@book{Groddeck, author = {Groddeck, Georg}, title = {Ketzereien. Schriften zum Arzten und zur Medizin 1889-1908, ed. by Michael Giefer and Beate Schuh (= Groddeck Werke, im Auftrag der Georg Groddeck-Gesellschaft), Frankfurt am Main (Stroemfeld / Roter Stern) 2014.}, language = {de} } @book{Groddeck, author = {Groddeck, Georg}, title = {Nasamecu. Der gesunde und kranke Mensch gemeinverst{\"a}ndlich dargestellt, ed. by Michael Giefer and Beate Schuh (= Groddeck Werke, im Auftrag der Georg Groddeck-Gesellschaft), Frankfurt am Main (Stroemfeld / Roter Stern) 2014.}, language = {de} } @article{Gunderson, author = {Gunderson, Ryan}, title = {The First-generation Frankfurt School on the Animal Question. Foundations for a Normative Sociological Animal Studies}, series = {Sociological Perspectives, Vol. 57 (No. 3, September 2014), pp. 285-300.}, journal = {Sociological Perspectives, Vol. 57 (No. 3, September 2014), pp. 285-300.}, abstract = {Well before the now flourishing field of animal studies, the thinkers associated with Frankfurt, Germany's Institute of Social Research theorized and problematized society's troubling relationship with animals. Early critical theory explored the various manifestations of >unrelenting exploitation< animals have experienced in human societies and maintained that the domination of animals is intimately linked to the domination of human beings, especially of women and racial and ethnic minorities. They criticized Western thought for instrumentalist attitudes toward animals and were committed to extending compassion to animals. Max Horkheimer, Theodor W. Adorno, and Herbert Marcuse mount four challenges to sociologists today: (1) to unmask the shared forms of domination experienced by both animals and marginalized human beings, (2) for environmental sociologists to make animals a principle subject of investigation, (3) for sociological animal studies scholars to engage with philosophy, and (4) to adopt a critical and normative sociological perspective when studying human-animal relations.}, language = {en} } @article{Gunderson, author = {Gunderson, Ryan}, title = {Social barriers to biophilia: Merging structural and ideational explanations for environmental degradation}, series = {The Social Science Journal, Vol. 51, No. 4 (2014), pp. 681-685. [Online ISSN: 1873-5355] [doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2014.06.002]}, journal = {The Social Science Journal, Vol. 51, No. 4 (2014), pp. 681-685. [Online ISSN: 1873-5355] [doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2014.06.002]}, abstract = {Erich Fromm argues that the only reliable way to solve the environmental crisis is to alter current social formations in a way in which biophilia can flourish, so humankind can solve its existential dichotomy as well as meet survival needs in an ecologically sound way. However, society's