@article{Chen, author = {Chen, Aihua}, title = {Patterns of Modern People's Living Antinomies and Their Transcendence: Analyzing Fromm's Man for Himself from Moral Philosophical Perspective [现代人生存的二律背反样态及其超越]}, series = {Jianghai Academic Journal [江海学刊], No. 2 (2015), pp. 40-46, 238.}, journal = {Jianghai Academic Journal [江海学刊], No. 2 (2015), pp. 40-46, 238.}, abstract = {在《为自己的人》一书中,围绕>道—德形态<的基本问题,弗洛姆揭示了人与自然伦理关系的二律背反、理性—人所蕴涵的二律背反;围绕>伦—理形态<的基本问题,他揭示了当代人与自身力量的关系被作为商品的知识所中介,进而导致人与其自身力量的二律背反;围绕>伦理—道德形态<的基本问题,弗洛姆指出,现代发达资本主义社会由于缺乏设计>更好的<人和>更好的<社会之眼光,使人与人、人与社会二律背反。如何才能消除或者超越上述的二律背反,成为一个完整意义上的人。弗洛姆试图从伦理学与心理学的结合构建基于生产性的人道主义—普遍伦理学。然而,在方法论上,他囿于人本主义伦理学及其精神分析社会—心理学的运思,脱离了现实社会基础,在实践中只能是一种>乌托邦<。}, language = {zh} } @article{Chen, author = {Chen, Kepin}, title = {[Freedom and Loneliness: The Psychological Dilemma of Contemporary College Students' Internet Obsession: Reflections According Fromm's Thought of >Escape from Freedom<] [自由与孤独:当代大学生网络迷恋心理困境——由弗洛姆>逃避自由<思想引发的思考]}, series = {Journal of Zhengzhou University of Light Industry (Social Science) [郑州轻工业学院学报(社会科学版)], No. 3 (2015), pp. 98-101.}, journal = {Journal of Zhengzhou University of Light Industry (Social Science) [郑州轻工业学院学报(社会科学版)], No. 3 (2015), pp. 98-101.}, abstract = {随着高等教育大众化时代的到来,大学生群体日益壮大,其存在与影响备受社会关注。20世纪西方著名精神分析学家弗洛姆,毕生致力于人的心理机制和性格结构的分析,其>逃避自由<思想对当代大学生网络迷恋心理困境分析有着重要的启示意义。弗洛姆的自由悖论生动地映照了当代大学生网络迷恋的心理矛盾,即自由与孤独并存。弗洛姆提出的确立>积极自由的存在状态<,为当代大学生走出网络迷恋心理困境指明了方向,其根本途径是让当代大学生积极地以爱>投入学习<,争取>积极自由<,超越异化,不再受网络技术所奴役,并最终成为网络技术的掌控者,从而进入既自由又不孤独的生存状态。}, language = {zh} } @article{Chen, author = {Chen, Lu}, title = {The Authoritarian Personality and Reflection of Its Real Impact on China [浅析威权主义人格并反思其对中国的现实影响]}, series = {Reform \& Openning [改革与开放], No. 13 (2015), pp. 87-88.}, journal = {Reform \& Openning [改革与开放], No. 13 (2015), pp. 87-88.}, abstract = {威权主义人格被弗洛姆戏称为>自行车性格<,此比喻既形象又颇具讽刺意味具有这种人格的人对上卑躬屈膝,对下唯我独尊。现实生活中这类人并不少见。本文分析了威权主义人格对我国现实的影响,探讨了塑造与人为善的健康人格的途径。}, language = {zh} } @article{Chen, author = {Chen, Susu}, title = {On the Jiangsu Chinese Teaching Materials in Context of Love: Problems and Countermeasures 浅谈苏教版语文教材中爱情篇目存在的问题及对策]}, series = {Modern Chinese (Language Research Edition) [现代语文(教学研究版)], No. 4 (2015), pp. 151-153.}, journal = {Modern Chinese (Language Research Edition) [现代语文(教学研究版)], No. 4 (2015), pp. 151-153.}, abstract = {根据我国学制,高中生的年龄一般在15—18岁左右,正处在青春中后期,这时的学生生理发育已经成熟,出现了与异性交往的渴求,想了解、接近异性,甚至出现了朦胧的爱情念头。面对情感困惑,由于无从学习、无人指导及家长、老师的回避、打压以及自己心理发育还很不成熟等原因,导致了青春期的情感问题成为了困扰学生的最大问题。弗洛姆认为,>爱是一种艺术,它像其他艺术一样,是可以而且应该学习的。<[1]作为处在教育主流位置的语文是有义务帮助高中生树立正确的爱情观与婚姻观并教会学生如何处理情感问题的,但高中语文教材中的爱情篇目是否能真正解}, language = {zh} } @article{Chen, author = {Chen, Xinxing}, title = {Consumption Alienation among Contemporary College Students and Adjustment of Irrational Consumer Psychology in Accordance with Fromm [从弗洛姆消费异化思想看当代大学生非理性消费心理及其调适]}, series = {Education Review [教育评论], No. 6 (2015), pp. 11-13.