@article{Cong, author = {Cong, Juan}, title = {Walking out of the Opposite of Love and Civilization——Fromm's Criticism of Freud's Concept of Love and Its Enlightenment [走出情爱与文明的二律背反—弗罗姆对弗洛伊德爱情观的批判及对我们的启示]}, series = {Theory Horizon [理论界], No. 9 (2006), pp. 120-121.}, journal = {Theory Horizon [理论界], No. 9 (2006), pp. 120-121.}, abstract = {弗洛伊德与弗洛姆对情爱与文明的关系问题做出了针锋相对的解读。弗洛伊德从自然与文明的对立性出发主张全盘消除文明对欲望和"天性"的压抑,弗洛姆则从自然与人类境况的对立统一出发,认为性本能使人对爱情的渴望及与人结合的表现。二者都有自足性的理由也都存在着某些不可克服的内在矛盾。人类作为自然与文明的双重存在,必须走出情爱(欲望)与文明(道德)的二律背反。}, language = {zh} } @article{Cong, author = {Cong, Juan}, title = {An Analytical Look at >The Art of Loving< - A New Understanding to Erich Fromm's >The Art of Loving< [>爱的艺术<的深层探索——弗洛姆《爱的艺术》的重新解读]}, series = {Journal of Hanshan Normal University [韩山师范学院学报], No. 4 (2005), pp. 30-34.}, journal = {Journal of Hanshan Normal University [韩山师范学院学报], No. 4 (2005), pp. 30-34.}, abstract = {E. Fromm paid special attention to two kinds of love, namely, care and affection or the erotic sexual nature of love. He thought that without understanding care and affection, one's expectation of love could not be totally satisfied either. So he took personal understanding and knowledge of what other people truly wanted and needed as the basis of love. In his opinion, sexual passion alone, without respect, is not true love. Fromm's view is certainly relevant to the way we live our life today.}, language = {zh} }