@book{Fromm, author = {Fromm, Erich}, title = {Anatomiya chelovecheskoy destruktivnosti (Анатомия человеческой деструктивности), Moskau (AST) 2020, 735 pp.}, number = {translation / {\"U}bersetzung}, language = {ru} } @book{Fromm, author = {Fromm, Erich}, title = {Anatomiya chelovecheskoy destruktivnosti (Анатомия человеческой деструктивности), Moskau (AST) 2016, 624 pp..}, number = {translation / {\"U}bersetzung}, language = {ru} } @misc{Fromm, author = {Fromm, Erich}, title = {Krizis psikhoanaliza (Кризис психоанализа), Moskau (AST) 2018.}, number = {translation / {\"U}bersetzung}, language = {ru} } @book{Fromm, author = {Fromm, Erich}, title = {Revolyutsiya nadezhdy (Революция надежды), Moskau (AST) 2018.}, number = {translation / {\"U}bersetzung}, language = {ru} } @book{Fromm, author = {Fromm, Erich}, title = {Revolyutsiya nadezhdy (Революция надежды), Moskau (AST) 2014.}, number = {translation / {\"U}bersetzung}, language = {ru} } @book{Fromm, author = {Fromm, Erich}, title = {Vy budete kak bogi (Вы будете как боги), Moskau (AST) 2015.}, number = {translation / {\"U}bersetzung}, language = {ru} } @book{Fromm, author = {Fromm, Erich}, title = {Dusha cheloveka (Душа человека), Moskau (AST) 2018.}, number = {translation / {\"U}bersetzung}, language = {ru} } @book{Fromm, author = {Fromm, Erich}, title = {Dusha cheloveka (Душа человека), Moskau (AST) 2014.}, number = {translation / {\"U}bersetzung}, language = {ru} } @book{Fromm, author = {Fromm, Erich}, title = {Iz plena illyuziy (Из плена иллюзий), Moskau (AST) 2017.}, number = {translation / {\"U}bersetzung}, language = {ru} } @book{Fromm, author = {Fromm, Erich}, title = {Dzen buddizm i psikhoanaliz (Дзен-буддизм и психоанализ), Moskau (AST) 2018.}, number = {translation / {\"U}bersetzung}, language = {ru} } @book{Fromm, author = {Fromm, Erich}, title = {Teoriya Zigmunda Freyda (Теория Зигмунда Фрейда), Moskau (AST) 2019.}, number = {translation / {\"U}bersetzung}, language = {ru} } @book{Fromm, author = {Fromm, Erich}, title = {Iskusstvo lyubit (Искусство любить), Moskau (AST) 2019.}, number = {translation / {\"U}bersetzung}, language = {ru} } @book{Fromm, author = {Fromm, Erich}, title = {Iskusstvo lyubit (Искусство любить), Moskau (AST) 2012.}, number = {translation / {\"U}bersetzung}, language = {ru} } @book{Fromm, author = {Fromm, Erich}, title = {Zdorovoe obshchestvo (Здоровое общество), Moskau (AST) 2019.}, number = {translation / {\"U}bersetzung}, language = {ru} } @book{Fromm, author = {Fromm, Erich}, title = {Zabytyy yazyk (Забытый язык), Moskau (AST) 2018.}, number = {translation / {\"U}bersetzung}, language = {ru} } @book{Fromm, author = {Fromm, Erich}, title = {Psikhoanaliz i religiya (Психоанализ и религия), Moskau (AST) 2018.}, number = {translation / {\"U}bersetzung}, language = {ru} } @book{Fromm, author = {Fromm, Erich}, title = {Chelovek dlya sebya (Человек для себя), Moskau (AST) 2020.}, number = {translation / {\"U}bersetzung}, language = {ru} } @book{Fromm, author = {Fromm, Erich}, title = {Chelovek dlya sebya (Человек для себя), Moskau (AST) 2014.}, number = {translation / {\"U}bersetzung}, language = {ru} } @book{Fromm, author = {Fromm, Erich}, title = {Begstvo ot svobody (Бегство от свободы), Moskau (AST) 2020.}, number = {translation / {\"U}bersetzung}, language = {ru} } @book{Fromm, author = {Fromm, Erich}, title = {Begstvo ot svobody (Бегство от свободы), Moskau (AST) 2015.}, number = {translation / {\"U}bersetzung}, language = {ru} } @article{Tsonkov, author = {Tsonkov, Georgi}, title = {Gumanism, antigumanism i technicheskaya revolyutsiya (Humanism, antihumanism and technical revolution)}, series = {Proceedings of the XVth World Congress of Philosophy, Vol. 3 (1974), pp. 293-296.}, journal = {Proceedings of the XVth World Congress of Philosophy, Vol. 3 (1974), pp. 293-296.