preoccupation with the non-alive-elements such as technique, the mechanical, gadgets, and commodities - shows that the modern social character is far from biophilous. Instead, modern societies are inherently ecologically destructive due to systematic processes and attraction to its progress is a less acute form of, what Fromm terms, necrophilia. His insights can help formulate a social theory of environmental degradation that includes structural and ideational variables. Prescriptively, this means appeals for value changes must correspond with fitting appeals for structural changes in social systems.}, language = {en} } @article{Guo, author = {Guo, Kejing}, title = {Social Media Users' Self-positioning Research [社会化媒体用户的>自我定位<研究]}, abstract = {社会化媒体是被世界各国都极为重视的新媒体形态。美国总统奥巴马在大选的过程中对社会化媒体的运用,证明了社会化媒体已成功改变人类关注世界的习惯。本文从社会化媒体用户互动行为中的>关注模式<和>对话模式<入手,并结合精神分析心理学家艾里希•弗洛姆提出的定位坐标系需求,对以微博为代表的六类用户深入研究,分析用户如何利用社会化媒体进行>自我定位<。}, language = {zh} } @misc{Harris, author = {Harris, Adrienne}, title = {Review Friedman, L. J.: The Lives of Erich Fromm: Love's Prophet}, series = {Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, Vol. 62 (No. 3, 2014), pp. 503-519. [doi: 10.1177/0003065114536613]}, journal = {Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, Vol. 62 (No. 3, 2014), pp. 503-519. [doi: 10.1177/0003065114536613]}, language = {en} } @misc{He, author = {He, Linan}, title = {Road to Freedom - Understanding of >Saturday Night and Sunday Morning< with Fromm's Freedom Concept [自由之路 - 弗洛姆自由观下的《星期六的晚上和星期天的早上》之解读], Master thesis, English Language and Literature Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot, Autonomous Inner Mongolia Region, China 2014. [application of Fromm's theories to art]}, abstract = {本文将以阿兰•西利托小说《星期六的晚上和星期天的早晨》为例,对20世纪英国50年代的工人阶级青年人在追求自由的过程中遭遇的困境做出系统的分析,并试图找到他们追求积极自由的可行性道路。本文以埃利•希弗洛姆关于人性的精神分析理论以及主人公亚瑟的精神转变为参照,试图对亚瑟—《星期六的晚上和星期日的早上》的主人公,同时也是愤怒的青年的代表人物所追寻的自由进行分析。首先试图对主人公亚瑟在追求激进自由,也就是消极自由时所表现出来的叛逆行为和散漫的生活以及由其追求的消极自由所带来的异化进行分析,进而揭示其偏激自由观的本质。在这一阶段,本论文试图从亚瑟对社会制度和传统道德的反叛行为入手进而得出亚瑟对过激自由的执着追求是受到了社会压力,工人阶级的生活压力以及本人的不健全性格等多重合力的影响而造成的结果。从以上的论述和分析中我们可以得出结论,亚瑟所奉行的偏激自由思想正如弗洛姆在其理论中描绘的所谓>消极自由<,这种自由在表面上似乎带给了他无尽享受与轻松,但实质上带给他更多的空虚与孤独。因此,任何只求轻松而逃避责任并力图疏离于人际纽带之外的偏激自由都是消极自由。与消极自由不同的是,积极自由可以带给人们一种真正的自我和归属感。因而只有通过回归真实的生活,勇于担当,构筑起人与人之间的和谐纽带,现代人才有可能踏上通往追求真正的自由之路}, language = {zh} } @article{Heinzmann, author = {Heinzmann, Gerhard}, title = {Cavailles in Heidelberg: der Beginn einer schwierigen Liaison}, series = {Markus Bitterolf, Oliver Schlaudt und Stefan Sch{\"o}bel (Eds.): Intellektuelle in Heidelberg 1910-1933. Ein Lesebuch, Heidelberg (Edition Sch{\"o}bel), 2014, pp. 79-82.}, journal = {Markus Bitterolf, Oliver Schlaudt und Stefan Sch{\"o}bel (Eds.): Intellektuelle in Heidelberg 1910-1933. Ein Lesebuch, Heidelberg (Edition Sch{\"o}bel), 2014, pp. 79-82.