@article{Šebekand, author = {Šebekand, Michael}, title = {Reply to Carolyn Clement's commentary}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 10 (2000), pp. 315-317.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 10 (2000), pp. 315-317.}, language = {en} } @article{Zubke, author = {Zubke, Friedhelm}, title = {Erich Fromm - ein Anreger f{\"u}r Denken und Handeln im 21. Jahrhundert!?}, series = {P{\"a}dagogik, No. 3, 2000, pp. 38-42.}, journal = {P{\"a}dagogik, No. 3, 2000, pp. 38-42.}, language = {de} } @article{Zeddies, author = {Zeddies, T. J.}, title = {Psychoanalytic praxis and the moral vision of psychoanalysis: Brief communication in a paper by Kenneth Eisold.}, series = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 36 (2000), pp. 521-528.}, journal = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 36 (2000), pp. 521-528.}, language = {en} } @article{Zbrevek, author = {Zbrevek, Slavoj}, title = {Repeating pathological relationships to disconfirm pathogenic beliefs. Commentary on Steven Stern's >needed relationhsips<}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 10 (2000), pp. 271-275.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 10 (2000), pp. 271-275.}, language = {en} } @article{Zaphiropoulos, author = {Zaphiropoulos, Miltiades}, title = {The ineffable articulated.}, series = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 36 (2000), pp. 281-288.}, journal = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 36 (2000), pp. 281-288.}, language = {en} } @article{Zabriskie, author = {Zabriskie, Beverley}, title = {Reply to commentaries}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 10 (2000), pp. 389-402.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 10 (2000), pp. 389-402.}, language = {en} } @article{Yovell, author = {Yovell, Yoram}, title = {Affect Theory and the Neurobiology of Affective Dysregulation}, series = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 28 (2000), pp. 467-482.}, journal = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 28 (2000), pp. 467-482.}, language = {en} } @article{YoungEisendrath, author = {Young-Eisendrath, Polly}, title = {Reply to commentaries}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 10 (2000), pp. 427-441.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 10 (2000), pp. 427-441.}, language = {en} } @article{Ying, author = {Ying, Guoliang}, title = {Comments on Fromm's Language Filter Function Theory [评弗洛姆的语言过滤功能论]}, series = {Inner Mongolia Social Sciences [内蒙古社会科学(汉文版)], No. 3 (2000), pp. 20-23.}, journal = {Inner Mongolia Social Sciences [内蒙古社会科学(汉文版)], No. 3 (2000), pp. 20-23.}, abstract = {弗洛姆对语言的认识有一个新颖的视角 ,这就是他十分重视语言对社会意识的过滤功能 ,提出人们的经验要成为社会意识是有条件的 ,即必须经过社会过滤器的过滤。语言是社会过滤器的重要组成部分 ,具有重要的意识过滤功能。他的这一研究是源于法兰克福学派的理论传统 ,即社会批判的需要。本文作者认为 ,弗洛姆所揭示的语言的社会意识过滤理论 ,有助于更深入地理解马克思主义语言学 ,有助于具体地理解语言与思维的密切关系 ,语言对思想和社会意识的筛选作用 ,以便我们正面地、积极地运用语言的这一功能}, language = {zh} } @article{Yao, author = {Yao, Dazhi}, title = {The Ideology Theory of Western Marxism [方马克思主义的意识形态理论]}, series = {[Contemporary Foreign Marxism Research Conference], July 2000, Shanghai, China, in [Proceedings]: Contemporary Foreign Marxist Review (First Series), The Journal of the Center for Contemporary Marxism Abroad (Fudan University)[当代国外马克思主义评论(第一辑)], No. 1 (07.01.2000), 109-124, 344-345.}, journal = {[Contemporary Foreign Marxism Research Conference], July 2000, Shanghai, China, in [Proceedings]: Contemporary Foreign Marxist Review (First Series), The Journal of the Center for Contemporary Marxism Abroad (Fudan University)[当代国外马克思主义评论(第一辑)], No. 1 (07.01.2000), 109-124, 344-345.}, abstract = {This paper gives a summary of the ideology theory of Western Marxism. There are four main parts in this paper. The first, it is on the essence of ideology, the main thoughts of three representatives Althusser, Luk{\´a}cs, Habermas, are introduced . Both Althusser and Luk{\´a}cs oppose ideology to science, but Althusser affirms science and criticize ideology, and Luk{\´a}cs reverse it. Habermas' thought is different from them, he identifies the science with ideology. The second, as to the revolution of ideology, Luk{\´a}cs regards proletariat ideology as the precondition of revolution, and Gramsci regards ideology as an independent field in a society. It is important to control it. The third, the relation between ideology and legitimization, Poulantzas and Habermas pay more attention to the relation between legitimization of politics and ideology. Ideology is the foundation of legitimization of political order. The fourth, as to Critical ideology, Frankfurt School is the main representative, especially Marcuse's One Dimensional Man and Fromm's analysis of social psychology. It is very important to study ideology theory, ideology play a key role in social life.}, language = {zh} }