@article{Kremer, author = {Kremer, Renate}, title = {Frieda Fromm-Reichmann (1889-1957). Ein koscheres Sanatorium in Heidelberg als >intellektuelles Experiment<}, series = {M- Bitterolf et al. (Eds.), Intellektuelle in Heidelberg 1910-1933. Ein Lesebuch, ed by Markus Bitterolf, Oliver Schlaudt und Stefan Sch{\"o}bel, Heidelberg (Verlag Stefan Sch{\"o}bel) 2014, pp. 119-128.}, journal = {M- Bitterolf et al. (Eds.), Intellektuelle in Heidelberg 1910-1933. Ein Lesebuch, ed by Markus Bitterolf, Oliver Schlaudt und Stefan Sch{\"o}bel, Heidelberg (Verlag Stefan Sch{\"o}bel) 2014, pp. 119-128.}, language = {de} } @article{Koch, author = {Koch, Patrick B.}, title = {Ein verschollener j{\"u}discher Mystiker? - Gershom Scholems Nachforschungen zu Ephraim Joseph Hirschfeld}, series = {G. Necker, E. Morlok, M. Morgenstern, 2014: Gershom Sholem in Deutschland. Zwischen Seelenverwandtschaft und Sprachlosigkeit, T{\"u}bingen (Mohr Siebeck) 2014, pp. 219-242.}, journal = {G. Necker, E. Morlok, M. Morgenstern, 2014: Gershom Sholem in Deutschland. Zwischen Seelenverwandtschaft und Sprachlosigkeit, T{\"u}bingen (Mohr Siebeck) 2014, pp. 219-242.}, language = {de} } @article{Jefferson, author = {Jefferson, Tony}, title = {Racial Hatred and Racial Prejudice: A Difference that Makes a Difference}, series = {L. Chancer and J. Andrews (Eds.), The Unhappy Divorce of Sociology and Psychoanalysis. Diverse Perspectives on the Psychosocial (Studies in the Psychosocial, ed. by Peter Redman), New York (Palgrave Macmillan) 2014, pp. 359-379.}, journal = {L. Chancer and J. Andrews (Eds.), The Unhappy Divorce of Sociology and Psychoanalysis. Diverse Perspectives on the Psychosocial (Studies in the Psychosocial, ed. by Peter Redman), New York (Palgrave Macmillan) 2014, pp. 359-379.}, language = {en} } @article{Jansen, author = {Jansen, Peter-Erwin}, title = {Die Weltrevolution steht um die Ecke - Leo L{\"o}wenthal in Heidelberg}, series = {M- Bitterolf et al. (Eds.), Intellektuelle in Heidelberg 1910-1933. Ein Lesebuch, ed by Markus Bitterolf, Oliver Schlaudt und Stefan Sch{\"o}bel, Heidelberg (Verlag Stefan Sch{\"o}bel) 2014, pp. 189-202.}, journal = {M- Bitterolf et al. (Eds.), Intellektuelle in Heidelberg 1910-1933. Ein Lesebuch, ed by Markus Bitterolf, Oliver Schlaudt und Stefan Sch{\"o}bel, Heidelberg (Verlag Stefan Sch{\"o}bel) 2014, pp. 189-202.}, language = {de} } @article{Herrmann, author = {Herrmann, Klaus}, title = {Gershom Scholems Weg zur Kabbala}, series = {G. Necker, E. Morlok, M. Morgenstern, 2014: Gershom Sholem in Deutschland. Zwischen Seelenverwandtschaft und Sprachlosigkeit, T{\"u}bingen (Mohr Siebeck) 2014, pp. 037-071.}, journal = {G. Necker, E. Morlok, M. Morgenstern, 2014: Gershom Sholem in Deutschland. Zwischen Seelenverwandtschaft und Sprachlosigkeit, T{\"u}bingen (Mohr Siebeck) 2014, pp. 037-071.}, language = {de} } @misc{Frie, author = {Frie, Roger}, title = {What is Cultural Psychoanalysis? Psychoanalytic Anthropology and the Interpersonal Tradition}, series = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 50 (2014), pp. 371-394.}, journal = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 50 (2014), pp. 371-394.}, abstract = {In light of the recent emphasis on social and cultural factors in psychoanalytic theory and practice, this article will elaborate earlier attempts to bridge psychoanalysis and the study of culture. I begin by considering the disciplinary tension between the fields of psychoanalysis and anthropology and the emergence of a >psychoanalytic anthropology,< which began in the 1920s and lasted through the 1950s. I then turn to the works of Harry Stack Sullivan and Erich Fromm, who developed an approach known as >cultural psychoanalysis.