@article{YiKim, author = {Yi, Hyun Oak and Kim, Man Eui}, title = {인간의 공격성과 스포츠 [Sport and Human Aggression]}, series = {학술지명 [The Korean Journal of Physical Education], Vol. 41, No. 4 (2002), pp. 43-52. [Online ISSN 2508-7029]}, journal = {학술지명 [The Korean Journal of Physical Education], Vol. 41, No. 4 (2002), pp. 43-52. [Online ISSN 2508-7029]}, abstract = {This study is to suggest the aggression, human`s instinct as the new essence of sport. Through the psychological approach it could be found that the aggression which is human instinct is deeply related with the origin of sport. In relation to the instinct of death Freud has proved that there exists the aggression in human mentality and it could be said that the aggression of sport is related with Thanatos, the instinct of death that Freud said. Fromm, a sociopsychologist expanded the concept of Freud`s aggression and divided the aggression in human mentality as the defensive and positive aggression and destructive and malignant aggression and he saw that sport is related with the malignant aggression. I think we have to discard the attitude just to try to adapt the methodical value of sport although the value of sport exists with human instinct. Sport is the only thing to express and purify the aggression and it is expected to play the important role to create the future culture.}, language = {ko} } @article{Wątrobski, author = {Wątr{\´o}bski, Adam}, title = {Kategoria >wolności od< i >wolności do< w interpretacji wolności religijnej: konfrontacja ujęć E. Fromma i I. Berlina z deklaracją >Dignitatis humanae< [The Category of >Freedom from< and >Freedom to< in the Interpretation of Religious Freedom: Confrontation of the Views of E. Fromm and I. Berlin with the Declaration >Dignitatis humanae<]}, series = {Ł{\´o}dzkie Studia Teologiczne, Vol. 11/12 (2002/2003), pp. 345-354.}, journal = {Ł{\´o}dzkie Studia Teologiczne, Vol. 11/12 (2002/2003), pp. 345-354.}, abstract = {Zauważyć należy, że mimo ogromnej r{\´o}żnicy między poglądami Fromma i Berlina a stanowiskiem Kościoła pojęcia wolności pozytywnej i wolności negatyw-nej spełniają funkcję pomocną w analizie fenomenu wolności religijnej. Oczywiście nie są to narzędzia umożliwiające ukazanie istoty wolności religijnej, ale mogą się przyczynić do unaocznienia takich rzadziej stanowiących przedmiot refleksji filozof{\´o}w warunk{\´o}w koniecznych przyznawania się do religii, jak np. wolność od społecznego nacisku na grupy religijne, wolność od nieuprawnionych ingerencji państwa w sprawy religijne, wolność do swobodnego przekazywania wiedzy religijnej, do publicznego wyrażania przekonań religijnych itp. Myśliciele liberalni, kt{\´o}rych refleksja była inspiracją do napisania tego szkicu, skupiali swoją uwagę na wolności negatywnej. W tak rozumianej wolności upatrywali szczeg{\´o}lną wartość. Wolność w rozumieniu przedstawianym w Dignitatis humanae, o ile można ją charakteryzować przy użyciu pojęć proponowanych przez Berlina czy Fromma, będzie zdecydowanie bliższe wolności w sensie pozytywnym, a jej urzeczywistnienie jednostka będzie osiągać przez dobrowolne poddanie się prowadzeniu przez rozpoznaną Prawdę.}, language = {pl} } @article{VallejoOrellana, author = {Vallejo Orellana, Reyes}, title = {Karen Horney, una pionera de la ruptura con el modelo freudiano para explicar la psicolog{\´i}a femenina y el desarrollo humano sano y neur{\´o}tico, Article, Educational Psychology, Department of Developmental and Educational Psychology, University of Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain 2002, 11 pp. [idus.us.es/handle/11441/14829]}, language = {es} } @article{Takizawa, author = {Takizawa, Shigeo}, title = {To Establish the New Civilization for the Solution of the Aging crisis}, series = {Biophilia [バイオフィリア], Vol. 1, No. 2 (2002), pp. 35-37. [doi.org/10.14813/ibra.1.2_35]}, journal = {Biophilia [バイオフィリア], Vol. 1, No. 2 (2002), pp. 35-37. [doi.org/10.14813/ibra.1.2_35]}, abstract = {An etymology of a biophilia is Latin and is also mentioned with the instinct of the preservation of race as defined in Japanese-English dictionaries, in American dictionaries it is defined as an appreciation for life. And also bio is life and philia is love in Greek. The preface of >The Revolution of Hope< as described by Erich Fromm who is an American philosopher is a reference for biophilia. He described >The love of life< which exists in most of us is a latent power that is mobilized and whose behavior can change and can bring about change when life is threatened by danger and is fully recognized.}, language = {en} } @article{Song, author = {Song, Jai-ryong}, title = {정신분석학적 종교이해의 가능성과 한계: 에리히 프롬을 중심으로 [The Possibilities and Limitations of Psychoanalytic Understanding of Religion: Focusing on Erich Fromm]}, series = {사회이론 [Korean Journal of Social Theory], Vol. 20 (2002).}, journal = {사회이론 [Korean Journal of Social Theory], Vol. 20 (2002).}, language = {ko} } @article{Pietikainen, author = {Pietikainen, Petteri}, title = {Utopianism in psychology: the case of Wilhelm Reich}, series = {Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 38, No. 2 (2002), pp. 157-75. [Online ISSN 1520-6696] [doi.org/10.1002/jhbs.10034]}, journal = {Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 38, No. 2 (2002), pp. 157-75. [Online ISSN 1520-6696] [doi.org/10.1002/jhbs.10034]}, abstract = {This article examines utopian elements in Wilhelm Reich's writings in his American phase (1939-1957) in order to illustrate utopian sources of dynamic psychology. Although there are scholars who have used the term >psychological utopia< and applied it to individual thinkers (Reich, Marcuse, Fromm) and to specific psychological disciplines (psychoanalysis, behaviorism, cognitive psychology), the term itself has remained elusive and vague. Furthermore, there have been few attempts to systematically examine utopian elements in twentieth-century psychology in general and the basic assumptions of psychological utopianism in particular. While pointing out that Reich's orgonomic theories have no scientific merit, this article argues for the relevancy of his ideas for understanding the nature of utopianism in dynamic psychology. (© 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)}, language = {en} } @article{Maddox, author = {Maddox, Chris G.}, title = {Individual Psychology and Logotherapy: Facing the Challenge of the 21st Century}, series = {Self \& Society, Vol. 30, No. 5 (2002), pp. 28-38. [Online ISSN 2374-5355] [doi.org/10.1080/03060497.2002.11086174]}, journal = {Self \& Society, Vol. 30, No. 5 (2002), pp. 28-38. [Online ISSN 2374-5355] [doi.org/10.1080/03060497.2002.11086174]}, abstract = {The evolution of dynamic psychology has been highly contradictory and uneven due in part to differences of emphasis and focus, and also due to philosophical and theoretical differences, which led to congruent and incongruent results between the respective schools. Now, especially with the new millennium, many are asking again whether in fact we should not go beyond the different schools towards a new sense of unity and purpose. Today there is a call for integration and a sense of common purpose, although how this is to be achieved is not clear. However, it has been argued that the introversion of a theory and the defence of its purity by its adherents will act as a brake on its growth and further development (John, 1998; Millar, 2000). The basis of any theory is always incomplete (Fromm, 1980) and consequently scientific progress must come as a result of open dialogue and debate for the benefit of all schools of psychology and psychotherapy. Classically, Adlerian psychology was founded upon a flexible and open-ended approach to the understanding of human nature. Orgler, for example, notes that Adler avoided offering a >rigid scheme< that could easily be copied by physicians and therapists (Orgler, 1973, p.167). And, regarding training, Orgler writes that >Adler demanded a thorough knowledge of other psychological schools, of philosophy and of pedagogy< (ibid, p.176).}, language = {en} } @article{LindBos, author = {Lind, E. Allan and Bos, Kees van den}, title = {When fairness works: Toward a general theory of uncertainty management}, series = {Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 24 (2002), pp. 181-224. [Online ISSN: 2468-1741] [doi.org/10.1016/s0191-3085(02)24006-x]}, journal = {Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 24 (2002), pp. 181-224. [Online ISSN: 2468-1741] [doi.org/10.1016/s0191-3085(02)24006-x]}, abstract = {The only way in our opinion to account for this striving for justice and truth is by the analysis of the whole history of man, socially and individually. We find then that for everybody who is powerless, justice and truth are the most important weapons in the fight for his freedom and growth (Fromm, 1942/2002, p. 248).