@article{Samuels, author = {Samuels, Andrew}, title = {Reply to Adam Phillips}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 10 (2000), pp. 277-280.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 10 (2000), pp. 277-280.}, language = {en} } @article{Rotenberg, author = {Rotenberg, Carl T.}, title = {Psychodynamic Psychotherapy and Executive Coaching - Overlapping Paradigms}, series = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 28 (2000), pp. 653-664.}, journal = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 28 (2000), pp. 653-664.}, language = {en} } @misc{Rotenberg, author = {Rotenberg, Carl T.}, title = {Review Donna M. Orange, George E. Atwood, and Robert D. Stolorow: Working Intersubjectively: Contextualism in Psychoanalytic Practice}, series = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 28 (2000), pp. 564-566.}, journal = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 28 (2000), pp. 564-566.}, language = {en} } @misc{Robinson, author = {Robinson, Lillian H.}, title = {Review Althea Horner: Chrysalis}, series = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 28 (2000), pp. 177.}, journal = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 28 (2000), pp. 177.}, language = {en} } @article{RichardsRichards, author = {Richards, A. K. and Richards, A. D.}, title = {Benjamin Wolstein and us: Many roads lead to Rome.}, series = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 36 (2000), pp. 255-266.}, journal = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 36 (2000), pp. 255-266.}, language = {en} } @article{Renik, author = {Renik, Owen}, title = {Benjamin Wolstein.}, series = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 36 (2000), pp. 251-254.}, journal = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 36 (2000), pp. 251-254.}, language = {en} } @article{Reisner, author = {Reisner, Steven}, title = {Reply to commentary}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 10 (2000), pp. 795-813.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 10 (2000), pp. 795-813.}, abstract = {Ceccoli (1999a) argues that, because of their capacity for maternity, women analysts are capable of certain interventions that men are not. Taking issue with such assertions, this commentary argues that although the gendered metaphors of psychoanalytic intervention have changed usefully since Freud's paternalistic imagery, in favor of the maternal language of Klein and Winnicott, these metaphors are regressive if their value as symbolism is undermined. Ceccoli's case study is revisited and reevaluated to posit an alternative view: that theory is sometimes employed to fill gaps that might be more productively tolerated in the service of the analysis. It is argued that Ceccoli's use of Kristevan theory to support an essentialist position that translocates the paternal phallus into the female analysts' >gendered, bodily specificity … on the basis of our capacity for maternity< (p. 695) is an example of such a use of theory.}, language = {en} } @misc{Reis, author = {Reis, B. E.}, title = {Book review. The reproduction of evil: A clinical and cultural perspective.}, series = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 36 (2000), pp. 730-734.}, journal = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 36 (2000), pp. 730-734.}, language = {en} } @article{Rangell, author = {Rangell, Leo}, title = {Reply to Bromberg}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 10 (2000), pp. 309-313.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 10 (2000), pp. 309-313.}, language = {en} } @article{Pizer, author = {Pizer, Stuart A.}, title = {Relational Trouble: Reply to Commentaries}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 10 (2000), pp. 247-259.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 10 (2000), pp. 247-259.}, language = {en} } @article{Pizer, author = {Pizer, Stuart A.}, title = {Reflections on effective provision. Commentary on John Lindon's >gratification and provision in psychoanalysis<}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 10 (2000), pp. 195-196.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 10 (2000), pp. 195-196.}, language = {en} } @article{Pizer, author = {Pizer, Barbara}, title = {Reflections on Flat Mountain}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 10 (2000), pp. 197-207.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 10 (2000), pp. 197-207.}, language = {en} } @article{Pellegrini, author = {Pellegrini, Ann}, title = {Reply to commentary}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 10 (2000), pp. 701-712.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 10 (2000), pp. 701-712.}, language = {en} } @article{Orfanos, author = {Orfanos, Spyros D.}, title = {Reply to Blechner, Lesser, and Schwartz}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 10 (2000), pp. 303-307.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 10 (2000), pp. 303-307.}, abstract = {I detest the man who is the object of your study: as far as a single individual can be responsible for the misery of this part of the world, he surely is [Freud on Woodrow Wilson, 1920].}, language = {en} } @article{Olsson, author = {Olsson, Peter A.}, title = {A Psychoanalytic Study of Integrity and >Good Character<}, series = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 28 (2000), pp. 397-408.}, journal = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 28 (2000), pp. 397-408.}, language = {en} } @article{Ogden, author = {Ogden, Thomas H.}, title = {Reply to commentaries}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 10 (2000), pp. 371-375.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 10 (2000), pp. 371-375.}, language = {en} } @article{Ogden, author = {Ogden, Thomas H.}, title = {Psychotic developments in a sexually abused borderline patient. Commentary on paper by Paul Williams}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 10 (2000), pp. 065-088.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 10 (2000), pp. 065-088.}, abstract = {In this paper, I explore >the art of mourning< in the course of discussing two Borges prose poems, >Pierre Menard, Author of the Quixote< (1941) and >Borges and I< (1957), both of which were written soon after Borges suffered enormous emotional losses. I suggest that successful mourning centrally involves a demand that we make on ourselves to create something - whether it be a memory, a dream, a story, a poem, a response to a poem - that begins to meet, to be equal to, the full complexity of our relationship to what has been lost and to the experience of loss itself. Paradoxically, in this process, we are enlivened by the experience of loss and death, even when what is given up or is taken from us is an aspect of ourselves.}, language = {en} } @article{NemiroffSchindlerSchreiber, author = {Nemiroff, H. and Schindler, R. and Schreiber, A.}, title = {An interpersonal psychoanalytic approach to testing adult survivors of childhood sexual abuse.}, series = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 36 (2000), pp. 665-684.}, journal = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 36 (2000), pp. 665-684.}, language = {en} } @article{Mitchell, author = {Mitchell, Stephen A.}, title = {Reply to commentary}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 10 (2000), pp. 713-733.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 10 (2000), pp. 713-733.}, abstract = {The experience of self is partially a narrative of one's history without memory, there is no self. Central to personal histories are accounts of significant relationships and their successes and failures. Accounts of failed relationships tend to gravitate toward two narrative themes: selfpity and guilt. This essay explores some aspects of the nature of guilt and self-pity, the different forms in which they surface, and their relationship to each other.}, language = {en} } @article{Mitchell, author = {Mitchell, Stephen A.}, title = {Reply to Commentaries}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 10 (2000), pp. 505-507.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 10 (2000), pp. 505-507.}, language = {en} }