@article{Dimen, author = {Dimen, Muriel}, title = {The Woman Who Mistook the Meditation Class for Her Destination}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues, Vol. 14 (2004), pp. 859-865.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues, Vol. 14 (2004), pp. 859-865.}, abstract = {Psychoanalysis and politics intersect variously. Some psychoanalytic writings have critiqued society, whereas others have applied socially critical insights about class and race to illuminate transference - countertransference enactments and other clinical matters. The hegemonic politics of psychoanalysis, less intentional but equally influential, define maturity and mental health by idealizing of some psychological and behavioral traits and some clinical stances (especially authoritarianism), and by demonizing of certain categories of persons (notably nonheterosexuals and people of color), certain types of practice (e.g., social work), and certain sorts of ideas (e.g., that clinical and theoretical practices are political practices, too). One way to redress these problems is to reclaim the marginal - homosexuality and queerness, affect's presence in politics, and the political in the psychical (in which instance, the concept of multiple self-states may be useful). Any such effort requires recognizing and articulating one's own subject-position, that is, one's own class, race, gender, or sexual location.}, language = {en} } @article{Dimen, author = {Dimen, Muriel}, title = {Something there is that doesn't love a wall}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 12 (2002), pp. 451-455.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 12 (2002), pp. 451-455.}, abstract = {I reflect on the psychoanalytic and political and personal meaning - opr meaninglessness - of the terrorist attack on the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001.}, language = {en} } @misc{Dimen, author = {Dimen, Muriel}, title = {Review Essay: Psychoanalysis, Post-Modernism and the Lesbian Rule}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 11 (2001), pp. 825-860.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 11 (2001), pp. 825-860.}, abstract = {Perversion challenges one's intellect, passion, clinical practice, and cultural and personal values. As a topic, it also generates anxiety - a problem addressed in this paper by an experimental literary format. Perversion is conventionally deemed a self-evident, pathological entity. From the perspective on multiplicity and discontinuity taken here, however, its familiar meanings fall apart at the seams, yielding new questions of theory and technique. Criteria of mental health, standards of morality, and power structures are shown to intertwine in the discourse on perversion. Recent theological and clinical work on this topic by Bach, Chasseguet-Smirgel, Kernberg, and Khan, valuable in certain ways and problematic in others, is assessed and historicized. A claim both classical and iconoclastic is made: If perversion can coexist with health, if its status as illness varies with cultural time and place, then, conversely, any sexuality may be symptomatic, or healthy. Put another way, sexuality has nothing inherently to do with mental health or mental illness.}, language = {en} } @article{Dimen, author = {Dimen, Muriel}, title = {Reply to Commentaries}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 10 (2000), pp. 569-578.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 10 (2000), pp. 569-578.}, abstract = {This symposium addresses a psychoanalytic lacuna: race. The papers it comprises, drawn from both clinical and academic precincts, pick up the thread of social commentary that runs through the psychoanalytic fabric. Here Psychoanalytic Dialogues joins other like-minded efforts to position the psychic and the social, the clinical and the cultural, in the same discourse, and to consider the painfulness of political inequity amid therapeutic intimacy. These essays demonstrate the clinical and intellectual benefits of the engagement with the disciplines characteristic of psychoanalysis in the previous generation. They also reveal how the evolution of psychoanalytic practice itself potentiates recognition of psychoanalytically marginalized dimensions of society and culture that constitute subjectivity and inform everyday clinical life.}, language = {en} } @article{Dimen, author = {Dimen, Muriel}, title = {Penetrating psychoanalytic theory. Reply to commentary}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 09 (1999), pp. 349-361.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 09 (1999), pp. 349-361.}, language = {en} } @article{Dimen, author = {Dimen, Muriel}, title = {Playing with the Reality of Analytic Love: Commentary on Paper by Jody Messler Davies >Falling in Love with Love<}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 09 (1999), pp. 415-440.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 09 (1999), pp. 415-440.}, abstract = {Recent contributions to the psychoanalytic literature suggest that the classical focus on psychosexuaiity has been lost. This charge is both wrong and right. After briefly surveying the evolution of psychoanalytic thinking on sexuality and reviewing the concept of libido, this essay retrieves the word Lust from the footnotes to which Freud consigned it and remodels it into a new idea. The proposition is put forth that a postclassical theory of sex compatible with contemporary clinical and theoretical practice can emerge once sexuality is rethought in the ambiguous, potential space between Lust and libido.}, language = {en} } @article{Dimen, author = {Dimen, Muriel}, title = {The engagement between psychoanalysis and feminism: A report from the front.}, series = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 33 (1997), pp. 527-548.}, journal = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 33 (1997), pp. 527-548.}, language = {en} } @article{Dimen, author = {Dimen, Muriel}, title = {Cultural and conceptual dissonance in theoretical practice. Commentary on Rosemarie P{\´e}rez Foster's >the bilingual self: duet in two voices<}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 05 (1995), pp. 157-163.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 05 (1995), pp. 157-163.}, language = {en} } @article{Dimen, author = {Dimen, Muriel}, title = {Classical Jung Meets Klein and Bion}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 04 (1994), pp. 069-100.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 04 (1994), pp. 069-100.}, abstract = {The way analysts talk, behave, and feel in relation to money is replete with an uneasiness that is the surface manifestation of a deep, psychocultural contradiction between money and love that cannot be thought, willed, or wished away. For the clinical project to succeed, this contradiction can and must find a temporary, reparative resolution in the paradox between love and hate. This essay takes up the question of money in the spirit of the Marx-Freud tradition, in postmodern perspective, and through several languages, not only psychoanalysis, but social theory, anthropology, and less centrally, feminist theory as well. It addresses money's unconscious and emotional resonance, and its cultural meanings money's clinical and theoretical vicissitudes in the context of cultural symbolism and economic change, as well as the class position of psychoanalysis and the psychology of class itself and money's relational meaning in transference and countertransference.}, language = {en} } @article{Dimen, author = {Dimen, Muriel}, title = {Attachment theory and the psychoanalytic tradition. Reflections on human relationality}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 03 (1993), pp. 301-308.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 03 (1993), pp. 301-308.}, language = {en} }