@article{Niel, author = {Niel, Mathilde}, title = {The Phenomenon of Technology: Liberation or Alienation of Man? (Japanese)}, series = {E. Fromm (Ed.), Shakaishugi humanizumu, vol. 2, Tokyo (Kinokuniyashoten) 1967, pp. 106-119.}, journal = {E. Fromm (Ed.), Shakaishugi humanizumu, vol. 2, Tokyo (Kinokuniyashoten) 1967, pp. 106-119.}, language = {ja} } @article{Nakagawa, author = {Nakagawa, Yoshiharu}, title = {「永遠の哲学」における「気づき」の存在論 - マインドフルネスの新たな基礎づけを求めて [An Ontology of Awareness in the Perennial Philosophy: Toward a New Foundation of Mindfulness]}, series = {トランスパーソナル心理学/精神医学[Japanese Journal of Transpersonal Psychology/Psychiatry], Vol. 17, No. 1 (2018), pp. 33-48. [doi.org/10.32218/transpersonal.17.1_33]}, journal = {トランスパーソナル心理学/精神医学[Japanese Journal of Transpersonal Psychology/Psychiatry], Vol. 17, No. 1 (2018), pp. 33-48. [doi.org/10.32218/transpersonal.17.1_33]}, abstract = {づき」の概念が位置しており、この意味で永遠の哲学はマインドフルネスの理論基盤になりうるものである。本考察ではまず、ハクスレー、スミス、ラム・ダス、ウィルバーを援用し、永遠の哲学が多次元的な理論であることを示し、とくに魂の本質が気づき、観照であり、さらにスピリットが限りない純粋な気づきであること明らかにし、非二元的気づきに言及した。つぎに気づきの存在論を、ウパニシャッド、シャンカラ、ラマナ・マハルシ、ニサルガダッタ・マハラジを引きながら検討した。そしてクリシュナムルティ、フロム、ウィルバーを用いて、気づきと身心の関連を考察し、最後にハクスレーの端緒をもとに、気づきの多次元的教育をとりあげた。}, language = {ja} } @article{Motoyama, author = {Motoyama, Yoichi}, title = {「迷惑をかけたこと」の今日的解釈 [A Current Interpretation of >Causing Troubles to Others<]}, series = {内観研究 [Journal of the Japan Naikan Association], Vol. 13, No. 1 (2007), pp. 59-70. [doi.org/10.34593/jna.13.1_59]}, journal = {内観研究 [Journal of the Japan Naikan Association], Vol. 13, No. 1 (2007), pp. 59-70. [doi.org/10.34593/jna.13.1_59]}, abstract = {内観を外部から見ると、内観三項目の中の「迷惑をかけたこと」が、自己抑制的になり自分の考えや気持ちを表現できなくなるのではないか、あるいは、道徳的な響きを感じる、といったふうな誤解を与える場合もあるようである。そこで、内観三項目がいかに精神の認識力を成長させるか、その構造について考察するとともに、とりわけ「迷惑をかけたこと」を調べる有用性を精神分析学者のエーリッヒ・フロムの「成熟すると両親から自由になり、自分自身の中に母性原理と父性原理を作り上げる。子どもは自分自身の父親になり、母親となる」という理論を借りて説明を試みた。内観をすることが、どうして内部に母性原理と父性原理を作り上げることが出来るのかを考察し、内観における「罪悪感」をその過程と構造を従来の罪悪感と比較しながら考察することによって「迷惑をかけたこと」の今日的解釈を導き、東洋思想から生まれた内観を西洋思想の言葉に置き換えようとするものである。}, language = {ja} } @article{Morita, author = {Morita, Kazunao}, title = {E. フロム精神分析理論における宗教論の教育的含意 [Educational Implications of the Theory of Religion in E. Fromm's Psychoanalysis]}, series = {教育学研究 [The Japanese Journal of Educational Research], Vol. 87, No. 4 (2020), pp. 131-141. [doi.org/10.11555/kyoiku.87.4_597]}, journal = {教育学研究 [The Japanese Journal of Educational Research], Vol. 87, No. 4 (2020), pp. 131-141. [doi.org/10.11555/kyoiku.87.4_597]}, abstract = {本稿の目的は、精神分析家エリッヒ・フロムの宗教論を検討し、「教化」する権威的な「宗教」に抵抗しつつ、なおも「宗教的」に生きる方途を探った彼の思索の教育的含意を明らかにすることである。結論として、本稿は、フロムが「気づき」の「能力」を尊重することによって、「宗教的」に生きることを構想していた事実を闡明し、最後に、彼の理論が道徳教育の教科化の事例に先鋭化される現代教育の問題に対してもつ意義を明示する。}, language = {ja} } @article{Mizuta, author = {Mizuta, Makoto}, title = {エーリッヒ・フロムにおける「健康」と「幸福」 : クォリティ・オブ・ライフ」に関する基礎付けの試み [>Health< and >Happiness< in Erich Fromm: Having an Elementary Concept of the >Quality of Life<]}, series = {医学哲学 医学倫理 [Annals of the Japanese Association for Philosophical and Ethical Researches in Medicine], Vol. 21 (2003), pp. 98-111. [doi.org/10.24504/itetsu.21.0_98]}, journal = {医学哲学 医学倫理 [Annals of the Japanese Association for Philosophical and Ethical Researches in Medicine], Vol. 21 (2003), pp. 98-111. [doi.org/10.24504/itetsu.21.0_98]}, abstract = {When we talk about the >quality of life< (QOL) we should inquire just into the >quality< of human life. Generally speaking, a qualitative thing includes something original that has no substitute. Each person's existence is an irreplaceable life, and it has a unique value. QOL is a subject about the qualitative values of human life. The pursuit of QOL is the pursuit of a >healthy< human life or >happiness.< E. Fromm said that a person represents the whole human being, and that an individual is a physico-spiritual totality. He also said that the goal of a person in life is to be himself. According to Fromm, the fundamental human desire aims to conquer >existential dichotomies,< such as >life and death,< >solidarity and aloneness.< Everyone shows one's answer depending on his/her character or personality. Only a >productive character< can get happiness through its answer. That is the basic attitude by which >human nature< and >individuality< are brought into full play at the same time. Such a person gropes for a >sane society<. And such a society ought to bring up sound persons. QOL as elements of a living environment are useful as conditions for happiness. However, the most important thing is the >quality< of each one's life itself. This kind of QOL is shown by the basic attitude as >personality.