@article{RohdeDachser, author = {Rohde Dachser, Christa}, title = {The Struggle for Empathy—Attempting to Interpret Masochistic Phantasy Enactments}, series = {International Forum of Psychoanalysis, Oslo (Scandinavian University Press) Vol. 8 (No. 2, October 1999), pp. 115-124.}, journal = {International Forum of Psychoanalysis, Oslo (Scandinavian University Press) Vol. 8 (No. 2, October 1999), pp. 115-124.}, abstract = {Masochistic fantasy staging can be seen as a creation of the ego in order to compensate for a psychic structural deficit that stems from being deprived of sufficient empathetic mirroring in early childhood. It consists in the inability to establish an internal empathetic object as a stable psychic structure. Using case-studies vignettes, it is shown how as a result struggle for empathy can become the central live theme and coincide with ?perverse? masochistic fantasies. After a short review of the most important traditional attempts to interpret masochism, the author delineates the communicative meaning of masochistic fantasies, which are composed of the complementary roles of the sufferer, the tormentor and the spectator. By this means the patient creates an inner scene which is apt to serve as a mirror for the experience of psychic pain and to represent the preverbal childhood trauma in a symbolic way. During analysis, this inner scene is shifted to the therapeutic relationship where different roles are kept ready for the analyst: the sadistic adversary; the unobtrusive witness of psychic pain and the role of an answering, reacting object. The relevance of these roles in therapy is examined. It is also shown how by somatisation of psychic pain the struggle toward empathy can be transferred to the stage of somatic medicine with the risk of provoking there a reaction referring solely to the body of the patient.}, language = {en} } @article{Rodrigues, author = {Rodrigues, J.}, title = {IFPS-Is there a Difference?}, series = {International Forum of Psychoanalysis, Oslo (Scandinavian University Press) Vol. 8 (No. 3, December 1999), pp. 268-272.}, journal = {International Forum of Psychoanalysis, Oslo (Scandinavian University Press) Vol. 8 (No. 3, December 1999), pp. 268-272.}, abstract = {This paper tries to answer a question about the difference between IFPS and other psychoanalytical institutions. The author states that there is a linkage between the ethics of psychoanalysis and the ethics of the institution. The ethics can not be represented by rules or standards of prerequisites, but by creating a space where the unconscious as desire, singularity and difference takes place. The bureaucratic organization and the hierarchy in the categories of members of IPA institutions goes straight against the transgressor experience of the unconscious. The training analysis under such conditions leads to an identification process with the training analyst, giving as final result standardized, homogeneous, obedient analysts. The author describes a new experience in the training of analysts in his institution without any kind of interference from IFPS. Finally, he concludes that differences exists between the two institutions and that they are mainly due to the identification process typical for IPA and the process of ''choice'' in IFPS.}, language = {en} } @article{Rendon, author = {Rendon, M.}, title = {Interpretation in the Context of Supervision}, series = {International Forum of Psychoanalysis, Oslo (Scandinavian University Press) Vol. 8 (No. 3, December 1999), pp. 234-242.}, journal = {International Forum of Psychoanalysis, Oslo (Scandinavian University Press) Vol. 8 (No. 3, December 1999), pp. 234-242.}, abstract = {The author looks into the issue of interpretation and traces its evolution both from mere opinion, and from the point of view of the historical development of hermeneutics. In supervision interpretive dissonance may occur at several levels starting with the patient himself as well as his >gatekeepers<, and going up to the supervisor. The relationship between interpretation and supervision is examined in this context, taking into consideration the subjective and intersubjective levels of scientific inquiry. Supervision enhances the complexity of interpretation by introducing yet a third subjectivity that questions the supervisee's interpretation. This has advantages and shortcomings, as supervisors are not always aware that it is ultimately in the supervisee-patient situation where hypotheses are tested and confirmed. Theory alone cannot supersede the intersubjective situation. It is pointed out that psychoanalytic curricula should be reexamined in order to include semiotic science and its application to interpretation and supervision.