@misc{Žitna, author = {Žitn{\´a}, Barbora}, title = {Koncepce humanistick{\´e} etiky v d{\´i}le E. Fromma, [The Concept of Humanistic Ethics in the Work of E. Fromm], Bachelor thesis, Philosophy, University of West Bohemia in Pilsen, Poland 2022, 41 pp.}, abstract = {Ziel dieser Arbeit ist es, die Grundprinzipien der humanistischen Ethik von Erich Fromm darzustellen. Seine Ideen werden mit denen von Sigmund Freud und Karl Marx verkn{\"u}pft, von denen Fromm oft inspiriert wurde. Im ersten Teil wird auf die Definition der humanistischen Ethik und die Unterscheidung zwischen biophiler und nekrophiler Orientierung eingegangen. Der Kern von Fromms Ethik ist seine Charakterologie. Dabei besch{\"a}ftigt sich die Arbeit mit produktiver und unproduktiver Orientierung, deren Auspr{\"a}gungen und in der Folge auch Seinsweisen. Der Hauptteil beschreibt die Frage nach der menschlichen Natur, zusammen mit der Frage, ob der Mensch von Natur aus schlecht oder gut ist. Auch dem Freiheitsbegriff Fromms wird Beachtung geschenkt. Diese Interpretation beschreibt den Prozess der Individualisierung, der zur Freiheit f{\"u}hrt, sowie die Mechanismen der Flucht, die sich aus diesem Prozess ergeben. Ein weiteres Thema ist ein {\"U}berblick {\"u}ber positive Freiheit und wie man sie erreicht. Im Zusammenhang mit der Freiheit befasst sich das Werk auch mit dem Gewissen. Der letzte Teil widmet sich einem Vergleich ausgew{\"a}hlter ethischer Kategorien von Karl Marx und Erich Fromm. Konkret geht es um eine Gegen{\"u}berstellung ihres Menschenbildes und seiner Entfremdung. [Deutsche Kurzfassung der Autorin]}, language = {pl} } @article{Żylicz, author = {Żylicz, Piotr Olaf}, title = {Problematyka moralna w psychologii humanistycznej [Moral Issues in Humanistic Psychology]}, series = {Roczniki Filozoficzne, Vol. 43, No. 4 (1995), pp. 75-89.}, journal = {Roczniki Filozoficzne, Vol. 43, No. 4 (1995), pp. 75-89.}, abstract = {The article discusses some moral aspects of the conceptions of A. Maslow, C. Rogers, S. Jourard, R. May, and other representatives of humanistic psychology. The relations between human nature and >good< and >evil<, autonomy of mature morality, personal freedom and responsibility, conscience and guilt, moral determinants of interpersonal relations are the major problems under analysis. The author also presents some basic objections made against the moral formulations stated in humanistic psychology.}, language = {pl} } @article{Šķesteris, author = {Šķesteris, Jānis}, title = {Brīvības variācijas (Erichs Fromms, Merabs Mamardašvili). Paper presented at Fromma konference „Brīvība un brīvības: iespējas un draudi" Norises laiks 10. un 11. maijs 2013, 5 pp.}, language = {mul} } @article{Šķesteris, author = {Šķesteris, Jānis}, title = {Variationen von Freiheit (Erich Fromm, Merab Mamardaschwili)}, series = {Fromm Forum (Deutsche Ausgabe - ISSN 1437-0956), 18 / 2014, Tuebingen (Selbstverlag), pp. 53-56.}, volume = {d18/2014m}, journal = {Fromm Forum (Deutsche Ausgabe - ISSN 1437-0956), 18 / 2014, Tuebingen (Selbstverlag), pp. 53-56.}, language = {de} } @book{Šuvajevs, author = {Šuvajevs, Igors}, title = {Krievijas homo imperii (ģenealoģiskas piezīmes), Filosofijas lekciju sēriju izdod LU Filozofijas un socioloģijas institūts, Riga (Latvian University) 2015, 94 pp.}, language = {mul} } @article{Šuvajevs, author = {Šuvajevs, Igors}, title = {Lettland und die Flucht vor der Freiheit}, series = {Fromm Forum (Deutsche Ausgabe - ISSN 1437-0956), 18 / 2014, Tuebingen (Selbstverlag), pp. 11-16.}, volume = {d18/2014d}, journal = {Fromm Forum (Deutsche Ausgabe - ISSN 1437-0956), 18 / 2014, Tuebingen (Selbstverlag), pp. 11-16.}, language = {de} } @article{Šuvajevs, author = {Šuvajevs, Igors}, title = {Noslēgums jeb Fromma aktualitāte Latvijā}, series = {I. Suvajevs (Ed.), Begsana no brivibas? Erihs Fromms un Latjija, Riga (University of Latvia, Institute of Philosophy and Sociology) 2014, pp. 197-201.}, journal = {I. Suvajevs (Ed.), Begsana no brivibas? Erihs Fromms un Latjija, Riga (University of Latvia, Institute of Philosophy and Sociology) 2014, pp. 197-201.}, language = {mul} } @article{Šuvajevs, author = {Šuvajevs, Igors}, title = {Fromms, Funks un dzīvesmāksla}, series = {R. Funk, Ēriha Fromma aktualitāte. Filosofijas lekcijas Riga, Riga (University of Latvia, Institute of Philosophy and Sociology) 2014, pp. 53-62.}, journal = {R. Funk, Ēriha Fromma aktualitāte. Filosofijas lekcijas Riga, Riga (University of Latvia, Institute of Philosophy and Sociology) 2014, pp. 53-62.