@article{Druck, author = {Druck, Andrew B.}, title = {Reply to discussion by Enid Balint}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 10 (2000), pp. 889-907.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 10 (2000), pp. 889-907.}, abstract = {This commentary addresses two themes: parallels between religious and psychoanalytic education and the question of group survival in a world of competitive groups, whether religious (>strict< vs. >weak<) or psychoanalytic (differing psychoanalytic approaches). >Strict< religious education involves teaching both critical thinking and identification with the particular religion. This blend of critical thinking and identification with psychoanalysis is crucial in psychoanalytic education. We want to graduate students who see themselves as psychoanalysts rather than as being >interested< in psychoanalysis. This goal is accomplished when students have close, positive experience with personal analysts, supervisors, and teachers who are strongly committed to psychoanalysis but in a manner that encourages students to think critically and find their own psychoanalytic perspective. With regard to the second theme, I discuss how our narcissistic commitment to one or another psychoanalytic model interferes with open integration of new insights. Individual analysts privately integrate competing ideas in their own idiosyncratic ways. When these individuals publicly represent competing psychoanalytic groups, however, they tend to emphasize differences among these groups. They then find ways to appropriate new ideas as extensions of their own evolving tradition. In this way, a theoretical school is able to integrate new developments while preserving its own identity.}, language = {en} } @article{DuBose, author = {DuBose, Todd}, title = {Lordship, Bondage, and the Formation of Homo Religiosus}, series = {Journal of Religion and Health, Vol. 39, No. 3 (2000), pp. 217-226. [Online ISSN 1573-6571] [doi.org/10.1023/A:1010306523093]}, journal = {Journal of Religion and Health, Vol. 39, No. 3 (2000), pp. 217-226. [Online ISSN 1573-6571] [doi.org/10.1023/A:1010306523093]}, abstract = {After a brief exploration of Hegel's writing on the formation of self-consciousness, including the place of religiosity in this formation, the article examines Kojeve's response to a Hegelian homo religiosus, followed by a counter-response to Kojeve's atheism through a peculiar, Jaspersian reading of Erich Fromm's discussion of the >X< experience. Finally, it will be argued that the desire for mutual recognition, and humanity's yearning for transcendence, are essential experiences in the formation of self-consciousness.}, language = {en} } @article{Dunayevskaya, author = {Dunayevskaya, Raya}, title = {News and Letters, Detroit (No. 3, 2000). Typoscript from the Internet, 4 p. - http://www.newsandletters.org/Issues/2000/March/3.2000_rd.htm}, language = {en} } @article{DyessDean, author = {Dyess, Cynthia and Dean, Tim}, title = {Reply to commentary}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 10 (2000), pp. 787-794.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 10 (2000), pp. 787-794.}, abstract = {This. Reply to the commentaries by Corbett, Hansell, and Stern explores whether Lacan's concept of the real can - or should - be translated into more readily recognizable terms. It extends our previous discussion of impossibility by arguing that not all ideas and experiences can be brought within the realm of the known and familiar. We suggest that impossibilities of meaning should not be understood primarily in phenomenological terms, and we demur from the assessment that our concept of impossibility offers nothing for clinical work. Claiming that what resists meaning also impedes relationality, we encourage relational theorists to address the nonrelational processes that subtend relationality, including the relation between analyst and patient. We acknowledge that the theory of impossibility - or what we now call >negative mediation< - raises a fundamental challenge to relational theory, but we insist that disruptions of relationality need not be considered pathological. Taking into account the nonrelational may enhance rather than impoverish relational psychoanalysis.}, language = {en} } @article{DyessDean, author = {Dyess, Cynthia and Dean, Tim}, title = {Reply to commentary}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 10 (2000), pp. 735-756.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 10 (2000), pp. 735-756.}, abstract = {This paper offers an antiessentialist, psychoanalytic account of gender by arguing against Butler's deconstructive critique of gender essentialism. We develop an alternative to Butler's conception of gender as performative by focusing on those aspects of gender that resist meaning and representation. Using Lacan's concept of the real, we argue that any viable theory of gender must account for the limit conditions of cultural discourses that constitute subjectivity and sociality. Once gender is understood in terms not of proliferating possibilities for meaning, but of a certain impossibility of meaning, then gender's bearing on human relationality requires reconceptualizing. Claiming that various cultural narratives about gender (including traditional psychoanalytic narratives) should be recognized as symptomatic attempts to come to terms with a fundamental impossibility at the heart of sexual difference, we conclude by suggesting ways in which psychoanalysis may productively illuminate the failures of meaning that structure human relationality.