}, language = {en} } @misc{Li, author = {Li, Xiaomei}, title = {An Analysis of the Humanistic Value of Technology - Also on Marx's Philosophy of Technology [技术的人本价值探析 ——兼论马克思的技术哲学思想], Master thesis, Scientific Research Management, Heilongjiang University, Heilongjiang, Harbin, China 2002.}, abstract = {The subject of this work is the state of human nature as a result of the impact of technology. Technology is significant for human nature, human freedom and human liberation. Based on an examination of the state of man's nature as a result of the impact of technology, this paper argues that in the process of technology development, on the one hand, reason and wisdom develop man's nature, and on the other hand, this nature is hindered, even destroyed; technology and man's nature are restricted from within. Technology development is not the final goal, but human development is the goal of technology development. In this work, we have dealt with modern technology philosophy and technology-critical ideas in the Western countries and technology alienation according to Marx on the level of human nature, taking human nature as the basis. [Translation: www.cnki.net, 6/2023]}, language = {zh} } @article{Gold, author = {Gold, Jerry}, title = {The Failed Social Legacy of Interpersonal Psychoanalysis}, series = {Race, Gender \& Class in Psychology, Vol. 9, No. 4 (2002), pp. 147-157 [Print ISSN 1082-8354] [jstor.org/stable/41675280]}, journal = {Race, Gender \& Class in Psychology, Vol. 9, No. 4 (2002), pp. 147-157 [Print ISSN 1082-8354] [jstor.org/stable/41675280]}, abstract = {Reviews the unique contributions of Harry Stack Sullivan and Erich Fromm in synthesizing a psychoanalytic outlook with concern for political, economic, and social issues. Discusses some of the reasons why succeeding generations of interpersonal psychoanalysts have lost touch with these issues. Concludes with suggestions about how contemporary psychoanalysis might expand its vision to include the study of race, gender, and class issues.}, language = {en} } @article{Funk, author = {Funk, Rainer}, title = {Authoritarianism and the Concept of Social Character According to Erich Fromm, Typescript for a publication 2002 in Poland that was not realized. [Partial translation of Funk_R_1995f, translated by Hans Seidenst{\"u}cker]}, language = {en} } @article{Araki, author = {Araki, Yoshinobu}, title = {ニュー・テロリズムの政治心理: オウム真理教とアルカイダ荒木[Political Psychology of A New Terrorism: The Aum Shinrikyo Sect and Usama bin Laden's al-Qaida]}, series = {法政論叢 [The Japanese Journal of Law and Political Science], Vol. 39, No. 1 (2002), pp. 81-93. [doi.org/10.20816/jalps.39.1_81]}, journal = {法政論叢 [The Japanese Journal of Law and Political Science], Vol. 39, No. 1 (2002), pp. 81-93. [doi.org/10.20816/jalps.39.1_81]}, abstract = {September 9/11 shocked the Japanese. It also reminded me of the 1995 sarin gas attack on the Tokyo subways by the Aum Shinrikyo and the Oklahoma City Bombing by the American extreme right. A novel form of terrorism seems to have aroused since 1995. Therefore I have tried to analyze some similarity and difference between the Aum Shinrikyo Sect and Usama bin Laden's al-Quaida for several months in order to clarify the content of a >new terrorism<. Although at first assumed that the two incidents were heterogeneous, the more I have analyzed them, the more I have founded out that were homogeneous. This paper tries to examine the similarity between the two groups and point out that their common motivation is a kind of self-actualization developed by A. H. Maslow. The survey includes anomie scale and authoritarian scale. This analysis reveals that economic factor and anomie factor influence over the self-actualization of current Japanese students who must overcome their anxiety aroused by the serious economic crisis as well as their identity crisis developed by Erick H. Erikson. It also points out that such a self-actualization and authoritarian personality developed by Erich Fromm influence over their inclination to religion. As a result it implies that such a perspective could explain also the behaviors of the Aum Shinrikyo Sect and Usama bin Laden' al-Qaida: The two terrorist groups that are mainly consisted of young males escape from freedom committing to religion, namely Aum Shinrikyo or >fundamentalist< Islam to remove anxiety aroused by the serious economic crisis.}, language = {ja} } @article{Anderson, author = {Anderson, Kevin B}, title = {Richard Quinney's Journey: The Marxist Dimension}, series = {Crime \& Delinquency, Vol. 48, No. 2 (2002), pp. 232-242. [Online ISSN 1552-387X] [doi.org/10.1177/0011128702048002003]}, journal = {Crime \& Delinquency, Vol. 48, No. 2 (2002), pp. 232-242. [Online ISSN 1552-387X] [doi.org/10.1177/0011128702048002003]}, abstract = {The relationship of Richard Quinney's critical criminology to Marxism is explored in this article. The originality of his version of critical criminology is discussed, from its origins in social constructionism, to his engagement with Marxism in the 1970s, to the importance in his later work of issues such as existentialism, Eastern thought, and Erich Fromm's socialist humanism. It is argued that Quinney's writings, despite several shifts of perspective, nonetheless exhibit some basic continuities and that an engagement with various forms of unorthodox, humanistic Marxism is one of these.}, language = {en} } @article{Yu, author = {Yu, Qiyan}, title = {An Analysis of the Theory of Obscenity in >A Dream of Red Mansions< [《红楼梦》之意淫论浅析] [application of Fromm's theories to art]}, series = {Journal of Hubei Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) [湖北师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版)], No. 1 (2002), pp. 115-118.}, journal = {Journal of Hubei Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) [湖北师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版)], No. 1 (2002), pp. 115-118.}, abstract = {曹雪芹在《红楼梦》中不仅在观念上 ,而且在叙述中 ,都对淫欲色情进行了明确区分 ,并提出了色淫、情淫、意淫这三个概念。意淫兼有弗洛姆所描述的胞爱、性爱、自爱等三种类型的爱的特征 ,但又与它们有着明显区别 ,因而不能被其中任何一类型的爱所取代。意淫具有浓厚的形而上学味 ,但又是贾宝玉的道德自律。贾宝玉对大观园的众女儿们之意淫 ,是只见体贴不见淫}, language = {zh} } @article{Roazen, author = {Roazen, Paul}, title = {Il coraggio di Erich Fromm}, series = {Psicoterapia e scienze umane, Vol. XXXII (No. 3, 1998), pp. 15-39. [See Roazen, 1996a]}, journal = {Psicoterapia e scienze umane, Vol. XXXII (No. 3, 1998), pp. 15-39. [See Roazen, 1996a]}, language = {it} } @article{DuBoisWright, author = {Du Bois, William and Wright, R. Dean}, title = {What Is Humanistic Sociology?}, series = {The American Sociologist, Winter 2002, pp. 5-36.}, journal = {The American Sociologist, Winter 2002, pp. 5-36.}, language = {en} } @article{Bierhoff, author = {Bierhoff, Burkhard}, title = {Fragen zum Frommschen Nekrophilie-Konzept. Ein Beitrag zu Rainer Funks Referat}, series = {M. Zimmer (Ed.), Der 11. September und die Folgen. Beitr{\"a}ge zum Diskurs nach den Terroranschl{\"a}gen und zur Entwicklung einer Kultur des Friedens, Tuebingen (Selbstverlag) 2002, pp. 137-140.}, journal = {M. Zimmer (Ed.), Der 11. September und die Folgen. Beitr{\"a}ge zum Diskurs nach den Terroranschl{\"a}gen und zur Entwicklung einer Kultur des Friedens, Tuebingen (Selbstverlag) 2002, pp. 137-140.}, language = {de} } @article{Angelova, author = {Angelova, K.}, title = {Erih From I biyagstvo ot svobodata dnes (Erich Fromm and the escape from freedom today)}, series = {Filosofiya (No. 2, 2002), pp. 58-61.}, journal = {Filosofiya (No. 2, 2002), pp. 58-61.}, language = {mul} } @article{Zeddies, author = {Zeddies, Timothy J.}, title = {Behind, Beneath. Above, and Beyond: The Historical Unconscious}, series = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 30 (2002), pp. 211-230.}, journal = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 30 (2002), pp. 211-230.}, language = {en} } @article{Zeddies, author = {Zeddies, Timothy J.}, title = {Historicity, Humility, and the Analytic Exercise Reply to Commentaries by Drs. Palombo and Horner}, series = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 30 (2002), pp. 235-240.}, journal = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 30 (2002), pp. 235-240.}, language = {en} } @article{Zeddies, author = {Zeddies, T. J.}, title = {Editorial: A Boycott by Passport.}, series = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 38 (2002), pp. 531-532.}, journal = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 38 (2002), pp. 531-532.}, language = {en} } @article{Zeddies, author = {Zeddies, T. J.}, title = {Keeping Your Eye on the Ball: Reply to Tublin.}, series = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 38 (2002), pp. 475-476.}, journal = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 38 (2002), pp. 475-476.}, language = {en} } @article{Zeddies, author = {Zeddies, T. J.}, title = {Sluggers and Analysts: Batting for Average with the Psychoanalytic Unconscious.}, series = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 38 (2002), pp. 423-444.}, journal = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 38 (2002), pp. 423-444.