}, language = {mul} } @article{Šuvajevs, author = {Šuvajevs, Igors}, title = {Erich Fromm and Latvia. Summary}, series = {Fromm Forum (English Edition - ISSN 1437-1189), 19 / 2015, Tuebingen (Selbstverlag), pp. 60-61.}, volume = {e18/2015h}, journal = {Fromm Forum (English Edition - ISSN 1437-1189), 19 / 2015, Tuebingen (Selbstverlag), pp. 60-61.}, language = {en} } @article{Šuvajevs, author = {Šuvajevs, Igors}, title = {Ievads jeb Fromms un Latvija}, series = {I. Suvajevs (Ed.), Begsana no brivibas? Erihs Fromms un Latjija, Riga (University of Latvia, Institute of Philosophy and Sociology) 2014, pp. ix-xii.}, journal = {I. Suvajevs (Ed.), Begsana no brivibas? Erihs Fromms un Latjija, Riga (University of Latvia, Institute of Philosophy and Sociology) 2014, pp. ix-xii.}, language = {mul} } @article{Šuvajevs, author = {Šuvajevs, Igors}, title = {Ērihs Fromms: brīvība un dzīvesmāksla}, series = {I. Suvajevs (Ed.), Begsana no brivibas? Erihs Fromms un Latjija, Riga (University of Latvia, Institute of Philosophy and Sociology) 2014, pp. 63-78.}, journal = {I. Suvajevs (Ed.), Begsana no brivibas? Erihs Fromms un Latjija, Riga (University of Latvia, Institute of Philosophy and Sociology) 2014, pp. 63-78.}, language = {mul} } @article{Šumiga, author = {Šumiga, Dražen}, title = {Fromm's understanding of the Buddhist philosophical theory and psychoanalysis: From the phenomenal ego to the authentic being}, series = {International Forum of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 29 (No. 1, 2020), pp. 050-061.}, journal = {International Forum of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 29 (No. 1, 2020), pp. 050-061.}, abstract = {Erich Fromm was one of the first psychoanalytic thinkers who was genuinely interested in Asian philosophies. In the first part of this article, I will show Fromm's imago of Buddhism as a radical, nontheistic, and ethical philosophy >without God.< I will argue that Fromm made an important difference between the phenomenal ego and being that proves crucial for his understanding of psychoanalysis and his critique of modern society. I will also explore Fromm's synthesis of Buddhist philosophy and psychoanalysis, and show the similarities and differences between them.}, language = {en} } @article{Šumiga, author = {Šumiga, Dražen}, title = {Fromm's psychoanalytic theory and his understanding of the psychotherapeutic practice: existential, relational and social dimension of the psychotherapeutic work. Typescript 2019, 34 pp.}, abstract = {In this article we will explore three important themes: (1) Fromm's anti-objectivistic perspective which stands for the idea that the other Being should not become an object in analysis; (2) the central idea of the relatedness and the relational dimension in the psychotherapeutic practice; (3) in the last part we will analyze the existential-ontological level which is manifested in analysis. We will focus our attention on the different ways in which Fromm as a psychoanalytic thinker, social critic and humanist can help the therapists to include the existential and social dimension in the psychotherapeutic work.}, language = {en} } @misc{Štědronsky, author = {Štědronsk{\´y}, Josef}, title = {Teorie psychologie osobnosti (starš{\´i} a novějš{\´i}) [Theories of Personality Psychology (Older and Newer)], Bachelor thesis, Psychology, University of West Bohemia in Pilsen, Poland 2012, 71 pp.}, abstract = {The bachelor´s thesis describes the philosophy of three important philosophers Erich Fromm, Victor Emanuel Frankl and Albert Camus. The work is divided into four chapters, in each of them I always deal with one specific problem from the point of view of all these philosophers. At the end of each chapter there is some conclusion and a summary of these thoughts as well as findings of similar characters of their philosophy. The first chapter is devoted to the problem of authentic way of the human existence. There are presented the basic features of Frankl´s, Fromm´s and Camus´ philosophy. The second chapter deals with the topic of freedom, primarily, whether the absolute freedom possible is or is not. The following chapter talks about the issue of human society and its impact on a human. The last chapter describes the problem of death and suicide. Whether these authors accept death as the end of the human life or whether they accept suicide as the solution of the human life. In conclusion, I tried to summarize the similar points of philosophy of these authors.