@article{Adams, author = {Adams, Michael Vannoy}, title = {Racial Enactments in Dynamic Treatment}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 10 (2000), pp. 127-142.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 10 (2000), pp. 127-142.}, language = {en} } @article{Adams, author = {Adams, Paul L.}, title = {Childism as Vestiges of Infanticide}, series = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 28 (2000), pp. 541-556.}, journal = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 28 (2000), pp. 541-556.}, language = {en} } @misc{Alfonso, author = {Alfonso, Cesar A.}, title = {Review Stephen A. Mitchell: Influence and Autonomy in Psychoanalysis}, series = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 28 (2000), pp. 557-559.}, journal = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 28 (2000), pp. 557-559.}, language = {en} } @article{Altman, author = {Altman, Neil}, title = {Reply to Commentaries}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 10 (2000), pp. 589-605.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 10 (2000), pp. 589-605.}, abstract = {This paper begins with an analysis of race as a social construction and then follows the argument that, at a deep structural level, race and racism are organized by the same rational-irrational polarity of Enlightenment philosophy that informs psychoanalytic structural theory. The heart of the paper is formed by two case examples, one from my own practice and one from Leary (1997). I argue that unconscious racism is to be expected in our clinical work at this point in history and that truly reparative efforts depend on an acknowledgement of racism in the transference-countertransference matrix.}, language = {en} } @article{Altman, author = {Altman, Neil}, title = {Reply to commentaries by Kindler and Shapiro}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 10 (2000), pp. 633-638.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 10 (2000), pp. 633-638.}, language = {en} } @article{Anderson, author = {Anderson, Kevin}, title = {Erich Fromm and the Franfurt School Critique of Criminal Justice}, series = {K. Anderson and R. Quinnes, Eds.), Erich Fromm and Critical Criminology. Beyond the Punitive Society, with two Essays by Erich Fromm, Urbana and Chicago (University of Illinois Press) 2000, pp. 83-119.}, journal = {K. Anderson and R. Quinnes, Eds.), Erich Fromm and Critical Criminology. Beyond the Punitive Society, with two Essays by Erich Fromm, Urbana and Chicago (University of Illinois Press) 2000, pp. 83-119.}, language = {en} } @misc{AndersonQuinney, author = {Anderson, Kevin and Quinney, R.}, title = {Preface}, series = {K. Anderson and R. Quinney, Eds.), Erich Fromm and Critical Criminology. Beyond the Punitive Society, with two Essays by Erich Fromm, Urbana and Chicago (University of Illinois Press) 2000, pp. VII-X.}, journal = {K. Anderson and R. Quinney, Eds.), Erich Fromm and Critical Criminology. Beyond the Punitive Society, with two Essays by Erich Fromm, Urbana and Chicago (University of Illinois Press) 2000, pp. VII-X.}, language = {en} } @article{Angel, author = {Angel, Valerie Tate}, title = {Transsubjectivity: The Space where Psychoanalysis and Architecture Meet}, series = {International Forum of Psychoanalysis, Oslo (Scandinavian University Press) Vol. 9 (No. 1-2, April 2000), pp. 76-83.}, journal = {International Forum of Psychoanalysis, Oslo (Scandinavian University Press) Vol. 9 (No. 1-2, April 2000), pp. 76-83.}, abstract = {The use of space as an image for engagement is the framework of the dialogue between architect, Richard Meier, and psychoanalyst, Valerie Tate Angel. The interrelated nature of architecture and psychoanalysis heightens the awareness of experience in the self's relation to intimate spaces.The homogeneity between architecture and psychoanalysis is the bringing together of a sense of openness and a freedom of possibilities in the place where one lives.}, language = {en} } @article{Anonymus2000, author = {Anonymus-2000,}, title = {Encyclopaedia Britannica, London. Typoscript taken from the Internet, 2 p.}, language = {en} } @article{Aron, author = {Aron, Lewis}, title = {Reflections on White Racism}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 10 (2000), pp. 231-245.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 10 (2000), pp. 231-245.}, abstract = {An essential principle of psychoanalytic practice is the maintenance of strict confidentiality, and yet the presentation and publication of psychoanalytic case histories necessitate considerable public disclosure of the lives of our patients. Inasmuch as psychoanalysis is a particularly frequent, intensive, and lengthy process, a report of the unfolding of an analysis necessarily entails considerable revelation concerning patients, their inner worlds, and their life circumstances. This use of confidential material raises innumerable ethical concerns, and psychoanalysis, with its unique emphasis on unconscious mental processes, also adds to the complexity of ethical considerations by demanding that we take unconscious factors into account. When we speak, for example, of >informed consent< as an ethical principle, we as psychoanalytic clinicians must grapple with the problem of whether to take a patient's manifest acquiescence at face value. This article explores such ethical considerations along with other ethical and clinical complications in the presentation of analytic material for professional purposes.}, language = {en} }