}, language = {ru} } @article{Tsonkov, author = {Tsonkov, G.}, title = {Gumanism, antigumanism i technicheskaya revolyutsiya (Humanism, antihumanism and technical revolution).}, series = {Proceedings of the XVth World Congress of Philosophy, Vol. 3 (1974), pp. 293-296.}, journal = {Proceedings of the XVth World Congress of Philosophy, Vol. 3 (1974), pp. 293-296.}, language = {ru} } @article{Zhadanov, author = {Zhadanov, Mikhail Aleksandrovich}, title = {ЛЮБОВЬ КАК ВАЖНЕЙШИЙ ЭЛЕМЕНТ МЕДИЦИНСКОЙ КОРПОРАТИВНОЙ КУЛЬТУРЫ [Love as the Most Essential Element of Medical Corporate Culture]}, series = {Bulletin of Tomsk State University, No. 395 (2015), pp. 46-50.}, journal = {Bulletin of Tomsk State University, No. 395 (2015), pp. 46-50.}, abstract = {Проводится философско-культурологический анализ медицинской корпоративной культуры через призму одного из главных ее элементов любви. Автор отмечает процесс дегуманизации в современной системе оказания медицинской помощи и деонтологический кризис медицинской корпорации. Один из способов выхода из кризиса возвращение к этике любви врача к своему пациенту на новом уровне. Автором использован методологический подход Эриха Фромма, представляющий любовь как искусство, в котором необходимо совершенствоваться.}, language = {ru} } @article{Zarubinski, author = {Zarubinski, O. A.}, title = {K voprosu o sotsialʹno-psikhologicheskom fenomene A. Glitera. Na chem ostanovilsia i mimo chego proshel Erik Fromm}, series = {Voprosy germanskoĭ istorii, 1997, pp. 117-129.}, journal = {Voprosy germanskoĭ istorii, 1997, pp. 117-129.}, language = {ru} } @article{Yefimenko, author = {Yefimenko, Y. V.}, title = {Проблема отчуждения в философии Э. Фромма [The Problem of Alienation in Philosophy of Erich Fromm]}, series = {News of the Ural State University, Series 3 Social Sciences, Vol. 4 (No. 83, 2010), pp. 144-148.}, journal = {News of the Ural State University, Series 3 Social Sciences, Vol. 4 (No. 83, 2010), pp. 144-148.}, abstract = {Статья посвящена некоторым аспектам проблемы отчуждения в философии Э. Фромма. Рассматриваются возможные пути преодоления отчуждения, прослеживается взаимосвязь процессов снятия отчуждения и построения общества нового типа в творчестве Э. Фромма.}, language = {ru} } @article{Veniaminovna, author = {Veniaminovna, Sorina Galina}, title = {ДИАЛОГ СКВОЗЬ ВЕКА: ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛЬНОЕ КОММУНИКАТИВНОЕ ПРОСТРАНСТВО [Dialogue Through the Ages: Educational Communicative Space]}, series = {Electronic Scientific Edition Almanac Space and Time, Vol. 8 (No. 1, 2015) [no page numbers].}, journal = {Electronic Scientific Edition Almanac Space and Time, Vol. 8 (No. 1, 2015) [no page numbers].}, abstract = {Working with text suggests a kind of dialogue between readers and authors, which is especially important in the educational process. Regardless of when the text was written, each new reading can create its new life. Regardless of the form of representation (on paper or digital) every time in the process of education, classic text (under careful reading) raises questions and creates the conditions of dialogue through the centuries, which is the main feature of educational environment. Texts on the same issue could be written in different times and can express different points of view. So, the task for both students and skilled researchers is the ability to correlate various positions, to join with them in an equal dialogue considering features of the epoch text writing and the era to which the reader belongs. It is important not only to learn and remember the text. Researchers should be able to form their own position by comparing all this discordance. The subject of my article is essence and methodology of questioning the text as a special kind of text-based communication in