@article{Reis, author = {Reis, Carlos}, title = {Introdu{\c{c}}{\~a}o {\´a} leitura de Erich Fromm [Introduction to Erich Fromm's Thought] [Introduction {\`a} la Pens{\´e}e de Erich Fromm]}, series = {Filosofia. Revista da Faculdade de Letras da Universidade do Porto, Vol. 4 (1987), pp. 65-75. [Online ISSN 2183-6892] [ojs.letras.up.pt/index.php/filosofia/article/view/202/188] [doi.org/10.21747/202]}, journal = {Filosofia. Revista da Faculdade de Letras da Universidade do Porto, Vol. 4 (1987), pp. 65-75. [Online ISSN 2183-6892] [ojs.letras.up.pt/index.php/filosofia/article/view/202/188] [doi.org/10.21747/202]}, abstract = {Erich Fromm tenta o di{\´a}logo entre Marx e Freud, um encontro entre a teoria cr{\´i}tica da sociedade e a da sua consci{\^e}ncia. Este {\´e} o ponto de partida para uma cr{\´i}tica das ideologias, ou seja, uma an{\´a}lise do que o Autor considera a patologia dos comportamentos que se codificam num >Car{\´a}cter Social<, pe{\c{c}}a-m{\´o}vel e articuladora da infra e da superstruturas. O cimento, mas tamb{\´e}m a dinamite, que est{\~a}o na origem e nos objectivos duma estrat{\´e}gia global de manipula{\c{c}}{\~a}o da(s) exig{\^e}ncia(s). A 'nossa inten{\c{c}}{\~a}o {\´e} apresentar uma recens{\~a}o cr{\´i}tica, que apela para o seu universo te{\´o}rico origina.}, language = {pt} } @misc{Goya, author = {Goya, Will}, title = {Review Fromm, E.: Escape from Freedom (1941a, Portuguese)}, series = {Internet: http://www.filosofia.com.br/vi_classic.php?id=9}, journal = {Internet: http://www.filosofia.com.br/vi_classic.php?id=9}, language = {pt} } @article{Carvalho, author = {Carvalho, E.}, title = {O humanismo normativo de Fromm.}, series = {Revista da Faculdade de Letras: Filosofia, s{\´e}rie II, vol. 04, 1987, pp. 117-141. Dispon{\´i}vel em: http://ler.letras.up.pt/uploads/ficheiros/1353.pdf.}, journal = {Revista da Faculdade de Letras: Filosofia, s{\´e}rie II, vol. 04, 1987, pp. 117-141. Dispon{\´i}vel em: http://ler.letras.up.pt/uploads/ficheiros/1353.pdf.}, abstract = {Our work >Fromm's Normative Humanism< — which, as a matter of fact, is divided in six topics: 1] Sacred Contemporaneity; 2) Ideologic Logos; 3) One more >ism< to rhyme with Reformism; 4) Fromm's Marx; 5) The Frommian man; and 6) The Metaphysical Terrorism — has as its main aim the critical >break-up< of the theoretical conjectures which are the structure of Fromm's work (and specially, his The Sane Society), whose analytical insufficiency, for us, is notorious, being determined somehere in the text as follows: - >E. Fromm confines himself to repeat the humanistic myth of the supernatural man, in which the opposition nature/culture assumes the shape of methodological directive of all his discourse.< - However, even if our analysis has as its focal point Fromm's conceptualization of the being of man in the contemporaneous society, it is not restricted by this subject, because it generically fits in the whole problematic of humanism. - Really, in the last resort, the text reveals not only a criticism to Fromm's theoretical posture, but also a criticism >Flumianism<, whose definition to us is the metaphisical determination of man edified by the occidental thought. So, won't be somewhat problematic the title of our dissertation? Is it really possible to achieve a humanism without a normative imposition? Owing to this, by the by, it would be stimulating to read the >Brief {\"u}ber den 'Humanismus'<, by Heidegger. Finally, it must be said — to eliminate possible misunderstandings — that being theoretically anti-humanistic isn't properly to be against man. This seem to be clear, but as to many people it isn't, we let here the warning.}, language = {pt} }