@misc{GiustinoScharff, author = {Giustino, Gabriella and Scharff, Jill Savege}, title = {Psychoanalysis online: An interview with Jill Savege Scharff}, series = {International Forum of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 30 (No. 3, 2021), pp. 176-177.}, journal = {International Forum of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 30 (No. 3, 2021), pp. 176-177.}, abstract = {Gabriella Giustino interviews Jill Savege Scharff, editor of the book Psychoanalysis online, after the rapid shift to teleanalysis, recommended by the American Psychoanalytic Association in response to COVID-19 restrictions on personal movement.}, language = {en} } @article{ScharffHedegard, author = {Scharff, Jill Savege and Hedegard, Pat}, title = {Change across a completed analysis assessed using a modified Three-Level Model}, series = {International Forum of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 29 (No. 4, 2020), pp. 242-254.}, journal = {International Forum of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 29 (No. 4, 2020), pp. 242-254.}, abstract = {The authors present their design for a clinical teaching exercise to study transformation in psychoanalysis. They chose a completed analysis from which to select the sessions retrospectively so that the clinical review exercise would not influence ongoing analytic process. The co-authors selected three tranches of clinical material, a few years apart, to be presented by the analyst. They studied the material with colleagues in the impressionistic manner of traditional clinical review, and then subjected it to more systematic examination, using a modified application of the Three-Level Model (3-LM) for assessing change. Their prediction was that the use of the 3-LM model could amplify the clinical impressions of the individual analyst and provide a way of being more specific about the changes, if any, that had occurred, and arrive at which theories best explained those changes.}, language = {en} } @article{ScharffSehon, author = {Scharff, Jill Savege and Sehon, Caroline M.}, title = {The use of a simple writing task to enhance psychoanalytic education}, series = {International Forum of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 29 (No. 4, 2020), pp. 215-223.}, journal = {International Forum of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 29 (No. 4, 2020), pp. 215-223.}, abstract = {The authors describe a simple recurrent writing task called the >Two Page Paper Exercise,< designed to enhance candidates' learning of analytic theory and technique. They set this task in the context of other analytic institutes' writing programs and show that this exercise is unique. Their educational philosophy is that, as candidates confront multiple perspectives in contemporary psychoanalysis, this writing task develops their ability to conceptualize, reflect on their learning, integrate affect and cognition, and express their ideas to others in written form and in discussion with peers. The candidate group develops cohesion that reduces writing anxiety. As individuals they develop a writing habit that supports the eventual duty to develop the field of psychoanalysis through publishing. The authors present raw data from candidates' writing for readers to make their own assessment of the usefulness of the task as a measure of candidates' integration of learning, development of analytic sensibility and synthetic capacity, and communication of experience and ideas to others.}, language = {en} }