@article{Zaphiropoulos, author = {Zaphiropoulos, Miltiades}, title = {A reflective appraisal.}, series = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 32 (1996), pp. 633-640.}, journal = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 32 (1996), pp. 633-640.}, language = {en} } @article{Zaphiropoulos, author = {Zaphiropoulos, Miltiades}, title = {Can Psychoanalysis Be a Science?}, series = {International Forum of Psychoanalysis, Oslo (Scandinavian University Press) Vol. 10 (No. 2, June 2001), pp. 163-169.}, journal = {International Forum of Psychoanalysis, Oslo (Scandinavian University Press) Vol. 10 (No. 2, June 2001), pp. 163-169.}, abstract = {This is a study of the social character of managers and staff at the U.S. ACTION Agency. The context of the study was a joint union-management work improvement program that took place in the U.S. ACTION Agency from 1977-80. The author, with others from the Harvard Project on Technology, Work and Character, was contracted by ACTION, to be a third-party researcher-consultant for the program. The methods of this study include in-depth interviews with 30 people, both managers and staff. The instrument for these interviews was an >interpretive questionnaire< originally developed by Erich FROMM to elicit both ethnographic and characterological information. Additional data were gathered through dialogues with individuals and office groups, and through participant observation. The findings of this study include a typology of five social character types at ACTION headquarters: sociable idealists, craftsman-idealists, political idealists, technical administrators and diplomat-administrators. The study discusses their adaptations to the organization of work, and how people of different social character types interact with each other around the work tasks, both productively and unproductively. This research demonstrates the importance of understanding local meanings, values, and motivations when planning organizational change. It is an example of using social character theory and participant research as significant methods for achieving such understanding.The theoretical framework for interpretation is Erich FROMM's theory of social character as adapted by Michael Maccoby for use in organizational change projects. FROMM's theory develops a typology of shared character syndromes functionally related to the socioeconomic and cultural environment; Maccoby develops empirical typologies of adaptations to work in each work setting, conceptualized and named through >participant research< with the people studied. Participant research creates new knowledge that can stimulate and support change in the workplace.}, language = {en} } @article{Zaphiropoulos, author = {Zaphiropoulos, Miltiades}, title = {Discussion of H. Deutsch, >On Supervised Analysis<}, series = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, New York (William Alanson White Psychoanalytic Society), Vol. 19 (1983), pp. 67-70.}, journal = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, New York (William Alanson White Psychoanalytic Society), Vol. 19 (1983), pp. 67-70.}, language = {en} } @article{ZaphiropoulosLevenson, author = {Zaphiropoulos, Miltiades and Levenson, E. A.}, title = {Ethnocentricity and Psychoanalysis}, series = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, New York (William Alanson White Psychoanalytic Society), Vol. 23 (1987), pp. 446-462.}, journal = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, New York (William Alanson White Psychoanalytic Society), Vol. 23 (1987), pp. 446-462.}, language = {en} } @article{Zaphiropoulos, author = {Zaphiropoulos, Miltiades}, title = {I Remember It Well: Reminiscences on the History of the Academy}, series = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 34 (2006), pp. 013-018.}, journal = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 34 (2006), pp. 013-018.}, language = {en} } @article{Zaphiropoulos, author = {Zaphiropoulos, Miltiades}, title = {Introduction in >Clinical Innovations and Theoretical Controversy<}, series = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, New York (William Alanson White Psychoanalytic Society), Vol. 23 (1987), pp. 181-182.}, journal = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, New York (William Alanson White Psychoanalytic Society), Vol. 23 (1987), pp. 181-182.}, language = {en} } @article{Zaphiropoulos, author = {Zaphiropoulos, Miltiades L.}, title = {Is the Medical Model Appropriate for Psychoanalysis?}, series = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 10 (1982), pp. 129-136.}, journal = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 10 (1982), pp. 129-136.}, language = {en} } @misc{Zaphiropoulos, author = {Zaphiropoulos, Miltiades L.}, title = {Review Michael Robbins: Conceiving of Personality}, series = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 25 (1997), pp. 707-709.}, journal = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 25 (1997), pp. 707-709.}, language = {en} } @article{Zaphiropoulos, author = {Zaphiropoulos, Miltiades}, title = {Sir Gawain and The Green Knight (A Symposium)}, series = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, New York (William Alanson White Psychoanalytic Society), Vol. 29 (1993), pp. 123-129.}, journal = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, New York (William Alanson White Psychoanalytic Society), Vol. 29 (1993), pp. 123-129.}, language = {en} } @article{Zaphiropoulos, author = {Zaphiropoulos, Miltiades}, title = {The Analytic Stalemate: Clinical Perspectives}, series = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, New York (William Alanson White Psychoanalytic Society), Vol. 27 (1991), p. 482.}, journal = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, New York (William Alanson White Psychoanalytic Society), Vol. 27 (1991), p. 482.}, language = {en} }