@article{Hirsch, author = {Hirsch, Irwin}, title = {Sexual Disorders: A Perspective}, series = {The American Journal of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 46 (1986), pp. 239-248.}, journal = {The American Journal of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 46 (1986), pp. 239-248.}, language = {en} } @article{Hirsch, author = {Hirsch, Irwin}, title = {A response to Davies (but not the last word)}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 02 (1992), pp. 191-203.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 02 (1992), pp. 191-203.}, language = {en} } @article{Hirsch, author = {Hirsch, Irwin}, title = {Reflections on Clinical Issues in the Context of the National Trauma of September 11.}, series = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 39 (2003), pp. 665-682.}, journal = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 39 (2003), pp. 665-682.}, language = {en} } @article{Hirsch, author = {Hirsch, Irwin}, title = {Female-Male, Doctor-Patient: Discussion of Seward.}, series = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 39 (2003), pp. 223-232.}, journal = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 39 (2003), pp. 223-232.}, language = {en} } @article{Hirsch, author = {Hirsch, Irwin}, title = {Interpersonal Psychoanalysis' Radical Fa{\c{c}}ade}, series = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 30 (2002), pp. 595-604.}, journal = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 30 (2002), pp. 595-604.}, language = {en} } @article{Hirsch, author = {Hirsch, Irwin}, title = {An Illustration of the Irreducible Subjectivity in Interpreting Data - Clinical or Written: A Reply to Philip Bromberg}, series = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 30 (2002), pp. 621-632.}, journal = {The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, Vol. 30 (2002), pp. 621-632.}, language = {en} } @article{Hirsch, author = {Hirsch, Irwin}, title = {Beyond Interpretation: Analytic Interaction in the Interpersonal Tradition.}, series = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 38 (2002), pp. 573-588.}, journal = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 38 (2002), pp. 573-588.}, language = {en} } @article{Hirsch, author = {Hirsch, Irwin}, title = {Reply to Mitchell}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 11 (2001), pp. 115-126.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 11 (2001), pp. 115-126.}, abstract = {Every new theoretical development in psychoanalysis tends to lead to counter trends or calls for a return to a more pure version of analysis. Some critics of psychoanalysis' relational turn view this theorizing as excessively interpersonal, using the most literal definition of this latter perspective - psychoanalysis as simply an I - Thou relationship between two conscious people. Jeanne Wolff Bernstein, for example, starts with the assumption that unconscious minds can be studied independently from those persons engaged in the study. It then follows for such critics that, in interpersonal/relational analytic action, the person of the analyst has become too central and intrusive in the process, obscuring the examination of patients' unconscious mind.}, language = {en} } @article{Hirsch, author = {Hirsch, Irwin}, title = {Alone yet connected: Response to the discussion.}, series = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 36 (2000), pp. 289-300.}, journal = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 36 (2000), pp. 289-300.}, language = {en} } @article{Hirsch, author = {Hirsch, Irwin}, title = {Interview with Benjamin Wolstein.}, series = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 36 (2000), pp. 187-232.}, journal = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 36 (2000), pp. 187-232.}, language = {en} }