}, language = {de} } @article{Herrmann, author = {Herrmann, Klaus}, title = {Gershom Scholems Weg zur Kabbala}, series = {G. Necker, E. Morlok, M. Morgenstern, 2014: Gershom Sholem in Deutschland. Zwischen Seelenverwandtschaft und Sprachlosigkeit, T{\"u}bingen (Mohr Siebeck) 2014, pp. 037-071.}, journal = {G. Necker, E. Morlok, M. Morgenstern, 2014: Gershom Sholem in Deutschland. Zwischen Seelenverwandtschaft und Sprachlosigkeit, T{\"u}bingen (Mohr Siebeck) 2014, pp. 037-071.}, language = {de} } @article{Hoeges, author = {Hoeges, Dirk}, title = {W{\"a}chter in dunkler Nacht. Karl Mannheim und die Wissenssoziologie in Heidelberg}, series = {Markus Bitterolf, Oliver Schlaudt und Stefan Sch{\"o}bel (Eds.): Intellektuelle in Heidelberg 1910-1933. Ein Lesebuch, Heidelberg (Edition Sch{\"o}bel), 2014, pp. 233-248.}, journal = {Markus Bitterolf, Oliver Schlaudt und Stefan Sch{\"o}bel (Eds.): Intellektuelle in Heidelberg 1910-1933. Ein Lesebuch, Heidelberg (Edition Sch{\"o}bel), 2014, pp. 233-248.}, language = {de} } @article{Huang, author = {Huang, Siwen}, title = {Castle in the >Flowers of Evi< - Interpretation of >The Fall of the House of Usher< in Psychoanalytic Perspective [古堡中的>恶之花<——以精神分析视角解读《厄谢府的倒塌》][application of Fromm's theories to art]}, series = {Intelligence [才智], No. 8 (2014), p. 282.}, journal = {Intelligence [才智], No. 8 (2014), p. 282.}, abstract = {《厄谢府的倒塌》讲述了主人公罗德里克活埋妹妹最终被破棺而出的妹妹惊吓而死的离奇故事,罗德里克自我异化、乱伦心理和恋尸癖极具精神分析研究价值。本文借用拉康的>镜像阶段>理论、弗洛伊德的精神分析美学、弗洛姆对恋尸癖的界说等理论、,描摹出爱伦•坡笔下的罗德里克经历的由自恋到恋物最终畸变为恋尸的心理演变过程。}, language = {zh} } @article{Jansen, author = {Jansen, Christian}, title = {Emil Julius Gumbel - ein kluger Professor und renitenter Pazifist, der im Winter 1930/31 Studentenkrawalle ausl{\"o}ste}, series = {Markus Bitterolf, Oliver Schlaudt und Stefan Sch{\"o}bel (Eds.): Intellektuelle in Heidelberg 1910-1933. Ein Lesebuch, Heidelberg (Edition Sch{\"o}bel), 2014, pp. 129-140.}, journal = {Markus Bitterolf, Oliver Schlaudt und Stefan Sch{\"o}bel (Eds.): Intellektuelle in Heidelberg 1910-1933. Ein Lesebuch, Heidelberg (Edition Sch{\"o}bel), 2014, pp. 129-140.}, language = {de} } @article{Jansen, author = {Jansen, Peter-Erwin}, title = {Die Weltrevolution steht um die Ecke - Leo L{\"o}wenthal in Heidelberg}, series = {M- Bitterolf et al. (Eds.), Intellektuelle in Heidelberg 1910-1933. Ein Lesebuch, ed by Markus Bitterolf, Oliver Schlaudt und Stefan Sch{\"o}bel, Heidelberg (Verlag Stefan Sch{\"o}bel) 2014, pp. 189-202.}, journal = {M- Bitterolf et al. (Eds.), Intellektuelle in Heidelberg 1910-1933. Ein Lesebuch, ed by Markus Bitterolf, Oliver Schlaudt und Stefan Sch{\"o}bel, Heidelberg (Verlag Stefan Sch{\"o}bel) 2014, pp. 189-202.}, language = {de} } @misc{Jiang, author = {Jiang, Man}, title = {A Comparative Study of Consumer Alienation Theory Marcuse and Fromm [马尔库塞和弗洛姆消费异化理论比较研究], Philosophy, Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China 2014.