}, language = {en} } @misc{Wyse, author = {Wyse, L. Arnold}, title = {Review Robert F. Bornstein and Joseph M. Masling (Eds.): Empirical Studies of the Therapeutic Hour}, series = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 30 (2002), pp. 152-156.}, journal = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 30 (2002), pp. 152-156.}, language = {en} } @article{WittkinSasso, author = {Wittkin Sasso, G.}, title = {Book Review. Arthur H. Feiner, Interpersonal Psychoanalytic Perspectives on Relevance, Dismissal, and Self-Definition.}, series = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 38 (2002), pp.}, journal = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 38 (2002), pp.}, language = {en} } @article{Whitehead, author = {Whitehead, Clay C.}, title = {On the Asclepian Spirit and the Future of Psychoanalysis}, series = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 30 (2002), pp. 053-070.}, journal = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 30 (2002), pp. 053-070.}, language = {en} } @article{White, author = {White, K. P.}, title = {Surviving Hating and Being Hated: Some Personal Thoughts About Racism from a Psychoanalytic Perspective.}, series = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 38 (2002), pp. 401-422.}, journal = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 38 (2002), pp. 401-422.}, language = {en} } @article{Westen, author = {Westen, Drew}, title = {The bilingual self duet in two voices}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 12 (2002), pp. 915-920.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 12 (2002), pp. 915-920.}, abstract = {Two central questions raised by Spezzano's commentary have to do with the extent to which we seek objectivity in psychoanalytic theory and practice, and the extent to which one or another set of methods (e.g., clinical observation) is adequate or optimal for generating that knowledge. A discipline and treatment devoted to understanding subjectivity is nevertheless devoted to objective knowledge about a patient's subjectivity, defenses, and so forth and requires valid theories to guide exploration, inference, and intervention. Seeking objective knowledge does not require a na{\"i}ve empiricism ignorant of the limits of objectivity. We would do well to use multiple methods to learn about how the mind works and what leads to therapeutic change.}, language = {en} } @article{Westen, author = {Westen, Drew}, title = {The authority of logic and the logic of authority: The import of the gr{\"u}nbaum debate for psychoanalytically informed psychotherapy}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 12 (2002), pp. 857-898.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 12 (2002), pp. 857-898.}, abstract = {Much contemporary analytic writing is focused on the intersubjective >space< between analyst and analysand. This article focuses on a different area of analytic subjectivity and intersubjectivity - on the implicit rules that guide psychoanalytic thought and discourse, which have not received the kind of critical scrutiny as our explicit theories. The paper describes five problematic aspects of this implicit grammar and corresponding ways of refining it: articulating conceptual multiplicity where we often use unitary constructs (such as the unconscious or the therapeutic action of psychoanalysis) specifying mechanisms rather than causally ambiguous descriptions (such as two unconsciouses talking to one another) and conditional rather than blanket statements avoiding using terms in overdetermined ways that lead to theoretical imprecision and confusion of theory and metaphor exercising greater caution in the use of developmental constructs and analogies, particularly from infancy and rethinking the nature and presentation of evidence in psychoanalytic discourse.}, language = {en} } @article{Weisman, author = {Weisman, S. K.}, title = {James M. Herzog, Father Hunger: Explorations with Adults and Children.}, series = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 38 (2002), pp. 554-559.}, journal = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 38 (2002), pp. 554-559.}, language = {en} } @article{Warren, author = {Warren, C. Seth}, title = {Self psychology: Today}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 12 (2002), pp. 197-206.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 12 (2002), pp. 197-206.}, abstract = {In this commentary it is appreciated that in his approach Safran avoids some of the common pitfalls of brief therapy discourses, namely, the extremes of therapeutic grandiosity and therapeutic nihilism. Instead, seeking to maintain a >middle way,< he strives to balance the pragmatic and instrumental aims of time-limited psychotherapy with an appreciation of the existential and human dimensions of the therapeutic encounter. Safran also works to extend the full implications of relational theory to the theory and practice of brief psychotherapy. In this effect he relies on the contributions of constructivism, interpersonal psychoanalytic theory, and relational clinical theory. In this commentary some tensions and even contradictions are remarked upon between certain aspects of Safran's approach and the fundamental assumptions of relational theory. A tension is noted between the instrumental aims of brief therapy and Safran's goal of radical openness to patients. The importance of therapist decentering is acknowledged, along with paradoxes in the use of the concept of metacommunication. Finally, a question is raised as to the compatibility of empirically oriented approaches to psychotherapy research with the philosophical assumptions of a two-person psychology.}, language = {en} } @article{Wachtel, author = {Wachtel, Paul L.}, title = {Self-disclosure and the interactive matrix. Commentary on Kenneth A. Frank's paper}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 12 (2002), pp. 207-225.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 12 (2002), pp. 207-225.}, abstract = {In discussing the complexities and dialectical tensions inherent in the relational point of view, this commentary seeks to alert the reader to the simplifying dichotomies that can lead theory and clinical practice to be hostage to ideology. In exploring those dichotomies and their problematic implications for our work, emphasis is placed particularly on the nature of what constitutes evidence for our formulations and conclusions the different blind spots that different epistemological positions are designed to alert us to or, at least partially, to overcome the ways in which our efforts to transcend those blind spots often themselves create new blind spots the relation between insight and new relational experience the ambiguities associated with the (highly important but at times conceptually perilous) distinction between the one-person and the two-person models and the tensions between the need to hear patients in a fashion that is affirming and accepting and the equally important need to hear their fervent wish to change what they also want to have accepted. Many of these tensions and complexities are examined in the context of a critique of Bion's claim that analysts should be >without memory or desire.<}, language = {en} } @article{Villemoes, author = {Villemoes, Palle}, title = {Ego-Structuring Psychotherapy}, series = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 30 (2002), pp. 645-656.}, journal = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 30 (2002), pp. 645-656.}, language = {en} } @misc{Ullrich, author = {Ullrich, Helen E.}, title = {Review Marie-Christine Hamon: Why Do Women Love Men and Not Their Mothers?}, series = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 30 (2002), pp. 739-741.}, journal = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 30 (2002), pp. 739-741.}, language = {en} } @article{Turkel, author = {Turkel, Ann Ruth}, title = {From Victim to Heroine: Children's Stories Revisited}, series = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 30 (2002), pp. 071-082.}, journal = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 30 (2002), pp. 071-082.}, language = {en} } @article{Turco, author = {Turco, Ronald N.}, title = {Psychoanalysis in the Closet or a New Beginning?}, series = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 30 (2002), pp. 515-528.}, journal = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 30 (2002), pp. 515-528.}, language = {en} } @article{Turco, author = {Turco, Ronald N.}, title = {Primal Scene Derivatives in the Work of Yukio Mishima: The Primal Scene Fantasy}, series = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 30 (2002), pp. 241-248.}, journal = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 30 (2002), pp. 241-248.}, language = {en} } @article{Turco, author = {Turco, Ronald N.}, title = {The Object and the Dream: Mark Rothko}, series = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 30 (2002), pp. 017-034.}, journal = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 30 (2002), pp. 017-034.