educational process of critical thinking development. For this purpose, I use the technique of analytic questioning, as well as methods of system and discourse analysis, formal and modal logic. Applying these methods, on the examples of creative works of Immanuil Kant, Erich Fromm, Osip Mandelshtam, Alexander Pushkin, and Marina Tsvetaeva, I show how the authors of classical humanitarian texts used the practice of questioning to establish and strengthen their communication with the readers (current and future). In my article, I analyze Mandelshtam's, Pushkin's and Fromm's approach to questioning and compare their way of questioning with the Kantian one. On the example of Marina Tsvetaeva's essay >My Pushkin<, I also show the effect of poetic questioning (questioning of the author of poetic text to its reader) on the young reader in the process of forming his own worldview. As a possible tool for dialogue with the text in the educational process, I propose to use the methodology of expert work that was developed by me earlier. This methodology is a tool of modern educational communications, the way to dialogue with author regardless of the time of writing the analyzed text. Under this methodology, the student fixes the results of text analysis in his analytical report, which is an analytical table (such tables initially presuppose consistent dialogue with the text). Analytical report (analytical table) contains the following sections: (i) List of the basic concepts presented in the text, and their most important characteristics; (ii) Questions to the text; (iii) Reflections and comments; (iv) Possible associations and analogies related to the professional activities of the author of the report. In the process of expert work, formulating questions, engaging in dialogue with the text, students gain a new vision of the investigated text and studied disciplines. This vision is refined in the process of group discussion influenced by questions of other participants of practical training. I conclude that this methodology allows the creation of conditions for the formation of a consistent dialogue with the text on a regular basis. [Taken from Scientific Library Cyberlenika: http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/dialog-skvoz-veka-obrazovatelnoe-kommunikativnoe-prostranstvo]}, language = {ru} } @article{Teljatinkowa, author = {Teljatinkowa, E. M.}, title = {Erich Fromm, biografitscheskaja sprawka}, series = {E. Fromm, Anatomija tschelowetscheskoi destruktiwnosti, Moskau (Isdatelstwo >Republika') 1994, pp. 434-437.}, journal = {E. Fromm, Anatomija tschelowetscheskoi destruktiwnosti, Moskau (Isdatelstwo >Republika') 1994, pp. 434-437.}, language = {ru} } @article{Ivanov, author = {Ivanov, Andrey Valerievich}, title = {ФИЛОСОФИЯ ОТЧУЖДЕНИЯ И КОНФЛИКТА В ИСТОРИОСОФИИ М.О. ГЕРШЕНЗОНА [The Philosophy of Alienation and Conflict in Historiosophie of M. O. Gershenzon]}, series = {Scientific Notes (Khujand State University), Vol. 43 (No. 1, 2015), pp. 31-35.}, journal = {Scientific Notes (Khujand State University), Vol. 43 (No. 1, 2015), pp. 31-35.}, abstract = {В статье рассматривается философия отчуждения и философия конфликта в историософской проблематике одного из участников сборника >Вехи< 1909 года Михаила Осиповича Гершензона, который был одним из первых критиков >массовой культуры<. Показано историко-философское осмысление феномена отчуждения в эпоху Модерна от Гегеля, Маркса до ключевой работы Гершензона >Тройственный образ совершенства<, где проблема отчуждения исследователем интерпретируется не через отчуждение трудом или религией, а через отчуждение культурой. Дилемма Гершензона >создавать или ощущать< как основной конфликт человечества предвосхитила дилемму Э.Фромма >иметь или быть<. В статье демонстрируется, что Гершензон М.