@article{Zhang, author = {Zhang, Ling}, title = {A Study on Social Filter in Howard Goldblatt's Translation of >I Did Not Kill My Husband< 从社会过滤器看葛浩文的英译《我不是潘金莲》] [application of Fromm's theories to art]}, series = {Foreign Language and Literature Research [外国语文研究], No. 4 (2017), pp. 97-105.}, journal = {Foreign Language and Literature Research [外国语文研究], No. 4 (2017), pp. 97-105.}, abstract = {本文尝试应用弗洛姆的社会过滤器理论,从语言、逻辑和社会禁忌三方面对葛浩文英译《我不是潘金莲》文本中的过滤现象进行分析。研究发现,葛浩文对原文的过滤方法具有多样性,但总体上以归化为主。}, language = {zh} } @article{Zhang, author = {Zhang, Ling}, title = {Fromm's View of Psychology [弗洛姆的心理学观研究]}, series = {Theory Research [学理论], No. 4 (2019), pp. 59-61.}, journal = {Theory Research [学理论], No. 4 (2019), pp. 59-61.}, abstract = {随着社会发展,西方新马克思主义研究运动悄然升温,自从20世纪30年代以来西方心理学中就兴起了许多心理学趋向马克思主义的研究流派。弗洛姆是法兰克福学派成员之一,他在继承弗洛伊德精神分析理论基础上,研究马克思主义思想,坚持用人文与社会科学的方法来研究人的心理。创造了著名的异化理论、社会性格理论等。中国是坚持马克思主义一元论的国家,主流意识是马克思主义意识形态。因而研究弗洛姆马克思主义心理学思想,对于丰富和指导国内心理学研究,具有重要的学术意义和应用价值。}, language = {zh} } @article{Zhang, author = {Zhang, Ling}, title = {On Contemporary College Students' Happiness Education View Based Fromm Thought about Happiness [基于弗洛姆幸福思想视角谈当代大学生幸福观教育]}, series = {Teacher [教师], No. 35 (2015), p. 10.}, journal = {Teacher [教师], No. 35 (2015), p. 10.}, abstract = {随着全球化、一体化的推进,我国市场经济迅速发展,大学生作为一个特殊的群体,幸福观教育面临着诸多挑战。本文分析和总结了弗洛姆幸福思想的基本内涵,以期为我们今天探索当代大学生的幸福观教育提供理论和实践上的指引。}, language = {zh} } @misc{Zhang, author = {Zhang, Ling}, title = {Social Filter Theoretical Perspective on Howard Goldblatt's Translation of >The Field of Life and Death< - Taking Ge Haowen's English translation of >Life and Death Field< as an Example [社会过滤器视角下文学翻译研究 -以葛浩文英译《生死场》为例 ], Master thesis, English Language and Literature, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, Hubei, China 2017 [application of Fromm's theories to art].}, abstract = {翻译是一项跨文化的人类交流活动,由于文化具有个性,因此不同文化间的对等翻译是不可能实现的,在将由一种语言所承载的文化转换为由另一种语言来承载时,定会出现损失现象。翻译过程中的文化缺失现象早已引起了译界的广泛关注,但在过去漫长的时间里,译界对该现象的研究却一直局限于语言层面,多是借用语言学理论来对其进行分析。直到二十世纪七十年代多元系统理论被提出以来,人们才逐渐意识到翻译的跨学科性质,开始致力于从众多其他学科中寻求理论支撑。在此过程中,哲学对翻译的指导作用日益凸显并激起了学者的高度热情。鉴于翻译是一种社会活动,因此翻译批评决不能忽视特定的社会因素的制约,这种制约用西方哲学家弗洛姆的话来说就是>社会过滤器<,本文拟以弗洛姆的社会过滤器为理论基础来研究葛浩文翻译的《生死场》英译本中的文化过滤现象,希望能有助于扩展翻译批评的理论视野,加深人们对翻译的社会属性的认识。>社会过滤器<概念是弗洛姆在解释社会无意识理论过程中提出的一种社会过滤机制,弗洛姆认为正是>社会过滤器<横亘在经验与意识之间,阻止某些经验转换为意识。翻译总是在一定的社会环境中进行,受某些社会因素的制约,因此,以>社会过滤器<为理论基础进行翻译研究符合翻译活动的社会属性。《生死场》是我国当代作家萧红的成名作,小说讲述了九一八前夕哈尔滨近郊一个村庄的乡民们的生活情状。原作中独特的语言风格和文化元素给翻译带来了巨大挑战。葛浩文先生曾在译者前言部分明确表示为了适应读者的审美倾向,他在翻译过程中不得不删改了原文的部分内容。可见,即使是像葛浩文这样的翻译大家,在翻译诸如《生死场》这样充满乡土气息的文学作品时,也没能摆脱社会过滤器的束缚。然而,正是这样的英译本,自1979年出版以来,却一直深受外国读者的喜爱。因此,对该译本进行研究一定能为翻译实践提供可资借鉴的经验。但截止到目前,译界对这一译文的研究少之又少,更谈不上全面性和系统性的批评了。本研究以《生死场》的英译本为研究对象,通过仔细对比原文与译文,并查询往期关于对葛浩文和他的翻译思想的研究,分别从语言、逻辑、社会禁忌三方面分析了译者在翻译过程中对原文本的处理,发现葛浩文对语言,逻辑,社会禁忌三个方面的内容的过滤力度并不是一致的,他对语言和逻辑的过滤力度较小,在以归化为主,异化为辅的翻译策略的指导下,主要过滤掉了原文的表达方式,而在意义上则做到了忠实于原文,但对社会禁忌的过滤力度则相对较大,主要通过采用归化和替代,过滤掉了原文的文化内涵和意义,仅仅保留了其功能。2017年是萧红逝75周年,此论文一方面算作译界在译本方面对葛浩文翻译研究的有效补充,另一方面作者也希望借此文向民国才女萧红致敬。