}, language = {en} } @article{Tublin, author = {Tublin, S.}, title = {But Always Behind in the Count: A Response to >Sluggers and Analysts<.}, series = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 38 (2002), pp. 445-464.}, journal = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 38 (2002), pp. 445-464.}, language = {en} } @misc{Tronick, author = {Tronick, Edward Z.}, title = {Review Philip Cushman: Constructing the Self, Constructing America: A Cultural History of Psychotherapy}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 12 (2002), pp. 073-099.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 12 (2002), pp. 073-099.}, abstract = {There has been little or no research on the establishment of infant moods or the mechanisms underlying them. One reason may be our difficulty in entertaining the idea that there are affective processes in infants that have long-lasting organizing continuous effects. It is this possibility that is considered in this paper. I attempt to address the questions of how moods are created and what some of their functions are. My model of moods is that infants have long-lasting (e.g., hours, days, and even longer) mood states. Mood states are dynamically changing yet distinct assemblages of affective behaviors. Mood control processes are modified by affective input from others. Thus moods are cocreated by the interplay of active, self-organized, biorhythmic affective control processes in the infant and the effect of the emotions expressed by others on mood control processes. In recognition of the importance of Sander's thinking to this work, I have named one of these processes the Sanderian Affective Wave. Mood states organize behavior and experience over time. Critically, moods serve an anticipatory representational function by providing directionality to an infant's behavior as he >moves< into the future. Thus they provide continuity to infants' experiential life. Furthermore, moods fulfill the Janus principle of bringing the past into the future for the infant, but as a noncognitive/symbolic/linguistic process - that is, as a purely affective-memorial process. Moreover, I believe that consideration of the development of moods opens the way for thinking about dynamic conflictual emotional processes in infants. Lastly, thinking about moods has important implications for understanding the development of pathology and for therapy.}, language = {en} } @misc{Tabachnick, author = {Tabachnick, Norman}, title = {Review Richard D. Chessick: Emotional Illness and Creativity, A Psychoanalytic and Ph{\´e}nom{\´e}nologie Study}, series = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 30 (2002), pp. 317-322.}, journal = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 30 (2002), pp. 317-322.}, language = {en} } @article{Sugar, author = {Sugar, Max}, title = {Commonalities Between the Isaac and Oedipus Myths: A Speculation}, series = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 30 (2002), pp. 691-706.}, journal = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 30 (2002), pp. 691-706.}, language = {en} } @article{Strozier, author = {Strozier, Charles B.}, title = {Some practical implications of a social-constructivist view of the psychoanalytic situation}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 12 (2002), pp. 361-380.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 12 (2002), pp. 361-380.}, abstract = {A discussion of the apocalyptic dimensions of the World Trade Center disaster, this paper considers some first-hand reports of the towers burning and collapsing, as well as the author's own experience that day watching events unfold and discussing these horrors with his patients. Several conceptual ideas are developed, including the varied ways people experienced the disaster in terms of >zones of sadness< the organic nature of the way the disaster unfolded the language of the victims in terms of underlying rhetorical structures of response and psycho-historical considerations that suggest, in part, why the disaster was such a collective trauma.}, language = {en} } @article{Stern, author = {Stern, Steven}, title = {The Analyst's Muse Commentary on Paper by Barbara Pizer}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 12 (2002), pp. 747-762.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 12 (2002), pp. 747-762.}, abstract = {The discussions by Pizer and Brandchaft are so different in tone and focus that I answer them separately. Pizer invites dialogue about the relationship between identification and dissociation, which I pursue further with him. I then briefly consider his therapeutic model, which emphasizes the negotiation of paradox, in the light of the identificatory divisions in self-experience that my model highlights. Finally, I address his concern that I bypassed the >crunch< of the repeated relationship in the case example of Jonathan. I argue that the stance I ultimately adopted was my way of bridging the paradoxes presented by Jonathan. Brandchaft couched his discussion as a dismissive attack, prompting me to defend myself while trying to engage in a dialogue about substantive issues. I respond to his criticisms regarding my epistemological position, my use of the concepts of identification and projective identification, and the process and outcome of my treatment of Jonathan. The bottom line is that the differences between our perspectives are not, as Brandchaft contends, those between an objectivist, causally >unidirectional< model and an intersubjective one, but rather those between two versions of intersubjectivity.}, language = {en} } @article{Stern, author = {Stern, Steven}, title = {The American Impact on Psychoanalysis}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 12 (2002), pp. 693-714.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 12 (2002), pp. 693-714.}, abstract = {This paper addresses the postmodern critique of unified-self theories that argues that the self is not unified but multiple, not a static entity but in constant flux, not a separate center of initiative but intersubjectively constituted. The author proposes that there are two kinds of division in self-experience: the dissociative divisions of multiple-self theory, and a division, akin to the divisions between Freud's structural agencies, between what are here termed the >intersubjective self< and >primary subjective experience.< In contrast to dissociated self-states, which occur in different moments in time, these two dimensions of self-experience occur simultaneously indeed, what is most important about them is their relationship. The author suggests that it is this intrapsychic relationship, as it occurs in a given psychological moment, that determines the qualities of self-experience that are emphasized in unified-self theories: such qualities as cohesiveness versus fragmentation authenticity vs. falseness vitality versus depletion optimal versus nonoptimal self-regulation and agency versus feeling one is at the mercy of others. Furthermore, a major organizer of the intersubjective self is early identifications, especially >identifications with the other's response to the self.< The implications of these concepts for therapeutic action are discussed and illustrated with an extended account of an analytic case.}, language = {en} } @article{Stern, author = {Stern, Donnel B.}, title = {Language and the Nonverbal as a Unity: Discussion of >Where Is the Action in the >Talking Curefemininity,< are explained as an inability to >kill< the primal murderous father, as the mythological Primal Horde. Freud's description of sons' (group members') hypnotic love for their father leader (which, that when not reciprocated, turns into masochistic submission), seems pertinent for the understanding of the sons' >return< to an archaic, cruel father imago. >Regression< to the father is compared with classical maternal regression.}, language = {en} } @article{Spezzano, author = {Spezzano, Charles}, title = {The bilingual self - thoughts from a scientific positivist or pragmatic psychoanalyst? Reply to Massey}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 12 (2002), pp. 899-913.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 12 (2002), pp. 899-913.}, abstract = {This paper is a response to an essay by Drew Westen. The author agrees with many of Westen's arguments about problems in the psychoanalytic literature and adds that the psychoanalytic literature has always been a problem for psychoanalysis. If we think of psychoanalysis as an ongoing experiment, then its >trials< are all the analytic sessions that have been conducted. Our >literature< has never systematically drawn on those. Westen critically scrutinizes certain habits that, in his view, haunt our literature, but that we do not explicitly note or disown as conceptual contrivances we mean to get rid of, while they are often misguiding clinical thinking and practice. I suggest that a fascinating question riding below the waves of Westen's paper is why patients and analysts accept this situation. I suggest that we all treat psychoanalysis as wisdom, art, relationship, skill, and something other than the application of established scientific findings because we recognize and accept it as that kind of human activity. It is unclear if patients care whether or not their analysts are scientists, but it is clear that analysts are not optimistic about sifting the research literature and finding clear clues to more effective clinical thinking, work, or writing.