[application of Fromm's theories to art]}, abstract = {消费是任何时代都存在的人类的一种基本活动,如今,消费已经成为人类赖以生存和发展的前提。我国正处于社会转型期,经济的快速增长和国民消费水平的不断提高,从消费观念到消费方式都发生了很大的变化,消费在满足人们所必须的物质需求的基础上还需要满足人们的精神需求,随之同时就出现了奢侈性消费和盲目性消费等消费异化现象。这些现象的存在不仅会带来一些社会问题,而且阻碍着人们消费质量的提高,还会严重制约经济的增长和整个社会的全面进步。因此,研究并解决消费异化现象问题就迫切地摆在人们面前。国内外许多学者从不同的角度对消费异化现象及其社会影响进行了深入研究,并提出了许多具有价值的观点,其中具有影响力的当推马尔库塞和弗洛姆的消费异化理论,考察唯物史观的创立发展过程,研究异化问题的产生和解决也是马克思考察社会发展问题的一种基本方法。本文立足于唯物史观的基本立场,比较分析了马尔库塞和弗洛姆消费异化理论的相同点和不同点,以及他们各自消费异化理论在社会发展中的影响作用,对我们寻找到解决消费异化问题的方法和途径、引导人们形成正确的消费观具有借鉴作用。通过对马尔库塞和弗洛姆消费异化理论的比较研究,可以看出马尔库塞的消费异化理论是建立在马克思的劳动异化理论的基础上,是对马克思人本主义理论的深刻延伸,是弗洛伊德主义的马克思主义;弗洛姆从社会制度入手,对消费异化的根源进行研究,他重视消费道德教育,提出根据各类人的消费心态和消费行为进行针对性的道德教育,对我们正确认识消费异化的根源,构建正确的消费观念具有重要的参考作用。本文认为在现代哲学的语境下,马尔库塞和弗洛姆的消费异化理论互相交融的可能性是很大的,通过对二者理论内涵和缺陷的分析研究,找出各自理论价值的合理性,从内容上相互补充和借鉴,试图创立符合现阶段我国国情的科学消费价值观,这对倡导人们树立正确的消费观、构建与社会经济发展相适应的消费模式、形成合理的消费行为、优化我国的消费结构具有重要的理论价值和现实意义。}, language = {zh} } @misc{Jiang, author = {Jiang, Nan}, title = {The Commentary of Western Marxist Consumption Alienation Theory [西方马克思主义的消费异化理论述评], Master thesis, Foreign Marxism, Southwest University of Political Science \& Law, Yubei, Chongqing, China 2014.}, abstract = {消费异化是西方马克思主义的重要理论,是关于消费在现代社会发生异化的现象、原因及解决途径的理论。它分析了现代社会发展的弊病,描述了现代社会的消费主义大环境。西方马克思主义的哲学家们,通过对社会的观察结合马克思主义的基本观点提出了消费异化理论,说明了消费异化产生的原因及危害,从现实的角度描绘消费社会的基本状况,批判消费异化对人性地扭曲。本文通过西方马克思主义哲学家关于消费异化理论地论述分析西方马克思主义的消费异化观。鲍德里亚提出人已不再被人所包围而是被物所包围,人与人之间被重新以物为符号划分人的等级,这是非常恐怖的,人们为了自己的地位不得不努力地劳动而失去自我以适应新的社会现实,各类媒体的介入使的消费异化更加严重。弗洛姆以心理学的角度分析人在消费中内心的变化,这种变化逐渐地波及到人与人之间的关系,也影响到人对自己地定位发展,这些都是非常不利的。马尔库塞提出了消费异化是工业社会发展的必然结果地论断,说明福利社会是以糖衣炮弹的形式使具有反抗精神的消费人群成为顺民,进而完成统治的欲望。这些观点虽然都存在局限性,但为资本主义社会的分析做出了有益地贡献。在人们的观念中不断地形成了一种以符号为代表的等级社会,在这种社会中,通过对人占有物的程度划分人的等级,这是对人性地忽视。本文阐明消费异化的基本理论,梳理对比不同学者的理论观点,结合现代社会发展的具体情况,分析原因并试图提出解决途径。消费异化地发展,为分析现代的社会问题提供了良好的研究方向,通过对消费异化的探究,可以反思现代社会的弊病,对解决生态危机理论提供了有价值研究内容。}, language = {zh} } @article{Kim, author = {Kim, Mee Jin}, title = {노인자살 원인으로서의 소외에 대한 분석과 소외 극복을 위한 기독교 상담 [Christian Consultation for the Analysis and Overcoming of Alienation, Cause of Suicide in the Elderlys]}, series = {한국기독교상담학회지 [Korean Journal of Christian Counseling (KJCC)], Vol. 25, No. 3 (2014), pp. 9-46.}, journal = {한국기독교상담학회지 [Korean Journal of Christian Counseling (KJCC)], Vol. 25, No. 3 (2014), pp. 9-46.}, abstract = {본 연구는 노년기 자살에서 자살의 원인이 되는 소외에 관한 연구이다. 소외가 노인자살의 주요한 원인이 되는 것에 착안하여 노인자살의 원인으로서의 소외에 관한 연구를 시도하게 되었다. 아울러 소외에 관하여는 Irvin Yalom의 실존주의 심리학적 관점과 Erich Fromm의 사회심리학적 관점, Paul Tillich 실존신학적 관점에서 연구를 하였다. 그리고 이들의 소외 개념을 통합하여 노인자살 문제에 적용했으며 또한 양적 연구와 질적 연구를 통하여 임상적으로 입증하고자 시도하였다. 연구의 결과로 드러난 노인자살의 원인으로 소외현상은 네 가지로 나타났는데, 자기소외, 대인관계의 소외, 사회심리적 소외, 신과의 소외로 나타났다. 이러한 문제의 소외 극복을 위한 상담 방법적 결론은 상담자와의 참 만남을 통하여 소외에 직면할 힘을 가지게 됨의 중요성과, 죽음을 피하는 것이 아니라 오히려 죽음에 직면함으로 죽음 불안을 극복하는 방법임을 알 수 있었다. 노인자살의 원인으로 소외를 극복하기 위해 기독교 상담학적인 고찰을 통하여 얻어진 결론은 소외 극복을 위한 새로운 존재의 가능성을 제시하였고 노년기 자살의 수동적인 유형으로 죽음에 대해 소망하는 것을 궁극적 관심에 대한 소망으로의 전환과 전인적인 기독교 상담을 통한 소외 극복 방안의 필요성을 알 수 있었다.