}, language = {zh} } @misc{Zhang, author = {Zhang, Ling}, title = {The Symbolical Meaning of Technology and Its Effect on Social Psychology [技术的符号意义及对社会心理的影响], Master thesis, Philosophy of Science and Technology, Wuhan Polytechnic University, Wuhan, Hubei, China 2007, 51 pp.}, abstract = {At the beginning of technology, it was taken seriously by people because of its tremendous material benefits. But people have seemingly ignored the correlation between technology and social psychology when they take material benefits seriously. Technology is created by people' rationality, so it is normally imprinted by human psychology. It is seemingly insignificant to pay more attention to this one-way correlation. But at present, this one-way correlation has gone and never comes back. Social psychology need still leads the direction of technical development, but at the same time, technology has affected the development of social psychology. According to this, the main body of this article tries to look upon the technology as a one kind of peculiar symbol and study its effect on social psychology by using >Symbolic Interactionism<. Through the analysis on a lot of technical examples, we realize that with changing the way of communication, technology has affected social psychology on two aspects: active and negative one. Technology has satisfied the feelings of freedom, agreement and vent and its application has benefits on maintaining social mentality and defending the harmonious development of entire human society. But at the same time, technology also upsets the human being's socialization course, breaks up human groups, makes social psychology tend to become more and more distant and attacks the moral concepts existed in social psychology. We cannot deny the active effect of technology on social psychology, but we also cannot ignore its negative effect. On further analysis, we realize that this negative effect should be attributed to the alienation of social psychology. The alienation makes people lose their self-determination of psychology. Social psychology has controlled by technology, becomes a slave of technology and manifests a kind of trend of technologization. That is one of the important manifestation of modernity crisis. Under the push of >Gestell<, human society is also more and more like a >technology field< and a difficult position of the modern rational person has been formed from this. Then can we not rotate this trend?- The main body of this article tries to find a way to avoid alienation and makes technology go well with social psychology by using >Humanization of Technological Society< of Fromm. We can think that it is a feasible way to pay more attention to people themselves, push the prefect of social psychology and the reasonable application of technology and lead the development of technology rationally by technology morality and humanity spirit.}, language = {zh} }