О. опередил ряд положений, изложенных в работах Г.Маркузе, Э.Фромма, Х.Ортеги-и-Гассета в плане критики массовой культуры и отчуждения человеческого бытия.}, language = {ru} } @article{VolkRostovtseva, author = {Volk, S. S. and Rostovtseva, N. D.}, title = {Krizis sotsiologii Frankfurtskoi shkoly [The Crisis of Sociology of the Frankfurt School,}, series = {Vestnik Leningradskogo Universiteta, Ekonomika-filosofiya-pravo Vol. 30 (No. 4 (23), 1975), pp. 144-147.}, journal = {Vestnik Leningradskogo Universiteta, Ekonomika-filosofiya-pravo Vol. 30 (No. 4 (23), 1975), pp. 144-147.}, abstract = {A review of Sotsialnaia filosofiia Frankfurtskoi shkoly: kriticheskie ocherki ( The Social Philosophy of the Frankfurt School: The Critical Essays, Moskva-Mysl, Praga-Svoboda, 1975). This is the first fundamental attempt in Soviet philosophical literature to analyze one of the most influential schools in modern bourgeois philosophy. H. Marcuse, E. FROMM, T. Adorno, Horkheimer, Habermas, and K. Offe are the main representatives of this school. The chronological identification of the school, consisting of three phases in its development, is considered to be successful. Criticism of Czechoslovak and Jugoslav revisionists is praised. The criticism of left rebel H. Marcuse is overly simplified. His revolution, changes in his views, and the substantial contradiction in his last works should have played a more important part in the book. The main success of the book is in its ability to demonstrate the small bourgeois character of the Frankfurt school, the subjective and idealistic principles of its theories, and total bankruptcy of its guidelines.}, language = {ru} } @article{RostovtsevaVolk, author = {Rostovtseva, N. D. and Volk, S. S.}, title = {Krizis sotsiologii Frankfurtskoi shkoly [The Crisis of Sociology of the Frankfurt School,}, series = {Vestnik Leningradskogo Universiteta, Ekonomika-filosofiya-pravo Vol. 30 (No. 4 (23), 1975), pp. 144-147.}, journal = {Vestnik Leningradskogo Universiteta, Ekonomika-filosofiya-pravo Vol. 30 (No. 4 (23), 1975), pp. 144-147.}, language = {ru} } @article{Roschtschin, author = {Roschtschin, S. K.}, title = {Dwa lizi Ericha Fromma (Two Faces of Erich Fromm),}, series = {Voprosy psichologii, Moskva No. 2 (1976), pp. 32-41 (English summary at the end).}, journal = {Voprosy psichologii, Moskva No. 2 (1976), pp. 32-41 (English summary at the end).}, abstract = {Presented is a critical analysis of E. FROMM's The Anatomy of Human Destructiveness (London, 1974), with respect to his contradictory approach to the question of the biological foundation of psychology and his abuse of quotations of and references to Marx. In FROMM's own critical analysis of K. Lorenz, S. Freud, and B. F. Skinner, he presents persuasive arguments based on impressive data from different modern sciences, against the instinctive and mechanistic theories of human nature. But when establishing his own position, he draws the same biologically based conclusions as his opponents, although he expresses them in different terms. Furthermore, in attempting to make Marx an ally of his own views, he succeeds only in misquoting or misconstruing Marx: he quotes Marx only in order to compliment him or when the quote is neutral with respect to his own ideas, or when actually citing Marx in support of his own views, he gives his own, rather imprecise interpretation of Marx.}, language = {ru} } @article{Rokityanskiy, author = {Rokityanskiy, V. R.}, title = {Etika Freydisma. Psikhoanaliticheskiy Ideal Cheloveka v Izobrazheniy Sovremenih Amerikanskih Interpretatorov Naslediya Freyda [The Ethic of Freudianism. The Psychoanalytical Ideal of Man in Contemporary American Interpreters of Freud's Heritage,}, series = {Voprosy filosofii, Vol. 29 (No. 6, 1975), pp. 132-139.