@article{Sauka, author = {Sauka, Anne}, title = {Būt vai piederēt? Miesbūšana un inscenētā dzīve. Paper presented at Fromma konference „Brīvība un brīvības: iespējas un draudi" Norises laiks 10. un 11. maijs 2013, 6 pp.}, language = {mul} } @article{Sauka, author = {Sauka, Anne}, title = {Sein oder Haben? Leibsein und das inszenierte Leben}, series = {Fromm Forum (Deutsche Ausgabe - ISSN 1437-0956), 18 / 2014, Tuebingen (Selbstverlag), pp. 63-66.}, volume = {d18/2014q}, journal = {Fromm Forum (Deutsche Ausgabe - ISSN 1437-0956), 18 / 2014, Tuebingen (Selbstverlag), pp. 63-66.}, language = {de} } @article{Sauka, author = {Sauka, Anne}, title = {The Nature of Our Becoming: Genealogical Perspectives}, series = {Le foucaldien, Vol. 6 (No. 1, 2020), pp. 1-30.}, journal = {Le foucaldien, Vol. 6 (No. 1, 2020), pp. 1-30.}, abstract = {In the light of Philipp Sarasin's work in Darwin und Foucault: Genealogie und Geschichte im Zeitalter der Biologie, the article delineates a genealogically articulated naturally produced culture and a cultured nature and discusses the genealogical implications of a carnal, becoming self in a world that could rightly be justified >as an aesthetical phenomenon.< The article demonstrates the historicity and processual materiality as a conceptual platform for a combination of the notions of experienced carnality and a socially constructed body, demonstrating such a historically embedded carnal body as a binding agent for the >social constructivist< and >biologist< approaches in sciences. Thus, the article builds a framework for the articulation of senseful, processual materiality on the backdrop of a nature-culture continuum via genealogy, suggesting the necessity for change of tone in the communication of human and life sciences via the understanding of a culturally endowed biology.}, language = {en} } @article{Sauka, author = {Sauka, Anne}, title = {Life in Process: The Lived-Body Ethics for Future (with a summary in Latvian: Dzīvība procesā: miesiskās patības ētika nākotnei, pp. 181-183)}, series = {Reliģiski-filozofiski raksti, Vol. 28, pp. 154-183.}, journal = {Reliģiski-filozofiski raksti, Vol. 28, pp. 154-183.}, abstract = {The article explores the concept of >life< via processual ontology, contrasting the approaches of substance and processual ontologies, and investigates the link between ontological assumptions and sociopolitical discourses, stating that the predominant substance ontologies also promote an objectifying and anthropocentric framework in sociopolitical discourses and ethical approaches. Arguing for a necessary shift in the ontological conceptualization of life to enable environmentally-minded ethics for the future, the article explores the tie between the sociopolitical discourses embedded in a worldview that is grounded in substance ontology and ethical frameworks. Whilst affirming this tie, this study also explicates the limitations and potential feasibility of a processual understanding of life, in the context of the existential disposition of the self-alienated lived-body self that is ontologically predisposed to objectification as a necessary pre-condition to human self-awareness.}, language = {en} } @article{Sauka, author = {Sauka, Anne}, title = {A lack of meaning? Reactive nihilism and processual materiality}, series = {Approaching Religion, Vol. 10 (No. 2, November 2020), pp. 125-140.}, journal = {Approaching Religion, Vol. 10 (No. 2, November 2020), pp. 125-140.}, abstract = {This article explores the >lack of meaning< in contemporary society as a consequence of Western dualist thought paradigms and ontologies, via Gilles Deleuze's concept of >reactivenihilism< following the colloquial murder of God. The article then explores processual and new materialist approaches in the understanding of the lived and carnal self, arguing for immanent and senseful materiality as an ethical platform for religious, environmental, and societal solidarity for tomorrow. For the theoretical justification of the processual approach in understanding the enfleshed self, the article employs John Dupr{\´e}'s processual approach in the philosophy of biology, as well as Astrida Neimani's critical posthumanism, and contextualizes these considerations with Erich Fromm's ethical distinction of being and having.}, language = {en} } @article{Sauka, author = {Sauka, Anne}, title = {>Būt< un >piederēt< miesiskās patības ētikas kontekstā}, series = {I. Suvajevs (Ed.), Begsana no brivibas? Erihs Fromms un Latjija, Riga (University of Latvia, Institute of Philosophy and Sociology) 2014, pp. 93-107.}, journal = {I. Suvajevs (Ed.), Begsana no brivibas? Erihs Fromms un Latjija, Riga (University of Latvia, Institute of Philosophy and Sociology) 2014, pp. 93-107.}, language = {mul} }