}, language = {ko} } @article{Kimura, author = {Kimura, Dale}, title = {Self-Realization according to Erich Fromm and John Dewey, Essay, Education, University of Hawaii at Mānoa, Mānoa 2014, 55 pp.}, abstract = {While alienation is an ancient human phenomenon, largely because of the social-economic structure of American society, its pervasiveness and extensiveness today is unrivaled in all of history. This, at least was the view of a popular social critic and psychoanalyst, Erich Fromm. In his analysis this market-oriented society had produced almost totally alienated men. Alienation characterized their relationship to their work, to the things they consumed, to the State, to their fellow men and even to themselves. 2 Everyone and everything was thus treated as commodities whose values depended on their exchange values on the personality and commodity market. 3 Therefore, being in demand was held to be the supreme value by alienated man, and as a result he was another-directed man, a conformist, a slave to irrational authority. It was as his most comprehensive solution to this moral and social predicament that Fromm made the concept of man's realization of his intellectual, emotional, and sensuous potentialities the foundations in his theory of the good. [Taken from University's Website: http://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/handle/10125/31579]}, language = {en} } @article{Knowles, author = {Knowles, Elizabeth}, title = {Erich Fromm (1900-80)}, series = {Oxford Dictionary of Quotations, Oxford (Oxford University Press), 8th Edition 2014.}, journal = {Oxford Dictionary of Quotations, Oxford (Oxford University Press), 8th Edition 2014.}, language = {en} } @article{Koch, author = {Koch, Patrick B.}, title = {Ein verschollener j{\"u}discher Mystiker? - Gershom Scholems Nachforschungen zu Ephraim Joseph Hirschfeld}, series = {G. Necker, E. Morlok, M. Morgenstern, 2014: Gershom Sholem in Deutschland. Zwischen Seelenverwandtschaft und Sprachlosigkeit, T{\"u}bingen (Mohr Siebeck) 2014, pp. 219-242.}, journal = {G. Necker, E. Morlok, M. Morgenstern, 2014: Gershom Sholem in Deutschland. Zwischen Seelenverwandtschaft und Sprachlosigkeit, T{\"u}bingen (Mohr Siebeck) 2014, pp. 219-242.}, language = {de} } @article{Kremer, author = {Kremer, Renate}, title = {Frieda Fromm-Reichmann (1889-1957). Ein koscheres Sanatorium in Heidelberg als >intellektuelles Experiment<}, series = {M- Bitterolf et al. (Eds.), Intellektuelle in Heidelberg 1910-1933. Ein Lesebuch, ed by Markus Bitterolf, Oliver Schlaudt und Stefan Sch{\"o}bel, Heidelberg (Verlag Stefan Sch{\"o}bel) 2014, pp. 119-128.}, journal = {M- Bitterolf et al. (Eds.), Intellektuelle in Heidelberg 1910-1933. Ein Lesebuch, ed by Markus Bitterolf, Oliver Schlaudt und Stefan Sch{\"o}bel, Heidelberg (Verlag Stefan Sch{\"o}bel) 2014, pp. 119-128.}, language = {de} }