}, language = {en} } @article{Silvio, author = {Silvio, Joseph R.}, title = {A Streetcar Named Desire - Psychoanalytic Perspectives}, series = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 30 (2002), pp. 135-144.}, journal = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 30 (2002), pp. 135-144.}, language = {en} } @article{Silver, author = {Silver, Ann-Louise S.}, title = {Commentary on Mortal Gifts: A Two-Part Essay on the Therapist's Mortality}, series = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 30 (2002), pp. 205-208.}, journal = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 30 (2002), pp. 205-208.}, language = {en} } @article{Sherman, author = {Sherman, Eric}, title = {The Ailing Analyst and the Dying Patient: A Relational Perspective}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 12 (2002), pp. 687-691.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 12 (2002), pp. 687-691.}, language = {en} } @article{Sherman, author = {Sherman, Eric}, title = {Terror and Guilt: Beyond Them and Us}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 12 (2002), pp. 649-666.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 12 (2002), pp. 649-666.}, abstract = {Despite the recent interest in erotic countertransference and self-disclosure, little has been written about these phenomena when both analyst and patient are the same gender. Since homoerotic feelings can surface in any treatment, regardless of the participants' sexual orientation, this may well be a phobic avoidance that restricts many treatments, as well as our profession. I propose that the analyst's awareness of homoerotic feelings in the countertransference - including struggling with ways to express them - ultimately can create an atmosphere of safety. I offer an extended case example of one man with whom I colluded to ignore frightening aspects of his sexual fantasies. It was only by using my erotic countertransference, especially at a charged and pivotal moment, that I was able to help the patient begin to integrate split-off aspects of his sexuality.}, language = {en} } @article{Shapiro, author = {Shapiro, S.}, title = {The History of Feminism and Interpersonal Psychoanalysis.}, series = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 38 (2002), pp. 213-256.}, journal = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 38 (2002), pp. 213-256.}, language = {en} } @misc{Shapiro, author = {Shapiro, Robert B.}, title = {Book Review. Louis Breger, Freud: Darkness in the Midst of Vision.}, series = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 38 (2002), pp. 709 -717.}, journal = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 38 (2002), pp. 709 -717.}, language = {en} } @misc{Seligman, author = {Seligman, Stephen}, title = {Review Essay: The Vicissitudes of Freud's Surgical Metaphor}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 12 (2002), pp. 001-010.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 12 (2002), pp. 001-010.}, abstract = {Louis Sander's bold and ambitious theoretical synthesis deserves careful attention from psychoanalysts of all persuasions. Sander's cutting-edge approach draws on infant observation research, nonlinear dynamic systems theories, and current biology, physics, and other >hard< sciences. He is rethinking the psychoanalytic approach to psychic structure, motivation, and therapeutic action. In so doing, he updates Freud's project of linking psychoanalysis with scientific paradigms, but without reductionism, epistemological naivete, or an implicit antipsychological attitude. Sander emphasizes the dynamic relationships between elements in systems. His method draws parallels between the different levels of the functioning of natural systems, starting with the basic >biological< level of cells and organs and moving toward the psychic and interpersonal phenomena that are of greatest interest to psychoanalysts. In this way, he opens a window for a broad and inclusive >relational metapsychology.<}, language = {en} } @misc{Sander, author = {Sander, Louis W.}, title = {Review Essay: Theorizing Lesbian Desires: Challenges to Psychoanalyses}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 12 (2002), pp. 011-042.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 12 (2002), pp. 011-042.}, abstract = {As a way of integrating emerging knowledge of biological systems, developmental process, and therapeutic process, we identify principles in the process of exchange between organism and its context of life support that are present at all levels of complexity in living systems, from the cellular to the organization of consciousness. These principles range from specificity, rhythmicity, recurrence, and pattern to coherence, wholeness, and a relative unity in the organization of component parts. By proposing that these principles are also governing the exchange between mother and infant as they negotiate a sequence of essential tasks of adaptation, or >fitting-together< between them over the first years of life, the author suggests that the biological level becomes integrated with the developmental. A sequence of adaptive tasks extends from specificity of recognition in the newborn state, to recognition of inner awareness, purpose, and intention - shaping conscious organization. The bridge to the therapeutic level is constructed as therapist and patient build increasingly inclusive and coherent moments of recognition between themselves at the level of conscious organization, which act as corrective experiences, bringing the patient's own senses of >true self< and of >agency-to-initiate< to new levels of validity and competence.}, language = {en} } @article{Sageman, author = {Sageman, Sharon}, title = {Women with PTSD: The Psychodynamic Aspects of Psychopharmacologic and >Hands-On< Psychiatric Management}, series = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 30 (2002), pp. 415-428.}, journal = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 30 (2002), pp. 415-428.}, language = {en} } @article{Safran, author = {Safran, Jeremy D.}, title = {Sex, Lies, and Audiotape: Psychoanalysts Reflect on President Clinton's Impeachment}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 12 (2002), pp. 235-258.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 12 (2002), pp. 235-258.}, abstract = {In this article I. Reply to commentaries on my paper, >Brief Relational Psychoanalytic Treatment.< The discussants have raised a number of thoughtful and discerning questions that provide me with an opportunity to clarify some of the major points in my original article and to elaborate on certain issues in greater depth. Some of the key questions addressed in my. Reply are: (1) How is the tension between the emphasis on openness and receptivity and the time-limited nature of treatment negotiated in Brief Relational Psychoanalytic Treatment? (2) To what extent does an emphasis on openness and receptivity interfere with the process of establishing a productive focus? (3) How does one resolve the tension between the desire for change and the need for acceptance? (4) What are the therapeutic implications of regarding the mind as embodied and what roles do emotion and bodily felt experience play in the change process? In addition, I take up the question of whether or not adhering to a constructivist epistemology is incompatible with conducting and valuing psychotherapy research.}, language = {en} } @article{Safran, author = {Safran, Jeremy D.}, title = {Self psychology: Later, the same day response to editors' follow-up questions}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 12 (2002), pp. 171-195.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 12 (2002), pp. 171-195.}, abstract = {In this article I describe an approach to brief psychoanalytic treatment that is consistent with many of the key principles of the relational tradition. In this approach the treatment process is conceptualized as an ongoing cycle of therapeutic enactment, disembedding, and understanding, enactment and disembedding. Particular emphasis is placed on the use of countertransference disclosure for purposes of facilitating the collaborative exploration of relational scenarios that are being unwittingly enacted between patient and therapist. The influence of the brief time frame on the treatment process is explored and differences between the current approach and other approaches to brief psychoanalytic treatment are examined. A case is presented to illustrate the approach, and a number of questions are explored regarding the nature of change in short-versus long-term treatments.