}, language = {en} } @article{Reiners, author = {Reiners, I.}, title = {Heikot, onnelliset ja vainotut. Theodor W Adornon antisemitismitulkinta}, series = {O.-P. Moisio (Ed.), Kritiikin Lupaus. Nakokulmia Frankfurtin koulun kriittiseen teoriaan, Jyvaeskylaen (SoPhi Publisher) 1999, pp. 215-235.}, journal = {O.-P. Moisio (Ed.), Kritiikin Lupaus. Nakokulmia Frankfurtin koulun kriittiseen teoriaan, Jyvaeskylaen (SoPhi Publisher) 1999, pp. 215-235.}, language = {fi} } @article{ReinertWehr, author = {Reinert, G. B. and Wehr, H.}, title = {Gewalt und Gewaltpr{\"a}vention in der Schule}, series = {S. Baeuerle et al. 1999: Gewalt in der Schule, Donauw{\"o}rth (Auer Verlag) 1999, pp. 68-141.}, journal = {S. Baeuerle et al. 1999: Gewalt in der Schule, Donauw{\"o}rth (Auer Verlag) 1999, pp. 68-141.}, language = {de} } @article{Reck, author = {Reck, S.}, title = {Anmerkungen des Moderators im Workshop >Moralische Entwicklung und Motivation von Kindern<}, series = {Humanismus aktuell. Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Kultur und Weltanschauung, ed. by Humanistische Akademie Berlin, Berlin Sonderheft 2, 1999, pp. 98-99.}, journal = {Humanismus aktuell. Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Kultur und Weltanschauung, ed. by Humanistische Akademie Berlin, Berlin Sonderheft 2, 1999, pp. 98-99.}, language = {de} } @article{Puddu, author = {Puddu, R.}, title = {Discussion of Petri Meronen's paper >The Return of Narcissism: Heinz Kohut in the Context of the History of Ideas<}, series = {International Forum of Psychoanalysis, Oslo (Scandinavian University Press) Vol. 8 (No. 3, December 1999), pp. 221-226.}, journal = {International Forum of Psychoanalysis, Oslo (Scandinavian University Press) Vol. 8 (No. 3, December 1999), pp. 221-226.}, abstract = {Kohut's major contribution to psychoanalysis was in his systematizing a clinical approach to disorders of the self. Kohut's theoretical innovations, however, are often misunderstood for a variety of reasons, as evidenced in Dr. Meronen's paper, >The Return of Narcissism: Heinz Kohut in Historical Context<. Through redressing some of Dr. Meronen's misunderstandings of self psychological theory and his subsequent conclusions, I attempt to clarify in this discussion Kohut's sweeping technical innovations and the theory from which they are derived, all of which are reflective of Kohut's fundamentally personal vision of the essential nature of man.}, language = {en} } @article{PreussLausitz, author = {Preuss Lausitz, U.}, title = {Sozialisationswiderspr{\"u}che heutiger Kinder und M{\"o}glichkeiten der Wertebildung in der modernen Schule}, series = {Humanismus aktuell. Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Kultur und Weltanschauung, ed. by Humanistische Akademie Berlin, Berlin Sonderheft 2, 1999, pp. 100-110.}, journal = {Humanismus aktuell. Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Kultur und Weltanschauung, ed. by Humanistische Akademie Berlin, Berlin Sonderheft 2, 1999, pp. 100-110.}, language = {de} } @article{PradodeOliveira, author = {Prado de Oliveira, L. E.}, title = {Little Jeremy's Struggle with Autism, Schizophrenia and Paranoia}, series = {International Forum of Psychoanalysis, Oslo (Scandinavian University Press) Vol. 8 (No. 3, December 1999), pp. 172-188.}, journal = {International Forum of Psychoanalysis, Oslo (Scandinavian University Press) Vol. 8 (No. 3, December 1999), pp. 172-188.}, abstract = {Since its formulation by Bleuler in 1911, the generalisation of the term >autism<, mainly due to its use by Kanner in 1943 and its remake by authors of Kleinian inspiration, implies problems which mislead us, blurring our perception and understanding of clinical realities. Our psychoanalytical possibilities can be enlarged by a clear knowledge of the history of psychoanalysis, a dynamic approach to psychiatric classification and to problems related to our conception of the setting. On the basis of a case history the author shows how a child and its family worked through major autistic symptoms and proposes new approaches to some psychoanalytical concepts.}, language = {en} } @article{Plaut, author = {Plaut, E. A.}, title = {Marx on Suicide in the Context of His Other Views on Suicide and of His Life,}, series = {E. A. Plaut and K. Anderson (Eds.), Marx on Suizide, Evanston (Northwestern University Press) 1999, pp. 29-40.}, journal = {E. A. Plaut and K. Anderson (Eds.), Marx on Suizide, Evanston (Northwestern University Press) 1999, pp. 29-40.}, language = {en} }