@article{Vranicki, author = {Vranicki, Predag}, title = {Socialism and the Problem of Alienation (Japanese)}, series = {E. Fromm (Ed.), Shakaishugi humanizumu, vol. 2, Tokyo (Kinokuniyashoten) 1967, pp. 069-083.}, journal = {E. Fromm (Ed.), Shakaishugi humanizumu, vol. 2, Tokyo (Kinokuniyashoten) 1967, pp. 069-083.}, language = {ja} } @article{Volpe, author = {Volpe, Galvano della}, title = {The Legal Philosophy of Socialism (Japanese)}, series = {E. Fromm (Ed.), Shakaishugi humanizumu, vol. 2, Tokyo (Kinokuniyashoten) 1967, pp. 204-219.}, journal = {E. Fromm (Ed.), Shakaishugi humanizumu, vol. 2, Tokyo (Kinokuniyashoten) 1967, pp. 204-219.}, language = {ja} } @article{Titmuss, author = {Titmuss, Richard M.}, title = {Social Welfare and the Art of Giving (Japanese)}, series = {E. Fromm (Ed.), Shakaishugi humanizumu, vol. 2, Tokyo (Kinokuniyashoten) 1967, pp. 153-169.}, journal = {E. Fromm (Ed.), Shakaishugi humanizumu, vol. 2, Tokyo (Kinokuniyashoten) 1967, pp. 153-169.}, language = {ja} } @article{Thomas, author = {Thomas, Norman}, title = {Humanistic Socialism and the Future (Japanese)}, series = {E. Fromm (Ed.), Shakaishugi humanizumu, vol. 2, Tokyo (Kinokuniyashoten) 1967, pp. 123-133.}, journal = {E. Fromm (Ed.), Shakaishugi humanizumu, vol. 2, Tokyo (Kinokuniyashoten) 1967, pp. 123-133.}, language = {ja} } @article{Tanaka, author = {Tanaka, Tsunemi}, title = {エーリッヒ・フロム「自己実現」論の成立と構成 [On the Genetic Process and Construction of Erich Fromm's Theory of >Self-Realization<]}, series = {教育哲学研究 [Studies in the Philosophy of Education], No. 42, pp. 1-19. [doi.org/10.11399/kyouikutetsugaku1959.1980.42_1]}, journal = {教育哲学研究 [Studies in the Philosophy of Education], No. 42, pp. 1-19. [doi.org/10.11399/kyouikutetsugaku1959.1980.42_1]}, abstract = {(1) Erich Fromm's theory of >self-realization< has developed through the process of critical examination into S. Freud's biological-deterministic rationale and his own cultural-deterministic one in his early works, and it consequently includes both of these factors as the vital components. (2) In his theory, therefore, a human-being is regarded as an existence who can realize his own primary potentialities to be for himself only through his self-determining, spontaneous-productive activities as the responses or re-actions to his biological/socio-cultural determinants. In this sense, man's self-realization is the very process of such productive re-activities. (3) The essential point of the controversial issues between Fromm and the other members of the >Frankfurt School<-Horkheimer, Adorno, Marcuse-is concerned with the objective possibility of self-realization within the real context of the present society. However, Fromm's rebuttal against their negative arguments concerning his self-deterministic rationale seems to be insufficient so far as I know. (4) In his theory, the possibility of self-realization is based on his >faith< -or >paradoxical hope< -n human nature inherently having potential powers and strivings for self-realization within itself. By this faith, his practical efforts in psychiatry and his own self-realization have been supported and, at the same time, the faith itself has also been verified through these experiences. (5) Thus, we can grasp the innate construction of Fromm's theory of self-realization as follows. a) His theory is based on the self-deterministic rationale on man's personality. b) But the biological/cultural determinisms are still alive, because in his theory man's self-realization is regarded as the process which is constructed only through his productive re-activities to his own biological/socio-cultural determinants. c) His self-deterministic rationale is founded on the above-mentioned >faith<. In other words, the theory of self-realization is the very product of this faith. (6) The essential process of what is called >self-formation< (Selbst-bildung) in educational philosophy can be identified with the self-realization through man's spontaneous-productive re-activities.