}, language = {en} } @article{Saakvitne, author = {Saakvitne, Karen W.}, title = {Something old, something new. Commentary on Steven Stern's >needed relationships<}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 12 (2002), pp. 443-449.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 12 (2002), pp. 443-449.}, abstract = {When both therapist and client share a traumatic event, there are multiple levels of vulnerability to traumatization for the therapist. Our personal vulnerability is not only a backdrop for our clinical work but also an acknowledged fact in many therapeutic relationships, a situation that changes the frame of the work. In addition to clinical challenges, shared trauma increases a therapist's vulnerability to vicarious traumatization VT is defined as the negative transformation of the therapist's inner experience as a result of his or her empathic engagement with and responsibility for a traumatized client. Emphasizing the importance of awareness, self-care, meaning, and community, the article summarizes important steps to anticipate, address, and transform the therapist's experience of vicarious traumatization.}, language = {en} } @article{Rotenberg, author = {Rotenberg, Carl T.}, title = {Commentary on Bernard J. Paris: Daniel Deronda and Gwendolen Harleth: A Therapeutic Relationship}, series = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 30 (2002), pp. 123-134.}, journal = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 30 (2002), pp. 123-134.}, language = {en} } @article{RossFavero, author = {Ross, Donald R. and Favero, Marcus}, title = {The Experience of Borderline Phenomena through Cinema: Quentin Tarantino's Reservoir Dogs, True Romance, and Pulp Fiction}, series = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 30 (2002), pp. 489-508.}, journal = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 30 (2002), pp. 489-508.}, language = {en} } @article{Rosica, author = {Rosica, Karen}, title = {Serving Ambivalence: Commentary on Paper by Jeremy Safran}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 12 (2002), pp. 227-234.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 12 (2002), pp. 227-234.}, abstract = {Change - what prevents it, what nurtures it, and what maintains it - is a current that runs throughout the history of psychoanalytic theorizing. While knowledge, in the form of insight, remains an important antidote to repetition, awareness of the here-and-now process of the clinical experience has taken a new place in more recent theoretical understanding. In looking at these questions of change, this commentary offers some additional theories to those already expressed by Safran.}, language = {en} } @article{Plakun, author = {Plakun, Eric M.}, title = {Jihad, McWorld and Enactment in the Postmodern Mental Health World}, series = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 30 (2002), pp. 341-354.}, journal = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 30 (2002), pp. 341-354.}, language = {en} } @article{Pizer, author = {Pizer, Stuart A.}, title = {Sociorelational Psychoanalysis and Agency: Reply to Commentary}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 12 (2002), pp. 317-330.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 12 (2002), pp. 317-330.}, abstract = {The author appreciates the careful reading and thoughtful reviews by Sue Elkind, Sam Gerson, and Howard Levine. Elkind's review particularly captures and articulates many of the key ideas in the book Building Bridges: The Negotiation of Paradox in Psychoanalysis and creatively applies concepts of negotiation, paradox, an inherently multiple >distributed self,< and metaphor in her own work consulting on treatment impasses. Gerson incisively focuses on the core idea of recognizing, accepting, and bridging differences and contradictions in personal, and national, perspectives he also articulates an understanding of the attempt of relational analytic writers to bridge the intrapsychic and the interpersonal with due recognition of each. The author replies extensively to Levine's comparison of Pizer's work with that of Semrad and other >classical< analysts and challenges Levine's premise that a relational perspective, grounded as it is in a two-person contextual psychology, ignores or devalues interpretation, insight, free association, and autonomous mental functioning. Quoting from clinical material in his book, Pizer presents the outcome of a >relational< analysis in terms of the patient's increased access to internal >potential space,< unconscious experience, curiosity, and reflectiveness about the mental life of self and other, and an increased ability to value personal experience in relationship and in solitude.}, language = {en} } @article{Pizer, author = {Pizer, Stuart A.}, title = {The American Independent Tradition: Loewald, Erikson, and the (Possible) Rise of Intersubjective Ego Psychology}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 12 (2002), pp. 715-725.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 12 (2002), pp. 715-725.}, abstract = {In this discussion of Stern's rich and thoughtful contribution to the dialogue between unified- and multiple-self theories, I refer to his earlier conceptualization of repeated and needed relationships. I thus highlight how his current model strikes me as shifting his emphasis toward identificatory factors, both in development and in clinical process, and away from the working through, or negotiation of, repetitions of relational configurations. Through Stern's clinical examples, I engage dialogue about how his construct of an >intersubjective self< relates to the qualities of multiplicity he accounts for in his theory. And I consider the implications for clinical technique of favoring identificatory influences over the analyst's living through the experience of transference repetitions with the patient and thereby introducing ameliorating responses from within, rather than from a stance more external to, embeddedness in transference-countertransference repetitions.}, language = {en} } @article{Pizer, author = {Pizer, Barbara}, title = {The Analyst's Unconscious Contribution to the Impassse Commentary on Paper by Stuart A. Pizer}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 12 (2002), pp. 837-846.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 12 (2002), pp. 837-846.}, abstract = {In my discussion of Graham Bass's paper, my comments fall under three main categories: an aspect of Bass's theoretical/technical view that informs his conscious clinical choices, his incredible work with Robert as presented in the written case, and, finally, theory in practice as exemplified in his phrase, >inadvertent touch.< I mean for my perspective and the purely personal associations that are stimulated by this case to evoke further discussion and, in general, open some sort of useful dialogue. I believe that anybody who sits with severely dissociated patients would agree that, side-by-side with the necessary terror creeping around in the room, we often experience a confusing, sometimes even silly, >higgledy-piggledy< that seems pathognomonic to the work entailed. This weird experience seems, almost, to set our sense of continuity and logic on its edge. When reading Bass's paper, we must, to maintain our equilibrium, begin by taking for granted some of the contradictory, nonlinear aspects of his reporting, which is, after all, an accurate reflection of what happens in this work. At the level of theory in practice, I consider the implications for symbolic realization in the clinical process when touch need not be relegated to the category of the >inadvertent.<}, language = {en} } @article{Pinsky, author = {Pinsky, Ellen}, title = {Mortal Gifts: A Two-Part Essay on the Therapist's Mortality}, series = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 30 (2002), pp. 173-204.}, journal = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 30 (2002), pp. 173-204.}, language = {en} } @article{Phillips, author = {Phillips, James}, title = {State of the Hope: The New Bad Object in the Therapeutic Action of Psychoanalysis}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 12 (2002), pp. 485-497.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 12 (2002), pp. 485-497.