@article{Ffytche, author = {Ffytche, Matt}, title = {Psychoanalytic sociology and the traumas of history: Alexander Mitscherlich between the disciplines}, series = {History of the Human Sciences, Vol. 30, No. 5 (2017), pp. 3-29. [Online ISSN 1461-720X] [doi.org/10.1177/0952695117706872]}, journal = {History of the Human Sciences, Vol. 30, No. 5 (2017), pp. 3-29. [Online ISSN 1461-720X] [doi.org/10.1177/0952695117706872]}, abstract = {This article examines the way aspects of recent history were excluded in key studies emerging from psychoanalytic social psychology of the mid-20th century. It draws on work by Erikson, Marcuse and Fromm, but focuses in particular on Alexander Mitscherlich. Mitscherlich, a social psychologist associated with the later Frankfurt School, was also the most important psychoanalytic figure in postwar Germany. This makes his work significant for tracing ways in which historical experience of the war and Nazism was filtered out of psychosocial narratives in this period, in favour of more structural analyses of the dynamics of social authority. Mitscherlich's 1967 work >The Inability to Mourn<, co-authored with Margarete Mitscherlich, is often cited as the point at which the 'missing' historical experience flooded back into psychoanalytic accounts of society. I argue that this landmark publication does not hail the shift towards the psychoanalysis of historical experience with which it is often associated. These more sociological writers of the mid-century were writing before the impact of several trends occurring in the 1980s-90s which decisively shifted psychoanalytic attention away from the investigation of social authority and towards a focus on historical trauma. Ultimately this is also a narrative about the transformations which occur when psychoanalysis moves across disciplines.}, language = {en} }