}, language = {ja} } @article{Svitak, author = {Svit{\´a}k, Ivan}, title = {The Sources of Socialist Humanism (Japanese)}, series = {E. Fromm (Ed.), Shakaishugi humanizumu, vol. 1, Tokyo (Kinokuniyashoten) 1967, pp. 033-047.}, journal = {E. Fromm (Ed.), Shakaishugi humanizumu, vol. 1, Tokyo (Kinokuniyashoten) 1967, pp. 033-047.}, language = {ja} } @article{Supek, author = {Supek, Rudi}, title = {Freedom and Polydeterminism in the Criticism of Culture (Japanese)}, series = {E. Fromm (Ed.), Shakaishugi humanizumu, vol. 2, Tokyo (Kinokuniyashoten) 1967, pp. 046-065.}, journal = {E. Fromm (Ed.), Shakaishugi humanizumu, vol. 2, Tokyo (Kinokuniyashoten) 1967, pp. 046-065.}, language = {ja} } @article{Suchodolski, author = {Suchodolski, Bogdan}, title = {Renaissance Humanism and Marxian Humanism (Japanese)}, series = {E. Fromm (Ed.), Shakaishugi humanizumu, vol. 1, Tokyo (Kinokuniyashoten) 1967, pp. 048-059.}, journal = {E. Fromm (Ed.), Shakaishugi humanizumu, vol. 1, Tokyo (Kinokuniyashoten) 1967, pp. 048-059.}, language = {ja} } @article{Senghor, author = {Senghor, L{\´e}opold}, title = {Socialism Is a Humanism (Japanese)}, series = {E. Fromm (Ed.), Shakaishugi humanizumu, vol. 1, Tokyo (Kinokuniyashoten) 1967, pp. 073-090.}, journal = {E. Fromm (Ed.), Shakaishugi humanizumu, vol. 1, Tokyo (Kinokuniyashoten) 1967, pp. 073-090.}, language = {ja} } @article{Sekine, author = {Sekine, Hiroaki}, title = {エーリッヒ ・ フロム ノ 「 リセイテキ ケンイ 」 ガイネン ニ タイスル イチ コウサツ : キョウイク ニ オケル ケンイ ニ ツイテ ノ シロン [An Essay about Authority in Education: Focusing Erich Fromm's Thoughts on >Rational Authority<]}, series = {リベラル・アーツ [Liberal Arts], No. 8 (2014), pp. 39-51. [ISSN 18816746] [core.ac.uk/download/229829681.pdf]}, journal = {リベラル・アーツ [Liberal Arts], No. 8 (2014), pp. 39-51. [ISSN 18816746] [core.ac.uk/download/229829681.pdf]}, abstract = {The aim of this article is to rethink the authority in education tentatively. For this purpose, this article pays attention to a conception called >rational authority<, which was presented by Erich Fromm (1900-80), who was famous sociopsychologist in the 20th century. Many studies of pedagogy or educational science have emphasized the need of the authority in education. But most of them tend to discuss a desirable quantity of the authority and do not fully have qualitative discrimination of the authority in educational fields. However, Erich Fromm's thoughts on authority seem to have potentiality for that qualitative discrimination. According to Fromm's early texts, especially in Escape from Freedom (1941) and Man for Himself (1947), >rational authority< have four characteristics. That is, 1) >rational authority< is ruled by the elements of love, admiration and gratitude, 2) it can become the model of the identification generally or partially, 3) the authority has its source in competence, and 4) it is always temporary. It is certain that these characteristics are rather abstractive, but in considering works of his latter period, the dynamics between >rational authority< and >inhibiting authority< is suggested. This dynamism hints for the possibility of rethinking of the authority in education.