}, abstract = {Paul Stepansky's study of Freud's surgical metaphor provides an illuminating chapter in the intellectual history of psychoanalysis. He first describes the context and development of the surgical metaphor in Freud's early theorizing. He then develops a complex aftermath that includes on the one hand Freud's own abandonment of the metaphor and on the other hand the post-Freudian history of surgery and psychoanalysis, including psychoanalytic responses to those psychiatric concretizations of the metaphor in shock therapy and lobotomy. Following an exposition of Stepansky's study of the surgical metaphor, the reviewer comments on the twin questions of why Freud adopted the metaphor and why he abandoned it, questions on which Stepansky dwells at length. Regarding the first, the reviewer suggests that Stepansky's historical analysis can be expanded to include Freud's use of the metaphor to sustain misogynistic impulses of 19th-century gynecologists. Regarding the second, the reviewer further develops Stepansky's point that, because of its inherent limitations, the metaphor outlived its usefulness and was thus abandoned.}, language = {en} } @article{Phillips, author = {Phillips, Adam}, title = {Talking About Talking About Patients}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 12 (2002), pp. 621-625.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 12 (2002), pp. 621-625.}, abstract = {This response questions the heuristic value, not to mention the ironies of subjectivity as a useful psychoanalytic concept (and tool). It intimates that the dilemmas of a child analyst at work are, whatever else they are, a function of the history of child analysis.}, language = {en} } @article{Peyer, author = {Peyer, Janine de}, title = {Supervision: The Devil Is in the Details}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 12 (2002), pp. 545-549.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 12 (2002), pp. 545-549.}, language = {en} } @article{Peyer, author = {Peyer, Janine de}, title = {Subjectivity, complexity and the social world Erikson's identity concept and contemporary relational theories}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 12 (2002), pp. 509-530.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 12 (2002), pp. 509-530.}, abstract = {This clinical paper explores the meanings and evolution of an analyst's reaction of fear in relation to her patient's sexualized aggression. From both an intrapsychic and an intersubjective perspective, the author analyzes the coconstruction of this transference - countertransference phenomenon. Case vignettes illustrate the author's attempts to address her patient's sexualized aggression while struggling to free herself from the feelings of intimidation and fearfulness stirred by his sadomasochistic fantasies and patterns of interaction. The analyst's unconscious identification with the patient's disowned femininity and narcissistic vulnerability is seen as central to this countertransference >stranglehold.< Release from the analyst's masochistic position comes through a shift in her own affective participation. The importance of the analyst's recognizing her own unconscious contributions to this sadomasochistic dynamic is emphasized and elaborated. Discussion also focuses on the relevance of gender to the issue of countertransference fear, as illustrated in this particular male patient - female analyst dyad.}, language = {en} } @article{Paris, author = {Paris, Bernard J.}, title = {Daniel Deronda and Gwendolen Haiieth: A Therapeutic Relationship?}, series = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 30 (2002), pp. 099-122.}, journal = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 30 (2002), pp. 099-122.}, language = {en} } @article{Palombo, author = {Palombo, Stanley R.}, title = {Commentary on >Behind, Beneath, Above and Beyond: The Historical Unconscious<}, series = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 30 (2002), pp. 231-232.}, journal = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 30 (2002), pp. 231-232.}, language = {en} } @article{Orlandini, author = {Orlandini, Alvise}, title = {Facing Sexual Violence in a Rape Emergency Room: Identification, Projective Identification, and the Myth of Nemesis}, series = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 30 (2002), pp. 401-414.}, journal = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 30 (2002), pp. 401-414.}, language = {en} } @article{Orbach, author = {Orbach, Susie}, title = {Subjectivity, Infantile Oedipus, and Symbolization in Melanie Klein and Jacques Lacan}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 12 (2002), pp. 531-535.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 12 (2002), pp. 531-535.}, abstract = {This paper examines a state of fear aroused in the analyst during a session. I suggest that the fear arose from the attempt to enter the patient's mental state - a state that was unfamiliar to the analyst. In entering what was essentially psychically foreign territory, I terrified myself with a version of the patient's experience.}, language = {en} } @article{Orbach, author = {Orbach, Suzie}, title = {Something Is Happening Here Thoughts and Clinical Material Regarding Multiplicity, Gender, and Touch in a Psychoanalytic Treatment}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 12 (2002), pp. 433-441.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 12 (2002), pp. 433-441.}, abstract = {This paper discusses the impulse to psychic and political splitting with its consequent political demonization of the other when emotional helplessness and fear cannot be metabolized. I argue that it is through an acceptance of our feelings of helplessness that we are in a position to experience the subjectivity of the other and to begin the process of political discourse.}, language = {en} } @article{Olarte, author = {Olarte, Silvia W.}, title = {Walter Bonime: 1904-2001}, series = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 30 (2002), pp. 545-546.}, journal = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 30 (2002), pp. 545-546.}, language = {en} } @article{Moss, author = {Moss, Donald}, title = {Some thoughts on the use of language in psychoanalysis}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 12 (2002), pp. 421-432.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 12 (2002), pp. 421-432.}, abstract = {The author argues that terrorism aims to obliterate the conditions that allow us to distinguish between situations of safety and situations of danger. If we are unable to make that elemental distinction, we necessarily doubt the value of our own immediate thoughts, perceptions, and ideas. Psychoanalytic theory offers an alternative to immediacy. I think psychoanalytically about an object, one must identify with it and doing so to think of what the terrorists meant we must find a way to identify with them. This entails consciously working against the strong appeals of disidentification. Disidentification is the precondition for pitilessness and, as such, is the precondition for limitless activities directed against the objects of our hatred. It matters what the terrorists meant, then. It matters that we find our way to identifying with what we think they meant. The moment we conclude that it does not matter, we loosen the checks on our own capacities for terrorizing.}, language = {en} } @misc{Mohacsy, author = {Mohacsy, Ildiko}, title = {Review Anna Hurry (Ed.): Psychoanalytic Monographs No. 3. Psychoanalysis and Developmental Therapy}, series = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 30 (2002), pp. 311-314.}, journal = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 30 (2002), pp. 311-314.}, language = {en} } @misc{Modell, author = {Modell, Arnold H.}, title = {Review Louis A. Sass: Madness and Modernism: Insanity in the Light of Modern Art, Literature, and Thought}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 12 (2002), pp. 055-063.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 12 (2002), pp. 055-063.}, abstract = {In the context of Sander's contribution to developmental theory, the author examines a variety of subjects, including intentionality, the concept of representation, and consciousness. Also discussed are the limitations of applying a developmental analogy to psychoanalytic treatment.}, language = {en} } @misc{Mitchell, author = {Mitchell, Stephen A.}, title = {Review of Disputed Subjects by Jane Flax}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 12 (2002), pp. 065-071.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 12 (2002), pp. 065-071.}, abstract = {This paper emphasizes the clinical relevance of Sander's work and links it to the contemporary relational turn in psychoanalytic thought. Similarities to the original work of Sullivan and Fairbairn are noted, and broader commonalities with the new psychoanalytic developments are then developed. From this vantage point, two specific clinical advantages of Sander's approach are discussed. First, it focuses on interpersonal behavior, that is, on what people actually do with each other. Second, it explores a series of dialectics that are central to psychoanalytic process. These include those between complexity and unity, differences and continuity, and change and recurrence. Finally, a clinical vignette is presented, in which a shift in the tone of the supervisory interaction had a direct effect on the therapist - patient interaction and thus on the outcome of the therapy.