哈贝马斯的科学技术批判]}, series = {Social Science Front Bimonthly [社会科学战线], No. 1 (1992), pp. 17-24.}, journal = {Social Science Front Bimonthly [社会科学战线], No. 1 (1992), pp. 17-24.}, abstract = {法兰克福学派以>社会批判理论<著称于世,实质上,他们的社会批判就是意识形态批判。在其不同的代表人物中,所批判的角度各有侧重,例如,霍克海默尔和阿多尔诺倾向于文化批判,马尔库塞更关心从整体上对>发达工业社会的意识形态<进行批判,弗洛姆偏重于社会心理批判,而哈贝马斯则主要从事于科学技术批判。从17和18世纪以来,西方哲学的苛刻的批判思维指向了世界的各个角落,唯有科学技 …}, language = {zh} }