}, journal = {Voprosy filosofii, Vol. 29 (No. 6, 1975), pp. 132-139.}, abstract = {The teachings of S. Freud have penetrated, in their various versions, into every pore of American culture, though not all partisans of psychoanalysis recognize the validity of the >Freudian ethic.< However, the admission that psychoanalysis pays attention to human values was made by one of its greatest theoreticians, H. Hartman. Additional confirmations of the presumed moralistic character of psychoanalysis, in spite of the insistence of its founder or rigorous scientific premises, are made by P. Rieff in >The Mind of the Moralist,< and E. FROMM in >Sigmund Freud's Mission,< (no publication information available). These attempts to formulate an ethical content in Freud's work contradict his persistent refusal to make value judgments himself. The variations in the interpretation of Freud in America are a reflection of the pluralism born of the social contradictions of US society. At the same time, the broad influence exercised by psychoanalysis over the American intelligentsia is such that American social science attempts to solve many of its tasks using the language and concepts of psychoanalysis.}, language = {ru} } @article{Popova, author = {Popova, M. A.}, title = {S. Freud and his religious interpretation today (Russian),}, series = {Vestnik Moskowkogo Universitate - Filosofija, Moskva No. 2 (1975), pp. 62-73.}, journal = {Vestnik Moskowkogo Universitate - Filosofija, Moskva No. 2 (1975), pp. 62-73.}, language = {ru} } @article{Mitin, author = {Mitin, M. B.}, title = {Problema >Gumanizatsii< Tekhniki i Sotsialny Progress [The Problem of the >Humanization< of Technology and Social Progress]}, series = {Voprosy filosofii, Vol. 27 (No. 4, Apr 1973) pp. 79-93.}, journal = {Voprosy filosofii, Vol. 27 (No. 4, Apr 1973) pp. 79-93.}, abstract = {An examination of the problem of the humanization of technological progress with an analysis of the main Western approaches to the problem and a presentation of the Marxist approach. The aspects of the problem considered include the role of technology in historical development, the positive and negative consequences of its utilization, changes brought about in living conditions by the scientific and technological revolution, limits and possibilities of revolutionary reforms of society on the basis of technological progress, the situation of the individual and the prospects for development of the personality in a technologized world. Ontological, epistemological and psychological difficulties arise when attempting to analyze the literature on the problem.}, language = {ru} } @article{Lejbin, author = {Lejbin, V. M.}, title = {Psikhoanaliticheskaia traktovka struktury lichnosti i neofreidistskaia kontsepsiia samosti [The Psychoanalytic Treatment of the Structure of Personality and the Neo-Freudian Concept of Self]}, series = {Voprosy filosofii, Vol. 31 (No. 6, 1977) pp. 148-158.}, journal = {Voprosy filosofii, Vol. 31 (No. 6, 1977) pp. 148-158.}, abstract = {Biancoli presents a case study illustrating an application of E. FROMM's theoretical concepts to clinical work. The case ...is of a young woman torn between an unstable, aggressive, and impulsive attitude and a desire to form lasting and loving relationships; the case history takes us through the difficult steps that gradually lead the patient to a better understanding of the origin of this conflict and the transferential testing of the analyst. Biancoli points out that FROMM saw the role of ...psychoanalysis as articulating >real possibilities< or progressive change. This discovery of alternatives in the consulting room requires from analyst and analysand alike a realistic assessment of internal or external contraints--inherent in any specific situation--and a willingness to forgo illusory or unrealistic plans for change. A commentary by Ana Maria Barroso follows this chapter.