}, language = {en} } @article{Miller, author = {Miller, Julie}, title = {Heroin Addiction: The Needle as Transitional Object}, series = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 30 (2002), pp. 293-305.}, journal = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 30 (2002), pp. 293-305.}, language = {en} } @article{Merlino, author = {Merlino, Joseph P.}, title = {A Royal Road from Homelessness - The Clinical Use of Dreams}, series = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 30 (2002), pp. 583-594.}, journal = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 30 (2002), pp. 583-594.}, language = {en} } @article{Mendelsohn, author = {Mendelsohn, Eric}, title = {Some Contributions of Empirical Infant Research to Adult Psychoanalysis: What Have We Learned? How Can We Apply It?}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 12 (2002), pp. 331-358.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 12 (2002), pp. 331-358.}, abstract = {The term >bad-enough< participation refers, in a general sense, to the inevitable ways that all analysts cause their patients to suffer and, more specificaelly, within each analysis, to the ways in which the analyst's participation confirms some version of the patient's worst fears. These manifestations of >badness,< as long as they are honestly considered and creatively used, are expectable, and even therapeutically essential, aspects of analytic relatedness. Frequently, however, an analyst's bad-enough participation, despite its ubiquity and transformational potential, is attenuated or selectively overlooked. As a result, the therapeutic possibilities of analytic work may be compromised. In this paper the analyst's bad-enough participation is considered conceptually, and an argument is advanced for its therapeutic salience. Two cases are discussed, the first involving a treatment impasse, and the second, the beginning phase of a long-term treatment.}, language = {en} } @article{Lijtmaer, author = {Lijtmaer, Ruth}, title = {Psychoanalysis and Visual Art: A Female Painter and Her Dilemma}, series = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 30 (2002), pp. 475-488.}, journal = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 30 (2002), pp. 475-488.}, language = {en} } @article{Levine, author = {Levine, Howard B.}, title = {Social construction and psychoanalytic promise. Commentary on paper by Michael J. Bader}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 12 (2002), pp. 305-315.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 12 (2002), pp. 305-315.}, abstract = {Pizer's views challenge the traditional classical assumption that insight is the main curative factor in psychoanalysis. Instead, he sees therapeutic change following upon a process of relationally determined interactions (the negotiation of paradox). Thus, his theory of therapeutic action privileges experience and a particular form of interaction over insight and the acquisition of knowledge about the self. In this commentary, I examine Pizer's views of therapeutic action and the dialectic of insight versus experience by locating them in relation to the work and views of Elvin Semrad, a dominant figure in Boston psychoanalysis from the early 1950s until his death in 1976. Semrad played a central role in the training of Paul Russell, who, in turn, had an important influence on Pizer. Following Semrad, I suggest that self-knowledge obtained through self-reflection, whether assisted, observed, or self-mediated, serves as an important scaffold on which experience and sense of self are integrated or constructed and gives continuity, coherence, and meaning to life. I believe that this dimension of human growth and development has been underemphasized in Pizer's work and needs to be better integrated into his and other relational, two-person models of therapeutic action.}, language = {en} } @article{Langan, author = {Langan, R.}, title = {Portals.}, series = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 38 (2002), pp. 477-484.}, journal = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 38 (2002), pp. 477-484.}, language = {en} } @article{Kwawer, author = {Kwawer, Jay S.}, title = {Developmental Perspectives in Fromm's Psychoanalysis: A Response to Biancoli.}, series = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 38 (2002), pp. 623-634.}, journal = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 38 (2002), pp. 623-634.}, language = {en} } @article{Kramer, author = {Kramer, Milton}, title = {The Biology of Dream Formation: A Review and Critique}, series = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 30 (2002), pp. 657-672.}, journal = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 30 (2002), pp. 657-672.}, language = {en} } @article{Kolod, author = {Kolod, Susan}, title = {Between Women: Love and Combat.}, series = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 38 (2002), pp. 315-328.}, journal = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 38 (2002), pp. 315-328.}, language = {en} } @article{Kolk, author = {Kolk, Bessel A. van der}, title = {Some theoretical comments on personal isolation}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 12 (2002), pp. 381-392.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 12 (2002), pp. 381-392.}, abstract = {When people develop PTSD in the wake of exposure to a traumatic event, the imprint of that trauma comes to dominate how they organize their way in the world. Verbalizing, making meaning, and putting the event in contezt may provide a means of feeling understood, rejoining the human race, and gaining perspective on the experience, but it may do, little toreorganize the person to feel safe and focused on fulfilling the demands of the present. Given the subcortical nature of trauma imprints, effctive therapy needs to help survivors tolerate the sensory reminders of the trauma, and physically experience efficacy and purpose in response to stimuli that once triggered feelings of helplessness and dependence.}, language = {en} } @article{Kawabata, author = {Kawabata, N.}, title = {Book Review. Haruki Murakami, Underground.}, series = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 38 (2002), pp. 533-540.}, journal = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 38 (2002), pp. 533-540.}, language = {en} } @article{KatzNathaniel, author = {Katz, Craig L. and Nathaniel, Roger}, title = {Disasters, Psychiatry, and Psychodynamics}, series = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 30 (2002), pp. 519-530.}, journal = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 30 (2002), pp. 519-530.}, language = {en} } @article{Kaplan, author = {Kaplan, Kalman J.}, title = {Isaac Versus Oedipus: An Alternative View}, series = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 30 (2002), pp. 707-718.}, journal = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 30 (2002), pp. 707-718.}, language = {en} } @article{Kagan, author = {Kagan, Alan}, title = {Commentary on Eric M. Plakun >Jihad, McWorld and Enactment in the Postmodern Mental Health World<}, series = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 30 (2002), pp. 357-360.}, journal = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 30 (2002), pp. 357-360.}, language = {en} } @article{Insaf, author = {Insaf, Shahid}, title = {Not the Same by Any Other Name}, series = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 30 (2002), pp. 463-474.}, journal = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 30 (2002), pp. 463-474.}, language = {en} } @article{Ingram, author = {Ingram, Douglas H.}, title = {Toward a New Name, Toward a New Mission}, series = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 30 (2002), pp. 001-002.}, journal = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 30 (2002), pp. 001-002.}, language = {en} } @article{Howell, author = {Howell, Elizabeth F.}, title = {The centrality of selfobject experience in psychological relatedness response to editors' follow-up questions}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 12 (2002), pp. 971-986.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 12 (2002), pp. 971-986.}, abstract = {An overarching thematic implication of both Grand's discussion of my article and my. Reply to her discussion is the need for sharing and integration of knowledge and concepts belonging to the separate fields of psychoanalysis and the trauma/dissociation. Grand and I have different expressive voices, both singular and plural, which, I conjecture, are in part reflective of different traditions. Grand's response demonstrates eloquently a problem facing both psychoanalysis and the field of trauma treatment: the tendency of fields, like individuals, to proceed in isolation deprives all from the benefit of shared information. Procrustean beds cannot be shared.}, language = {en} }