}, journal = {Education Review [教育评论], No. 6 (2015), pp. 11-13.}, abstract = {当代大学生存在诸多非理性消费心理。文章探讨它的表现及根源,并运用弗洛姆消费异化思想对其进行解释,梳理异化消费的危害,讨论非理性消费心理的调适途径。}, language = {zh} } @article{YangChen, author = {Yang, Guangjin and Chen, Zhaoyang}, title = {The Love Concept of College Students from a Survey [从一个调查看大学生的爱情观]}, series = {Popular Psychology [大众心理学, ] No. 8 ( 2015 (08), pp. 40-41.}, journal = {Popular Psychology [大众心理学, ] No. 8 ( 2015 (08), pp. 40-41.}, abstract = {随着经济和社会的发展,我们经常能在网络和现实生活中看到这样的场景:在爱情中,你爱我就必须服从我;爱情就像游戏,玩完这局还有下一局在等着。这些凸显了现代社会中一部分人对爱情的本质缺乏正确的认识。一般情况下,爱情是进入婚姻殿堂的必经之路,以爱情为基础的婚姻往往会是幸福的。那么,作为常被人讨论和关注的爱情到底是什么呢?对于这个问题,众说纷纭。早在1970年罗宾认为:爱情是个体对待特定他人持有的一种态度,包括更加思念对方,希望和对方身体接触,以及特定的行为举止,它有3种成份,即亲密依赖需求,帮助倾向,排他性和占有性倾}, language = {zh} } @article{JiaChen, author = {Jia, Yanyan and Chen, Houliang}, title = {>Love of Life< Versus >Love of Death<: A Frommian Perspective on Charles Johnson's >Middle Passage< [application of Fromm's theories to art]}, series = {Journal of Literature and Art Studies: English Version [文学与艺术研究:英文版], Vol. 5 (No. 3, 2015), pp.181-190. [DOI, fulltext: 10.17265/2159-5836/2015.03.004]}, journal = {Journal of Literature and Art Studies: English Version [文学与艺术研究:英文版], Vol. 5 (No. 3, 2015), pp.181-190. [DOI, fulltext: 10.17265/2159-5836/2015.03.004]}, abstract = {According to Fromm, the life instinct constitutes the primary potentiality in man, while the death instinct a secondary potentiality, and which of the two prevails depending crucially on the living conditions that the subject experiences during his or her childhood. Not limited to the individual level, Fromm's observation works on the collective level as well. Different environments foster different potentialities and lead to the formation of different cultures and ethics. A biophilic ethics treasures the value of love, peace, reciprocal altruism and unity of being, while a biophobic ethics is more addicted to hatred, violence, dualistic confrontation, and mutual destruction. Applying Fromm's theory to the interpretation of Charles Johnson's >Middle Passage< , readers can get a newly enlightened understanding of this award-winning masterpiece. Based on Fromm's hypothesis about human nature, this article analyzes the representation of the confrontations between the biophobic ethics and the biophilic ethics in this novel, the former being embodied by Captain Falcon's >syndrome of decay< which is also Johnson's critical metaphor of Western civilization, while the latter embodied by the Allmuseri culture's >syndrome of growth< which represents Johnson's idealistic imagination of the sum of non-Western civilization.}, language = {en} }