@article{Wu, author = {Wu, Ronghua}, title = {Comments on Fromm's Social Sound Theory [评弗洛姆的社会健全理论]}, series = {Social Sciences in Guangdong [广东社会科学], No. 2 (1994), pp. 53-57.}, journal = {Social Sciences in Guangdong [广东社会科学], No. 2 (1994), pp. 53-57.}, abstract = {评弗洛姆的社会健全理论伍荣华纵观国内外对于社会问题的研究,西方学者一般都持批判的态度,即指出或评击社会弊病的较多,这方面可见之于萨特和法兰克福学派。而弗洛姆却从哲学的角度,用社会分析和心理分析的方法,对社会伦理与人本伦理作了透彻的分析,不仅指出了人类...}, language = {zh} } @article{WuGao, author = {Wu, Ronghua and Gao, Handong}, title = {Fromm's and Sartre's Freedom - Brief View on Similarities and Differences [弗洛姆与萨特自由观异同管窥]}, series = {Journal of Xiangtan University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) [湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版)], No. 4 (1996), pp. 104-108.}, journal = {Journal of Xiangtan University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) [湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版)], No. 4 (1996), pp. 104-108.}, abstract = {文章就弗洛好与萨特自由观之异同进行了评析。在似同方面,二者都立足于个体本位上的自由,均认为现代人享有自由,但对自由却采取逃避的态度,说明现代人拥有自由的缺陷性和病态性,应帮助人类走上自由的正道。差异之处,首先,他们对自由概念的理解不同。萨特的自由本质上是一种意识活动的自由,并没有现实性;弗洛姆则把自由理解为个人人格、意志摆脱条件制约的独立;其次,他们对人类自由正道实现的途径存在分歧,萨特主张个人自由融入某种形式的集团共同意愿中;弗洛姆则试图用>爱<和>工作<来建立个人与社会与自然的和谐关系,在和谐关系中享有健康的自由。}, language = {zh} }