}, language = {ru} } @article{Gurjevitch, author = {Gurjevitch, P. S.}, title = {Rasryschitelnoe b tscheloveke kak tajny}, series = {E. Fromm, Anatomija tschelowetscheskoi destruktiwnosti, Moskau (Isdatelstwo >Republika') 1994, pp. 3-14.}, journal = {E. Fromm, Anatomija tschelowetscheskoi destruktiwnosti, Moskau (Isdatelstwo >Republika') 1994, pp. 3-14.}, language = {ru} } @article{Fedulow, author = {Fedulow, S.}, title = {Sozialnej psichoanalis i situazija w obschtschestwe}, series = {Russkaja Misle, Moskau No. 3879 (17. 5. 1991) pp. 11; No. 3880 (24. 5. 1991) pp. 11; No. 3881 (31. 5. 1991) pp. 11; No. 3882 (7. 6. 1991) pp. 11.}, journal = {Russkaja Misle, Moskau No. 3879 (17. 5. 1991) pp. 11; No. 3880 (24. 5. 1991) pp. 11; No. 3881 (31. 5. 1991) pp. 11; No. 3882 (7. 6. 1991) pp. 11.}, language = {ru} } @article{Fedoseyev, author = {Fedoseyev, P. N.}, title = {Kultura i Moral [Culture and Morals,}, series = {Voprosy filosofii, Vol. 27 (No. 4, Spring 1973), pp. 23-41.}, journal = {Voprosy filosofii, Vol. 27 (No. 4, Spring 1973), pp. 23-41.}, abstract = {An essay on the correlation of culture and morals, presented from the Marxist standpoint, with a critique of contemporary bourgeois philosophical theories; intuitivist ethics (G. E. Moore, C. D. Broad, E. S. Ewing, B. Blanchard, E. Hall); logical postivism and linguistic analysis (C. Stevenson, A. Ayer, P. G. Nowell-Smith); existentialism (J.-P. Sartre, K. Jaspers); abstract humanism (Erich FROMM and Charles Reich); neoprotestantism (K. Barth, R. Niebuhr, P. Tillich, and others). These theories take a nonhistorical, nonclass approach to culture and civilization. An awareness of the alienation of man in present-day capitalist society and of the pernicious effects of industrialization and scientific and technological advances on human beings and their environment has produced deep pessimism among many bourgeois philosophers. The most vivid negative concepts of culture and civilization have been set forth in the works of Y. Ellul and L. Mumford. While all of the above authors have produced excellent exposes of capitalist society, they have reached an impasse and see no way out except rejection of scientific and technological progress. The Marxist approach to the interrelation of culture and morals is a concrete-historical one. Marxism does not reject universal moral criteria in human relations. On the contrary, he stresses their significance, but objects to the blurring of the class nature of morals, and to regarding abstract moral principles as the magic solution to all problems. Considerable attention is given to the meaning and development of culture in socialist and communist societies, where the socioeconomic conditions foster the harmonious development of man. Assertions that communists believe in moral nihilism, that the end justifies the means, and that moral values are relative are vigorously denied, and Lenin, Marx, and Engels are quoted to prove that positive ends must be achieved by positive means. Maoist practice is termed as an example of the end justifies the means policy.}, language = {ru} } @article{Eross, author = {Eross, C.}, title = {The Ideas of Erich Fromm (russian)}, series = {Voprosy Filosofic (UdSSR), No. 6 (1970), pp. 86-95.}, journal = {Voprosy Filosofic (UdSSR), No. 6 (1970), pp. 86-95.}, language = {ru} } @article{Erjos, author = {Erjos, Rainer}, title = {Ocherk kontseptsii E. Fromma [Essay on the conceptions of E. Fromm]}, series = {Voprosy filosofii, Vol. 24 (No. 6, 1970) pp. 86-95.}, journal = {Voprosy filosofii, Vol. 24 (No. 6, 1970) pp. 86-95.}, language = {ru} } @article{Zdravomyslova, author = {Zdravomyslova, E. A.