}, language = {ja} } @article{Sekine, author = {Sekine, Hiroaki}, title = {エーリッヒ・フロム「自己実現」論の再構成 : 「持つこと」と「在ること」の連関に注目して [The Reconstruction of Erich Fromm's >Self-realization< Theory: Focusing on the Organic Relation between >To Have< and >To Be<]}, series = {[教育学研究 [The Japanese Journal of Educational Research], Vol. 76, No. 3 (2009), pp. 334-346. [doi.org/10.11555/kyoiku.76.3_334]}, journal = {[教育学研究 [The Japanese Journal of Educational Research], Vol. 76, No. 3 (2009), pp. 334-346. [doi.org/10.11555/kyoiku.76.3_334]}, abstract = {本稿の目的は、エーリッヒ・フロムの「自己実現」論を再構成し、その人間形成論的な可能性を提示することである。フロムはしばしば社会および人間を二つの位相に分けたうえで、片方を持ち上げてもう片方を非難するという論法を採用したが、従来それらは素朴な勧善懲悪的図式として理解される傾向にあった。だがその遺稿から明らかになったフロムによる初期マルクスへの直接的な参照は、そうしたフロムの方法論が決して単純な善悪二元論にはおさまらないことを示唆している。マルクスの言う私有財産の「止揚」プロセスとフロムの想定したこつの様式観が交わりあう過程とをそれぞれのテクストにより突き合わせていくことで、フロムの「自己実現」論は、発達の脱中心化を志向する近年の教育人間学的なモメントを理論レベルにおいて批判的に彫琢しうる、他とのつながりに開かれながらも「自己」へと再帰的に準拠する人間形成論として、新たに定位される。}, language = {ja} } @article{SchatzWinter, author = {Schatz, Oskar and Winter, Ernst Florian}, title = {Alienation, Marxism, and Humanism (A Christian Viewpoint) (Japanese)}, series = {E. Fromm (Ed.), Shakaishugi humanizumu, vol. 2, Tokyo (Kinokuniyashoten) 1967, pp. 084-105.}, journal = {E. Fromm (Ed.), Shakaishugi humanizumu, vol. 2, Tokyo (Kinokuniyashoten) 1967, pp. 084-105.}, language = {ja} } @article{Schaff, author = {Schaff, Adam}, title = {Marxism and the Philosophy of Man (Japanese)}, series = {E. Fromm (Ed.), Shakaishugi humanizumu, vol. 1, Tokyo (Kinokuniyashoten) 1967, pp. 175.186.}, journal = {E. Fromm (Ed.), Shakaishugi humanizumu, vol. 1, Tokyo (Kinokuniyashoten) 1967, pp. 175.186.}, language = {ja} } @article{Rubel, author = {Rubel, Maximilien}, title = {Reflections on Utopia and Revolution (Japanese)}, series = {E. Fromm (Ed.), Shakaishugi humanizumu, vol. 1, Tokyo (Kinokuniyashoten) 1967, pp. 248-257.}, journal = {E. Fromm (Ed.), Shakaishugi humanizumu, vol. 1, Tokyo (Kinokuniyashoten) 1967, pp. 248-257.}, language = {ja} } @article{Prucha, author = {Prucha, Milan}, title = {Marxism and the Existential Problems of Man (Japanese)}, series = {E. Fromm (Ed.), Shakaishugi humanizumu, vol. 1, Tokyo (Kinokuniyashoten) 1967, pp. 187-198.}, journal = {E. Fromm (Ed.), Shakaishugi humanizumu, vol. 1, Tokyo (Kinokuniyashoten) 1967, pp. 187-198.}, language = {ja} } @article{Petrović, author = {Petrović, Gajo}, title = {Man and Freedom (Japanese)}, series = {E. Fromm (Ed.), Shakaishugi humanizumu, vol. 2, Tokyo (Kinokuniyashoten) 1967, pp. 038-045.}, journal = {E. Fromm (Ed.), Shakaishugi humanizumu, vol. 2, Tokyo (Kinokuniyashoten) 1967, pp. 038-045.}, language = {ja} } @article{Pejović, author = {Pejović, Danilo}, title = {On the Power and Impotence of Philosophy (Japanese)}, series = {E. Fromm (Ed.), Shakaishugi humanizumu, vol. 1, Tokyo (Kinokuniyashoten) 1967, pp. 235-247.}, journal = {E. Fromm (Ed.), Shakaishugi humanizumu, vol. 1, Tokyo (Kinokuniyashoten) 1967, pp. 235-247.}, language = {ja} } @article{Omine, author = {Omine, Mitsuhanu}, title = {運動部活動における生徒の体罰受容の問題性:エーリッヒ・フロムの権威論を手掛かりとして [Problems Related to Student Acceptance of Corporal Punishment During Extracurricular Sports Activities: With Reference to Erich Fromm's Authority Theory]}, series = {体育学研究 [Japan Journal of Physical Education, Health and Sport Sciences], Volume 61, No. 2 (2016), pp. 629-637. [doi.org/10.5432/jjpehss.15109]}, journal = {体育学研究 [Japan Journal of Physical Education, Health and Sport Sciences], Volume 61, No. 2 (2016), pp. 629-637. [doi.org/10.5432/jjpehss.15109]}, abstract = {The purpose of this study was to analyze problems related to the mechanism whereby students can accept corporal punishment during extracurricular sports activities with reference to the books Escape from Freedom and Man for Himself that were central to Erich Fromm's authority theory. Specifically, the author focused on the concepts of >authoritarian character,< >authoritarian ethics,< and >authoritarian conscience.