< I suggest that Sullivan and Fromm anticipate today's sociocultural turn in psychoanalysis and that their work on culture and its role in psychological development and experience continues to be relevant. Rather than embracing a social or cultural determinism, Sullivan and Fromm focus on the interaction between culture and the person, thus creating an >integrationist< approach. Sullivan and Fromm develop a broad conception of culture that encompasses a critique of social and cultural norms and values. I suggest that this is particularly valuable because much current discussion of culture focuses chiefly on diversity and difference, thus overlooking the implicit social and cultural values at work in all human experience. I build on Sullivan and Fromm's insights to illustrate the significance of early interpersonal psychoanalysis for the sociocultural turn in contemporary psychoanalytic theory and practice.}, language = {en} } @article{Engel, author = {Engel, Amir}, title = {Gershom Scholems >Kabbala und Mythos< jenseits deutsch-j{\"u}discher Romantik}, series = {G. Necker, E. Morlok, M. Morgenstern, 2014: Gershom Sholem in Deutschland. Zwischen Seelenverwandtschaft und Sprachlosigkeit, T{\"u}bingen (Mohr Siebeck) 2014, pp. 203-217.}, journal = {G. Necker, E. Morlok, M. Morgenstern, 2014: Gershom Sholem in Deutschland. Zwischen Seelenverwandtschaft und Sprachlosigkeit, T{\"u}bingen (Mohr Siebeck) 2014, pp. 203-217.}, language = {de} } @article{Elliott, author = {Elliott, Anthony}, title = {On the Melancholia of New Individualism}, series = {L. Chancer and J. Andrews (Eds.), The Unhappy Divorce of Sociology and Psychoanalysis. Diverse Perspectives on the Psychosocial (Studies in the Psychosocial, ed. by Peter Redman), New York (Palgrave Macmillan) 2014, pp. 317-337.}, journal = {L. Chancer and J. Andrews (Eds.), The Unhappy Divorce of Sociology and Psychoanalysis. Diverse Perspectives on the Psychosocial (Studies in the Psychosocial, ed. by Peter Redman), New York (Palgrave Macmillan) 2014, pp. 317-337.}, language = {en} } @article{DeGloma, author = {DeGloma, Thomas}, title = {The Unconscious in Cultural Dispute: On the Ethics of Psychosocial Discovery}, series = {L. Chancer and J. Andrews (Eds.), The Unhappy Divorce of Sociology and Psychoanalysis. Diverse Perspectives on the Psychosocial (Studies in the Psychosocial, ed. by Peter Redman), New York (Palgrave Macmillan) 2014, pp. 77-97.}, journal = {L. Chancer and J. Andrews (Eds.), The Unhappy Divorce of Sociology and Psychoanalysis. Diverse Perspectives on the Psychosocial (Studies in the Psychosocial, ed. by Peter Redman), New York (Palgrave Macmillan) 2014, pp. 77-97.}, language = {en} } @article{Chodorow, author = {Chodorow, Nancy J.}, title = {Why Is It Easy to Be a Psychoanalyst and a Feminist, But Not a Psychoanalyst and a Social Scientist? Reflections of a Psychoanalytic Hybrid}, series = {L. Chancer and J. Andrews (Eds.), The Unhappy Divorce of Sociology and Psychoanalysis. Diverse Perspectives on the Psychosocial (Studies in the Psychosocial, ed. by Peter Redman), New York (Palgrave Macmillan) 2014, pp. 122-139.}, journal = {L. Chancer and J. Andrews (Eds.), The Unhappy Divorce of Sociology and Psychoanalysis. Diverse Perspectives on the Psychosocial (Studies in the Psychosocial, ed. by Peter Redman), New York (Palgrave Macmillan) 2014, pp. 122-139.}, language = {en} }