}, title = {Sotsiologicheskie podkhody k analizu obshchestvennykh dvizheniy [Sociological Approaches to the Analysis of Social Movements],}, series = {Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya, Vol. 17 (No. 7, 1990), pp. 88-94.}, journal = {Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya, Vol. 17 (No. 7, 1990), pp. 88-94.}, abstract = {A review of the main theoretical approaches to the study of social movements in Western societies. The predominant models of the 1960s were the theories of collective behavior and mass society as conceptualized by Erich FROMM, U. Kornhauser, Herbert Blumer, S. M. Lipset, etc, which assume the empirical framework of a democratic society based on the consensus of various group inter-ests, but also the instability of primary social groups and social isolation of individuals. Criticisms directed toward these theories are discussed. Resource mobilization theory emerged in the 1970s, conceptualized by I. McCarthy, M. Zald, A. Oberschall, etc, and assuming that social movements are based on existing institutions that facilitate social change. Social organization for change adopts the goals of the institutions of the dominant culture, but attributes different values to them and seeks different means for their implementation. Both external (level of legal state development, financial and social potential) and internal (groups involved, time spent on organization, money) factors determine the success of social movements. Western social movments of the 1980s are characterized by larger groups with varied interests, reflecting the globalization of the society itself, and calling for new structural theoretical models.}, language = {ru} } @article{WessonowGarskijJakowlew, author = {Wessonow, W. G. and Garskij, I. S. and Jakowlew, M. W.}, title = {Konzepzija tscheloweka w filosofii Ericha Fromma}, series = {Socialnaja filosofija Frankfurtskoy schkole, Moskwa 1975, pp. 209-229.}, journal = {Socialnaja filosofija Frankfurtskoy schkole, Moskwa 1975, pp. 209-229.}, language = {ru} } @book{Wertschenow, author = {Wertschenow, L. H.}, title = {Kritika sozialnoi teorii Erika Fromma [Kritik der Gesellschaftstheorie Erich Fromms, Moskau 1969.}, language = {ru} } @book{Vassin, author = {Vassin, V.}, title = {11. Sapowed [The Eleventh Commandment), Moskau (TOO >Kirilliza<) 1994, 160 p.}, language = {ru} } @book{Tschepnenko, author = {Tschepnenko, W. A.}, title = {Polititscheskaja philosophija i ekonomitscheskije bsgljage Erika Fromma [Politische Philosophie und {\"o}konomische Ansichten Erich Fromms, Moskau 1969.}, language = {ru} } @article{Telyatnikova, author = {Telyatnikova, E. M.}, title = {Radical Humanism of Erich Fromm}, series = {Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya, No. 6, 1992, pp. 113-120.}, journal = {Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya, No. 6, 1992, pp. 113-120.}, language = {ru} } @book{Sokolov, author = {Sokolov, E.}, title = {Wedenje w Psichoanalis, St. Petersburg (Isdatelstwo >Lan<) 1999, 318 pp. - chapter on Fromm pp. 267-316.}, language = {ru} } @article{Slobodyanik, author = {Slobodyanik, A. D.}, title = {Psychotherapy, Suggestion, Hypnosis (russian), Kiew (Zdorovya) 1966.}, language = {ru} } @article{Schwarzman, author = {Schwarzman, K. A.}, title = {Gymanistitscheskaja etika E. Fromma [Die humanistische Ethik Erich Fromms}, series = {Woprose Philosophii, No. 6 (1971), pp. 100ff.}, journal = {Woprose Philosophii, No. 6 (1971), pp. 100ff.}, language = {ru} } @article{Rumjanzewa, author = {Rumjanzewa, A. G.}, title = {Das Problem der Aggressivit{\"a}t in der Philosophie des Neofreudismus}, series = {A. G. Rumjanzewa, Krititscheskij analis konzepzij >tschelowetscheskoi aggressivnosti,< Minsk 1982, pp. 79-121.}, journal = {A. G. Rumjanzewa, Krititscheskij analis konzepzij >tschelowetscheskoi aggressivnosti,< Minsk 1982, pp. 79-121.}, language = {ru} }