@article{Conci, author = {Conci, Marco}, title = {Working with Italian patients in Munich - The case of Penelope}, series = {International Forum of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 27 (No. 1, 2018), pp. 024-034.}, journal = {International Forum of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 27 (No. 1, 2018), pp. 024-034.}, abstract = {With their book Psychoanalytic perspectives on migration and exile (1989), L. Grinberg and R. Grinberg (1984) opened up a new clinical field, which had been neglected for a long time in the psychoanalytic community, although Freud's multilinguistic competence had greatly contributed to the creation of psychoanalysis. With their book The Babel of the unconscious, Jacqueline Amati Mehler, Simona Argentieri, and Jorge Canestri were able to confirm the hypothesis that it is possible to help multilingual patients to integrate the different aspects of their self which are bound to their mother tongue and to their foreign tongue(s), and thus to allow them to develop a new identity. The author, who has been a psychoanalyst in Munich since 1999, works every day with his Italian patients in this new clinical field, that is in their common mother tongue and at the two levels of their old Italian and their new German identity. Through the detailed presentation of a clinical case, he furthermore shows how, on the one hand, the migration creates a new space in which therapy actually becomes possible, and on the other hand, not only therapy, but also the kind of relationship developed by the patients to their >new country< plays a decisive role in the whole process. Such a frame proved to be particularly good for the emergence, revisitation, and reelaboration of the transgenerational trauma around which the case of Penelope is centered. The author further assumes that the theme of >migration and identity< is becoming more and more important in our globalized world, with clinical consequences whose elaboration requires a specific cultural and technical preparation.}, language = {en} } @article{Conci, author = {Conci, Marco}, title = {Wilfred Bion's identity as a psychoanalyst in the light of his letters (1939-1951) to his first analyst, John Rickman, and of their multidimensional relationship - Our trainings (and our lives), our letters, and the history, transmission and practice of p}, series = {International Forum of Psychoanalysis Oslo (Scandinavian University Press), Vol. 20 (No. 2, June 2011), pp. 63-67.}, journal = {International Forum of Psychoanalysis Oslo (Scandinavian University Press), Vol. 20 (No. 2, June 2011), pp. 63-67.}, language = {en} } @article{Conci, author = {Conci, Marco}, title = {Why did Freud choose medical school?}, series = {International Forum of Psychoanalysis, Oslo (Scandinavian University Press), Vol. 5 (No. 2, June 1996), pp. 123-132.}, journal = {International Forum of Psychoanalysis, Oslo (Scandinavian University Press), Vol. 5 (No. 2, June 1996), pp. 123-132.}, language = {en} } @article{Conci, author = {Conci, Marco}, title = {The Young Freud's Letters to Eduard Silberstein—Early Traces of Some Psychoanalytic Concepts}, series = {International Forum of Psychoanalysis Oslo (Scandinavian University Press), Vol. 1 (No. 1, June 1992), pp. 37-43}, journal = {International Forum of Psychoanalysis Oslo (Scandinavian University Press), Vol. 1 (No. 1, June 1992), pp. 37-43}, language = {en} } @article{Conci, author = {Conci, Marco}, title = {The treatment of schizophrenia and severe psychopathology: its history and current practice in the Washington psychoanalytic community. Typescript, 5 pp.}, language = {en} } @article{Conci, author = {Conci, Marco}, title = {Sullivan and the intersubjective perspective. Paper presented in Athens on Saturday October 23, 2010, in the context of the XVI Forum of the IFPS, 8 pp. [Cf. Conci, M., 2013]}, abstract = {The author sees H.S. Sullivan's (1892-1949) interpersonal theory as the best theoretical framework for the contemporary intersubjective perspective in psychoanalysis and presents the former in its pluridimensional articulation. After having extended Freud's therapeutic approach to psychotic patients, Sullivan developed both a developmental psychology and a psychoanalytic and psychotherapeutic technique based on the >interpersonal field< as the basic unit of study. To the pluridimensional character of his theory also belongs its application to the cultural and social aspects of our personal identity. Having the contemporary psychoanalytic authors who shaped the intersubjective perspective limited themselves to the clinical dimension, Sullivan's interpersonal theory can still provide the theoretical framework that any psychoanalytic perspective needs.}, language = {en} } @article{Conci, author = {Conci, Marco}, title = {Sullivan and the intersubjective perspective}, series = {International Forum of Psychoanalysis, Abingdon (Routledge - Taylor and Francis) Vol. 22 (No. 1, 2013), pp. 10-16.}, journal = {International Forum of Psychoanalysis, Abingdon (Routledge - Taylor and Francis) Vol. 22 (No. 1, 2013), pp. 10-16.}, abstract = {The author sees H.S. Sullivan's (1892-1949) interpersonal theory as the best theoretical framework for the contemporary intersubjective perspective in psychoanalysis and presents the former in its pluridimensional articulation. After having extended Freud's therapeutic approach to psychotic patients, Sullivan developed both a developmental psychology and a psychoanalytic and psychotherapeutic technique based on the >interpersonal field< as the basic unit of study. To the pluridimensional character of his theory also belongs its application to the cultural and social aspects of our personal identity. Having the contemporary psychoanalytic authors who shaped the intersubjective perspective limited themselves to the clinical dimension, Sullivan's interpersonal theory can still provide the theoretical framework that any psychoanalytic perspective needs.}, language = {en} } @misc{Conci, author = {Conci, Marco}, title = {Review Usak-Sahin, H., Psychoanalyse in der T{\"u}rkei. Eine historische und aktuelle Spurensuche}, series = {International Forum of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 30 (No. 1, 2021), pp. 071-072.}, journal = {International Forum of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 30 (No. 1, 2021), pp. 071-072.}, language = {en} } @misc{Conci, author = {Conci, Marco}, title = {Review Roazen, Paul:, Eduardo Weiss}, series = {International Forum of Psychoanalysis, Basingstoke (Routledge - Taylor and Francis) Vol. 15 (No. 1, March 2006), pp. 58-62.}, journal = {International Forum of Psychoanalysis, Basingstoke (Routledge - Taylor and Francis) Vol. 15 (No. 1, March 2006), pp. 58-62.}, language = {en} } @misc{Conci, author = {Conci, Marco}, title = {Review Roazen, Paul: How Freud worked}, series = {International Forum of Psychoanalysis, Oslo (Scandinavian University Press), Vol. 5 (No. 2, June 1996), pp. 151-153.}, journal = {International Forum of Psychoanalysis, Oslo (Scandinavian University Press), Vol. 5 (No. 2, June 1996), pp. 151-153.}, language = {en} }