< A person who lives a well-filled life has a high quality of life. The scale of quality of life as the standard common to human beings is >human nature,< which is also the foundation of human equality. This is the >basis< of human rights. And each person will be the judge of the matter connected with >happiness<, making use of the activation of individuality. So, medical persons should not confuse QOL and >social usefulness!< Medical preference order is not a problem of QOL but purely a problem of medical technique.}, language = {ja} } @article{Misawa, author = {Misawa, Ken-Ichi}, title = {エーリッヒ・フロムの疎外概念 [A Critical Appraisal of Erich Fromm's Concept of Alienation]}, series = {社会学評論 [Japanese Sociological Review], Vol. 15, No. 4 (1965), pp. 67-78, 203. [doi.org/10.4057/jsr.15.4_67]}, journal = {社会学評論 [Japanese Sociological Review], Vol. 15, No. 4 (1965), pp. 67-78, 203. [doi.org/10.4057/jsr.15.4_67]}, abstract = {[First page] The aim of this paper is to clarify the difference between Fromm's concept of alienation from Marx's, and thus to evaluate the significance Fromm's idea of alienation. 1. The standard of the un-alienated Marx sees man as a process of self-creation through labor (= activity in general). To Marx, the un-alienated man is, first, the individual two each day realizes the potentialities of his being through work which gives his inner capacities the form of concrete embodiments, and second, at the same time the subject of history whose potentialities and inner capacities are got the form of historical embodiments through the mode of production in each period. Fromm as a moralist changes Marx's objective concept of man into a subjective one. Fromm conceives man as the bearer of the unchangeable basic needs which are inherent in human nature and the human condition. For Fromm, the un-alienated man is the man who has satisfied and fulfilled these basic needs in a productive way, who has realized a normative basis of his nature which remains the same always and everywhere. From Marx's point of view, love, happiness and other universal values which constitute Fromm's substantialized criterion of the un-alienated are nothing but passing phenomena which are at every moment to be enriched, to be changed and to be conquered in the self-creating process of man through labor. Fromm does not bring Marx's thought up to date but pulls it back to the stage of Feuerbach's thought. 2. Alienation and its social background. Fromm conceives alienation as a psychological phenomenon. Alienation is thought to be a pattern of social character which has been former without the fulfillment of the basic needs. Fromm's concept of alienation is, after all, an unhistorical concept. Alienation in Marx's sense is not a mere psychological state, but an objective and total situation of man which involves three spheres: the realm …}, language = {ja} } @article{Medow, author = {Medow, Paul}, title = {The Humanistic Ideals of the Enlightenment and Mathematical Economics (Japanese)}, series = {E. Fromm (Ed.), Shakaishugi humanizumu, vol. 2, Tokyo (Kinokuniyashoten) 1967, pp. 183-195.}, journal = {E. Fromm (Ed.), Shakaishugi humanizumu, vol. 2, Tokyo (Kinokuniyashoten) 1967, pp. 183-195.}, language = {ja} } @article{Marković, author = {Marković, Mihailo}, title = {Humanism and Dialectic (Japanese)}, series = {E. Fromm (Ed.), Shakaishugi humanizumu, vol. 1, Tokyo (Kinokuniyashoten) 1967, pp. 109-122.}, journal = {E. Fromm (Ed.), Shakaishugi humanizumu, vol. 1, Tokyo (Kinokuniyashoten) 1967, pp. 109-122.}, language = {ja} } @article{Marcuse, author = {Marcuse, Herbert}, title = {Socialist Humanism? (Japanese)}, series = {E. Fromm (Ed.), Shakaishugi humanizumu, vol. 1, Tokyo (Kinokuniyashoten) 1967, pp. 134-145.}, journal = {E. Fromm (Ed.), Shakaishugi humanizumu, vol. 1, Tokyo (Kinokuniyashoten) 1967, pp. 134-145.}, language = {ja} } @article{Kosik, author = {Kos{\´i}k, Karel}, title = {Man and Philosophy (Japanese)}, series = {E. Fromm (Ed.), Shakaishugi humanizumu, vol. 1, Tokyo (Kinokuniyashoten) 1967, pp. 199-208.}, journal = {E. Fromm (Ed.), Shakaishugi humanizumu, vol. 1, Tokyo (Kinokuniyashoten) 1967, pp. 199-208.}, language = {ja} }