@article{Picart, author = {Picart, Jose}, title = {Escape from Freedom and Neurosis in the Academy}, series = {Change (Taylor and Francis), Vol. 31, No. 4 (Jul. - Aug., 1999), p. 4.}, journal = {Change (Taylor and Francis), Vol. 31, No. 4 (Jul. - Aug., 1999), p. 4.}, language = {en} } @article{Lu, author = {Lu, Yuting}, title = {從心理學觀點看人及宗教 [Man and Religion from a Psychological Perspective]}, series = {哲學與文化 [Philosophy and Culture], Vol. 26 (1999), pp. 1116-1130;1187-1189.}, journal = {哲學與文化 [Philosophy and Culture], Vol. 26 (1999), pp. 1116-1130;1187-1189.}, abstract = {心理學普通不設宗教信仰這一問題,因為兩者的研究對象各有不同之故。但由於心理學所討論的人,是「整體性」的,生理與心理固然不能分離,肉體與精神現象也很難完全分開處理;因此自五十年代以來,某些研究「人之所以為人」之特徵的心理學家,已開始對宗教信仰這一問題發生了興趣。心理學家討論信仰問題,不管他們的背境是什麼,藉通不強調、更不執著某種特定的宗教系統,如佛教、基督教、或天主教,雖然這些心理學家也有他們自己的特定信仰。本文收集了五位較有代表性的心理學家,並計劃從他們不同的立場來討論人與宗教之問題:(一)從成熟的人格觀點來看人之宗教信仰對人之人格成熟有何關連。這裡介紹了兩位心理學家,即亞爾伯之人格理論及梵岡之信仰健康觀。(二)從人生意義之探索看信仰問題。並以意義治療學之創始人以弗蘭克為代言人。(三)從追求道德及靈魂之實有看宗教,以新精神分析學權威佛洛姆為主。(四)從人之自我實現論談宗教信仰,並以此理論之創始人馬斯洛為主要依據。輔大以全人教育為宗旨,並以真善美聖為師生共同追求的目標,但全人教育不設宗教這一問題又如何能成為「全人」。真善美聖的實際內涵又脫不了終極關懷的問題。我們不願以自己的信仰談宗教,雖然我們也有此權利及責任,但畢竟易引起誤會及反感。本各完全以人自己的立場來說信仰,似乎應該易於接受。}, language = {zh} } @article{Auer, author = {Auer, Alfons}, title = {Can There Be Ethics without Religiousness? English version of the paper presented at the Symposium Possibilities of Psychoanalysis: Retrospect and Prospects to Commemorate Erich Fromm's 75th Birthday, given at Locarno May 24/25, 1975, Typescript 8 pp. - [cf. Auer_A_1999a]}, language = {en} } @article{Buechler, author = {Buechler, Sandra}, title = {The Analyst's Experience of Lonelinss}, series = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 34 (1999), pp. 91-113.}, journal = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 34 (1999), pp. 91-113.}, language = {en} } @article{Feng, author = {Feng, Xiating}, title = {A Review of Micropsychoanalysis and Its Methods [微精神分析学及其方法论述评]}, series = {Studies in Dialectics of Nature [自然辩证法研究], No. 1 (1999), pp. 13-14, 12, 15.}, journal = {Studies in Dialectics of Nature [自然辩证法研究], No. 1 (1999), pp. 13-14, 12, 15.}, abstract = {如果把弗洛伊德作为精神分析学派的创始人,视其研究成果为开精神分析学派先河之作,那么,精神分析学派从出现至今,则已历经将近一个世纪的发展过程了。精神分析学派不仅造就了荣格、阿德勒、弗洛姆等世界著名的精神分析学家,而且造就了一大批临床心理学家,甚至可以说...}, language = {zh} } @article{Zyl, author = {Zyl, Sue van}, title = {Outside In: Commentary on Paper by Dianne Elise}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 09 (1999), pp. 249-274.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 09 (1999), pp. 249-274.}, language = {en} } @article{ZeddiesRichardson, author = {Zeddies, T. J. and Richardson, F. C.}, title = {Analytic authority in historical and critical perspective: Beyond objectivism and relativism.}, series = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 35 (1999), pp. 581-602.}, journal = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 35 (1999), pp. 581-602.}, language = {en} } @article{Yerushalmi, author = {Yerushalmi, H.}, title = {Mutual influences in supervision.}, series = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 35 (1999), pp. 415-436.}, journal = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 35 (1999), pp. 415-436.}, language = {en} } @article{WolffBernstein, author = {Wolff Bernstein, Jeanne}, title = {Paradox and process}, series = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 09 (1999), pp. 275-299.}, journal = {Psychoanalytic Dialogues Vol. 09 (1999), pp. 275-299.}, abstract = {In this paper I am tracing the history of countertransference and how it has informed the current debate about self-disclosure as a pivotal instrument of analytic work. Now that the analyst's >subjective factor< has been understood as a central influence on the analysand and as a vital source of information about the analysand's intrapsychic life, I argue that certain currents in the relational school of psychoanalysis confuse the analyst's subjectivity with his personality. While becoming more >real< with a patient may enliven a stale analytic dialogue, it ought not be confused with, or take the place of, an analysis of unconscious desires and phantasies. I claim that a two-person psychology can exist only within a tripartite structure in which the analyst does not lose sight of his complex function of being the carrier, observer, and conveyor of the unconscious currents holding both participants in check.}, language = {en} } @article{Wigren, author = {Wigren, J.}, title = {As hardly killed, as easily wounded: Posttraumatic challenges to the working alliance.}, series = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 35 (1999), pp. 253-270.}, journal = {Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 35 (1999), pp. 253-270.}, language = {en} }