}, language = {en} } @misc{EckardtHorney, author = {Eckardt Horney, Marianne}, title = {Review Steven D. Axelrod: Work and the Evolving Self: Theoretical and Clinical Considerations}, series = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 28 (2000), pp. 736-738}, journal = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 28 (2000), pp. 736-738}, language = {en} } @article{EckardtHorney, author = {Eckardt Horney, Marianne}, title = {Infinite Variety and Complexity: An Urgent Challenge for Psychoanalysis}, series = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 28 (2000), pp. 577-586.}, journal = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 28 (2000), pp. 577-586.}, language = {en} } @article{EckardtHorney, author = {Eckardt Horney, Marianne}, title = {The Impossible Ideal: A Patient-Oriented Therapy. Paper presented at the IFPS XI International Forum in New York, May 4-7, 2000. Typescript 12 p.}, number = {unpublished version / unver{\"o}ffentlichte Fassung}, language = {en} } @article{Ehrenberg, author = {Ehrenberg, Darlene Bregman}, title = {Potential impasse as analytic opportunity: Interactive considerations.}, series = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 36 (2000), pp. 573-586.}, journal = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 36 (2000), pp. 573-586.}, language = {en} } @article{Ehrenberg, author = {Ehrenberg, Darlene Bregman}, title = {Boundaries and Risks: Working with Erotic Transfernece. Paper presented at the IFPS XI International Forum in New York, May 4-7, 2000. Typescript 18 p.}, number = {unpublished version / unver{\"o}ffentlichte Fassung}, language = {en} } @article{Ehrlich, author = {Ehrlich, F. M.}, title = {Dialogue, couple therapy, and the unconscious.}, series = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 36 (2000), pp. 483-504.}, journal = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 36 (2000), pp. 483-504.}, language = {en} } @misc{Einsohn, author = {Einsohn, H. I.}, title = {Review Funk, R.: Erich Fromm - Liebe zum Leben (English edition)}, series = {Choice, December 2000, pp. 782-783.}, journal = {Choice, December 2000, pp. 782-783.}, language = {en} } @article{Eisold, author = {Eisold, Kenneth}, title = {The rediscovery of the unknown: An inquiry into psychoanalytic praxis.}, series = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 36 (2000), pp. 057-075.}, journal = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 36 (2000), pp. 057-075.}, language = {en} } @misc{Eisold, author = {Eisold, Kenneth}, title = {Book review. Lay analysis: Life inside the controversy.}, series = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 36 (2000), pp. 369-371.}, journal = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 36 (2000), pp. 369-371.}, language = {en} } @article{Eisold, author = {Eisold, Kenneth}, title = {Reply to discussions of Oedipus and Beyond}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 10 (2000), pp. 909-915.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 10 (2000), pp. 909-915.}, language = {en} } @article{Eisold, author = {Eisold, Kenneth}, title = {The Culture of Work. Paper presented at the IFPS XI International Forum in New York, May 4-7, 2000. Typescript 10 p.}, number = {unpublished version / unver{\"o}ffentlichte Fassung}, language = {en} } @article{Ellman, author = {Ellman, Steven J.}, title = {Recognition of Difference in the Author-Discussant Relation: Reply to Commentary}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 10 (2000), pp. 143-157.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 10 (2000), pp. 143-157.}, language = {en} } @article{EngHan, author = {Eng, David L. and Han, Shinhee}, title = {Reply to commentary}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 10 (2000), pp. 667-700.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 10 (2000), pp. 667-700.}, abstract = {As Freud's privileged theory of unresolved grief, melancholia presents a compelling framework to conceptualize registers of loss and depression attendant to both psychic and material processes of Asian American immigration, assimilation, and racialization. Freud initially formulates melancholia as a pathological form of individual mourning for lost objects, places, or ideals. However, we propose a concept of melancholia as a depathologized structure of everyday group experience for Asian Americans. We analyze a number of Asian American cultural productions (literature and film) as well as two case histories of university students involving intergenerational conflicts and lost ideals of whiteness, Asianness, home, and language. Exploring these analyses against Klein's notions of lost objects, we propose a more refined theory of good and bad racialized objects. This theory raises the psychic and political difficulties of reinstatement and the mediation of the depressive position for Asian Americans. In addition, this theory suggests that processes of immigration, assimilation, and racialization are neither pathological nor permanent but involve the fluid negotiation between mourning and melancholia. Throughout this essay, we consider methods by which a more speculative approach to psychoanalytic theory and clinical practice might offer a deeper understanding of Asian American mental health issues.}, language = {en} } @article{EriksonBloland, author = {Erikson-Bloland, Sue}, title = {Reply to Barnaby Barratt}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 10 (2000), pp. 285-289.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 10 (2000), pp. 285-289.}, language = {en} } @article{Ermann, author = {Ermann, Michael}, title = {Psychoanalytic Theory in a Creative Process between Culture and Analyst. Paper presented at the IFPS XI International Forum in New York, May 4-7, 2000. Typescript 7 p.}, number = {unpublished version / unver{\"o}ffentlichte Fassung}, language = {en} }