< Fromm pointed out that anxiety prompted Germany's citizens to give up their freedom in order to obey authoritarian powers such as Hitler and the Nazis. Students taking part in extracurricular sports activities were considered from the viewpoint of Fromm's authority theory. It was revealed that students comply with a leader's authority in order to relieve anxiety, and have positive thoughts about corporal punishment. Furthermore, it was found that such acceptance of corporal punishment succeeded in eliminating conspicuous suffering, but not in removing any underlying conflicts. Fromm pointed that fear of anxiety was relieved by spontaneous activity. To achieve spontaneous activity by students, it was suggested that some form of measure that does not create the type of partnership that occurred between Germany's citizens and Hitler would be desirable for any relationship between the leader of extracurricular sports activities and the students.}, language = {ja} } @article{Kyosuke, author = {Kyosuke, Nukaga}, title = {超自我支配による疎外現象 - フロム自我理論における疎外論 [Alienation Phenomenon Generated by Super-ego - Alienation Theory on Fromm's Ego Theory]}, series = {現代社会学理論研究 [The Journal of Studies in Contemporary Sociological Theory], Vol. 10 (2016), pp. 115-127. [doi.org/10.34327/sstj.10.0_115]}, journal = {現代社会学理論研究 [The Journal of Studies in Contemporary Sociological Theory], Vol. 10 (2016), pp. 115-127. [doi.org/10.34327/sstj.10.0_115]}, abstract = {エーリッヒ・フロムは、フランクフルト社会研究所在籍時に、権威主義に対する批判的考察を行っている。この考察は、フロム独自の自我理論と疎外- 物象化論として把握可能である。この権威主義研究の際、フロムはフロイト自我理論への批判を、フロイトの概念である超自我、自我、エスという自我三層構造論を踏襲しながら行っている。自我が弱い時、彼は、「内部世界と外部世界」を生活充足の対象とする人格的課題を、超自我が担うことを認めている。しかしこの時、超自我が精神を支配し、この過程内で抑圧という心的機制が生じる。この抑圧によって自己は消耗し、自我の能動的行為編成機能と現実検証機能が低下するのである。そして、この超自我は権威との相互的な再帰的構造化過程を形成する。超自我は、自己の精神的エネルギーを権威対象へ投影する。さらに投影、備給された精神的エネルギーが、権威の命令を内化することによって、超自我に回帰していく。この諸過程によって、権威への合理的批判は抑制され、自我機能の低下が起こる。さらに、これは社会的相互作用として成立しているため、社会文化領域での物象化が生じるのである。最終的に、この超自我による物象化- 疎外現象は、次の四つの具体的事象へと帰結する。それは①精神的なエネルギーの譲渡=疎外、②自己関係の疎外、③自己による自己産出過程の物象化された超自我と権威への譲渡=疎外、④自己関係内部にある、権威対象以外の他者からの疎外である。}, language = {ja} } @article{Chokuso, author = {Chokuso, Nomura}, title = {エディプス・コンプレ・ソクス(エレクトラ・コンブレ・ソクス) [Oedipus Complex (Electra Complex)]}, series = {サイコアナリティカル英文学論叢 [The Journal of Psychoanalytica], No. 3 (1980), pp. 51-58. [doi.org/10.11445/psell1978.1980.51]}, journal = {サイコアナリティカル英文学論叢 [The Journal of Psychoanalytica], No. 3 (1980), pp. 51-58. [doi.org/10.11445/psell1978.1980.51]}, abstract = {[I] Oedipus Complex A. (1) The outline of King Oedipus by Sophocles. (2) Oedipus did not know the murder of his father by himself, and succeeded to the father's throne, making his mother his own >Qeen< without any knowledge of the truth of these facts, and without never falling in love with his mother. It is only the destiny of the oracle by Apollo. As the resulting disaster in his despair, he forced to make himself blind, exiled out of his ruling country. >The myth can be understood as a symbol not of the incestuous love between mother and son but of the rebellion of the son against the authority of the father in the partriarchal family; that the marriage of Oedipus and Jocasta is only a secondary element, only one of the symbols of the victory of the son, who takes his father's place with it all his privileges.< (The Forgotten Language by Fromm, p. 202). B. Antigone by Sophocles. (Conscious Oedipus complex between father and son). [II] Electra Complex (Chiefly through My Mother-My Self by Nancy Friday) with the daughter's envy, and jealousy of her mother, (attached to the closeness to and the symbiosis to the mother), the girl wants to be loved by her father, taking the place of her mother. Father must love his daughter with his wife in love.}, language = {ja} }