@book{Fromm, author = {Fromm, Erich}, title = {Imet ili beth, Moskau (Isdatelstwo AST) 2006, 318 pp.}, number = {reprint / Nachdruck}, language = {ru} } @book{Fromm, author = {Fromm, Erich}, title = {Imeth ili beth?, Moskau rogress) 1990.}, number = {translation / {\"U}bersetzung}, language = {ru} } @book{Fromm, author = {Fromm, Erich}, title = {Imet ili beth, Kiew (Serie >Posnanie<, Nika-Zentr) 1998.}, number = {reprint / Nachdruck}, language = {ru} } @article{Roschtschin, author = {Roschtschin, S. K.}, title = {Dwa lizi Ericha Fromma (Two Faces of Erich Fromm),}, series = {Voprosy psichologii, Moskva No. 2 (1976), pp. 32-41 (English summary at the end).}, journal = {Voprosy psichologii, Moskva No. 2 (1976), pp. 32-41 (English summary at the end).}, abstract = {Presented is a critical analysis of E. FROMM's The Anatomy of Human Destructiveness (London, 1974), with respect to his contradictory approach to the question of the biological foundation of psychology and his abuse of quotations of and references to Marx. In FROMM's own critical analysis of K. Lorenz, S. Freud, and B. F. Skinner, he presents persuasive arguments based on impressive data from different modern sciences, against the instinctive and mechanistic theories of human nature. But when establishing his own position, he draws the same biologically based conclusions as his opponents, although he expresses them in different terms. Furthermore, in attempting to make Marx an ally of his own views, he succeeds only in misquoting or misconstruing Marx: he quotes Marx only in order to compliment him or when the quote is neutral with respect to his own ideas, or when actually citing Marx in support of his own views, he gives his own, rather imprecise interpretation of Marx.}, language = {ru} } @book{Fromm, author = {Fromm, Erich}, title = {Imet ili byt? (Иметь или быть?), Moskau (AST) 2014, 320 pp.}, number = {translation / {\"U}bersetzung}, language = {ru} } @book{Fromm, author = {Fromm, Erich}, title = {Imet ili byt? (Иметь или быть?), Moskau (AST) 2014, 320 pp.}, number = {translation / {\"U}bersetzung}, language = {ru} } @article{Popova, author = {Popova, M. A.}, title = {>Gumanisticheskaya religiya< Erikha Fromma i tupiki burzhuaznogo gumanizma [The >Humanistic Religion< of Erich Fromm and the Impasse of Bourgeois}, series = {Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta, Filosofiya, Vol. 31 (No. 5, Sept.-Oct. 1976), pp. 82-93.}, journal = {Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta, Filosofiya, Vol. 31 (No. 5, Sept.-Oct. 1976), pp. 82-93.}, abstract = {Erich Fromm's fortuitous visit to M{\´e}xico in 1949, and his meeting with a group of Mexican psychiatrists was the beginning of a working relationship that lasted for over 25 years. It left its mark on a number of community-oriented institutions, professional societies and publications, which are alive even today. This article describes some of the many activities in which researchers, psychoanalysts, medical doctors, psychologists, social workers, sociologists, anthropologists and re-ligious scholars were involved over those 25 years, and the continuing importance of those initial projects and institutions today.}, language = {ru} }