}, language = {pl} } @misc{Štadlerova, author = {Št{\´a}dlerov{\´a}, Pavl{\´i}na}, title = {Srovn{\´a}n{\´i} n{\´a}zoru na lidskou existenci: existencialist{\´e}, Fromm a Frankl [Comparison of Opinions on Human Being: Existentialists, Fromm and Frankl], Bachelor thesis, Philosophy, University of West Bohemia in Pilsen, Poland 2013, 32 pp.}, abstract = {Bakal{\´a}řsk{\´a} pr{\´a}ce se zab{\´y}v{\´a} filozofi{\´i} tř{\´i} v{\´y}znamn{\´y}ch filozofů Ericha Fromma, Viktora Emanuela Frankla a Alberta Camuse. Pr{\´a}ce je rozdělena do čtyř kapitol, ve kter{\´y}ch se vždy zab{\´y}v{\´a}m jedn{\´i}m probl{\´e}mem z pohledu všech zm{\´i}něn{\´y}ch autorů. V z{\´a}věru kapitoly je určit{\´e} shrnut{\´i} těchto myšlenek a nalezen{\´i} podobn{\´y}ch znaků jejich filozofie. Prvn{\´i} kapitola je věnov{\´a}na probl{\´e}mu autentick{\´e}ho způsobu lidsk{\´e} existence. Ve druh{\´e} kapitole se zab{\´y}v{\´a}m t{\´e}matem svobody, a to předevš{\´i}m, zda je či nen{\´i} absolutn{\´i} svoboda možn{\´a}. N{\´a}sleduj{\´i}c{\´i} kapitola řeš{\´i} ot{\´a}zku lidsk{\´e} společnosti a jej{\´i}ho vlivu na člověka. Posledn{\´i} kapitola představuje probl{\´e}m smrti a sebevraždy. V z{\´a}věru pr{\´a}ce jsem se pokusila o shrnut{\´i} společn{\´y}ch bodů filozofie již zm{\´i}něn{\´y}ch filozofů.}, language = {pl} } @article{Štrukelj, author = {Štrukelj, M.}, title = {Spremna beseda}, series = {E. Fromm, Umetnost ljubezbi in življenja, Ljubljana (Mladisnka knjiga) 2010, pp. 384-389.}, journal = {E. Fromm, Umetnost ljubezbi in življenja, Ljubljana (Mladisnka knjiga) 2010, pp. 384-389.}, language = {mul} } @article{Šoškić, author = {Šoškić, Radoje V.}, title = {>I is another<: Humanistic conception of identity and existential options in James Joyce's A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man}, series = {Zbornik radova Filozofskog fakulteta u Prištini, No. 40, pp. 139-154.}, journal = {Zbornik radova Filozofskog fakulteta u Prištini, No. 40, pp. 139-154.}, abstract = {James Joyce represents one of the most significant novelists of the twentieth century and an adherent of the great tradition of humanistic ethics. The purpose of this paper is to critically examine, primarily in the light of humanistic ethics, the process of the artistic coming of age of the main character of Portrait, Stephen Dedalus. The basic principles of Humanism tend to view man in his physical and spiritual totality, believing that man's fundamental aim is to >be man< and that the major prerequisite for achieving that aim is to be >man for himself<. Stephen Dedalus epitomizes Fromm's type of man of productive character, in the sense that he gradually frees himself from the >nets< of Irish society represented in the form of constraints of nationality, family, and religion which he sees as threatening forces bent upon annihilating his own individuality. Stephen Dedalus manages to accomplish true affirmation of his individuality only through artistic vocation. Moreover, it could be argued that Stephen D. (Joyce himself) stands for the epitome of a genuine intellectual living in self-imposed exile and who is, according to the words of philosopher Julien Benda, a guardian and a bearer of independent thought who is loyal solely to truth.}, language = {en} } @article{Šebek, author = {Šebek, M.}, title = {The fate of the totalitarian object}, series = {International Forum of Psychoanalysis, Oslo (Scandinavian University Press), Vol. 5 (No. 4, December 1996), pp. 289-294.}, journal = {International Forum of Psychoanalysis, Oslo (Scandinavian University Press), Vol. 5 (No. 4, December 1996), pp. 289-294.}, language = {en} } @article{Šauers, author = {Šauers, Edijs}, title = {Brīvība kā nosacījums mīlestībai vai mīlestība kā nosacījums brīvībai (Imanuel Kants, Erich Fromms). Paper presented at Fromma konference „Brīvība un brīvības: iespējas un draudi" Norises laiks 10. un 11. maijs 2013, 4 pp.}, language = {mul} } @article{Šauers, author = {Šauers, Edijs}, title = {Freiheit als unbedingte Voraussetzung f{\"u}r Liebe oder Liebe als Voraussetzung f{\"u}r die Freiheit (Immanuel Kant, Erich Fromm)}, series = {Fromm Forum (Deutsche Ausgabe - ISSN 1437-0956), 18 / 2014, Tuebingen (Selbstverlag), pp. 51-53.}, volume = {d18/2014l}, journal = {Fromm Forum (Deutsche Ausgabe - ISSN 1437-0956), 18 / 2014, Tuebingen (Selbstverlag), pp. 51-53.}, language = {de} }