OPUS

  • Home
  • Search
  • Browse
  • Publish
  • Hilfe

Refine

Author

  • Thomas Saalfeld (4)
  • Ursula Hoffmann-Lange (2)
  • Daniel Bischof (1)
  • Jan Pakulski (1)
  • Ralf Dobmeier (1)
  • Simon Fink (1)

Year of publication

  • 2012 (4)
  • 2011 (2)
  • 2013 (1)

Document Type

  • Artikel in einer Zeitschrift / Postprint (5)
  • Artikel in einem Sammelwerk / Postprint (1)
  • Journal (Komplette Ausgabe eines Zeitschriftenheftes) (1)

Language

  • English (7) (remove)

Keywords

  • House of Commons (2)
  • representation (2)
  • Britisches Unterhaus (1)
  • Bundestag (1)
  • Bundestagswahl 2009 (1)
  • Ethnic minorities (1)
  • Germany (1)
  • Great Britain (1)
  • Institutionenvertrauen (1)
  • Parlamentsreform (1)

Institute

  • Lehrstuhl für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft (7) (remove)

7 search hits

search hits 1 to 7

Sort by

  • Year
  • Year
  • Title
  • Title
  • Author
  • Author
Show/Hide Abstract Minority-Ethnic MPs and the Substantive Representation of Minority Interests in the House of Commons, 2005–2011 (2013)
Thomas Saalfeld Daniel Bischof
Black, Asian and minority-ethnic (BAME) citizens are under-represented in the House of Commons. Nevertheless, the Chamber's ethnic composition has become more reflective of the general population as a result of the 2005 and 2010 parliamentary elections. The paper seeks to map and explain variations in the extent to which BAME Members of Parliament (MPs) use the Chamber to articulate issues relevant to minority constituents. We compare the content of all parliamentary questions for written answer asked by BAME MPs between May 2005 and December 2011 to the questions asked by a matching sample of non-minority legislators. We find that BAME MPs ask more questions relating to the problems and rights of ethnic minorities in, and immigration to, the UK. However, we also find that all British MPs are responsive to the interests of minority constituents where these are geographically concentrated. Building on theoretical predictions derived from (a) models focusing on MPs’ political socialisation and (b) on the electoral incentives they are facing, we discover that the MPs in our sample respond systematically to electoral incentives, especially in the politically salient area of immigration policy. While these findings are in line with an ’electoral-incentives model’, whereas a ‘socialisation model’ is better suited to explain the larger number of questions on the interests of ethnic minorities asked by Labour MPs.
Show/Hide Abstract Parliamentary Questions as Instruments of Substantive Representation: Visible Minorities in the UK House of Commons, 2005-10 (2011)
Thomas Saalfeld
Does the growing descriptive representation of minority-ethnic legislators in the British House of Commons have any implications for the substantive representation of minority-related issues in the UK Parliament? This study is based on a data set of over 16,000 parliamentary questions tabled by 50 British backbench Members of Parliament (MPs) in the 2005-2010 Parliament, including the 16 immigrant-origin MPs with a ‘visible-minority’ background. Based on a series of multivariate models, it is found that all British MPs sampled for this study – irrespective of their ethnic status – respond to electoral incentives arising from the socio-demographic composition of their constituencies: Minority and non-minority MPs alike ask more questions relating to minority concerns, if they represent constituencies with a high share of non-White residents. Controlling for that general effect, however, MPs with a visible-minority status do tend to ask significantly more questions about ethnic diversity and equality issues.
A Seemingly Boring Election amidst Economic Turmoil (2011)
Thomas Saalfeld
Show/Hide Abstract Vertical and Horizontal Accountability of Global Elites : Some Theoretical Reflections and a Preliminary Research Agenda (2012)
Ursula Hoffmann-Lange
Globalization has given rise to an ever-increasing number of global elites holding leadership positions in transnational institutions, corporations and NGOs. This raises questions regarding the structure and accountability of these elites. Are they just an abstract category of position-holders representing national or organizational interests in transnational decision-making or do they rather form a cohesive ruling group united by common interests, as some theoreticians of globalization have assumed? Elite theory has identified a number of relevant characteristics that can be used for assessing the nature of this nascent elite formation. These include primarily the prevailing patterns of elite recruitment with respect to the representation of societal diversity, the mechanisms of elite accountability and the existence of informal rules of conduct that enable the accommodation of conflicts of interest.
Show/Hide Abstract Elite foundations of social theory and politics : special issue (2012)
Jan Pakulski Ursula Hoffmann-Lange
This special issue of the HSR is dedicated to John Higley in honour of his continued accomplishment as a distin-guished scholar and prolific author whose seminal publi-cations on the role of elites in politics and society have contributed to the contemporary revival of elite research. The volume assembles contributions from fourteen au-thors, ranging from theoretical analyses to empirical stud-ies of elites in old and new democracies. Proceeding from the emergence of elites with the advent of complex societies, the chapters show the wide application of elite theory in understanding social and political developments. One group of chapters focuses on the continued rele-vance of three classics of elite theory, Max Weber, Gaetano Mosca, and Joseph Schumpeter, which call into question some unrealistically optimistic assumptions of the theory of democratic elitism and egalitarian socialism. Another group addresses post-communist elite transfor-mations and the formation of transnational elites, and demonstrates the relevance of elite studies for under-standing abrupt as well as gradual regime change. A final group of papers discusses the dynamics of elite-mass relations by comparing the attitudes and behaviours of elites to those of mass publics. In addition to these dedicated contributions, the issue also includes reprints of a selection of John Higley’s seminal articles and book chapters.
A Paradigm Change in Innovation Policies? Assessing the Causes and Consequences of Embryo Research Laws (2012)
Simon Fink
Show/Hide Abstract The Bundestag and German Citizens: More Communication, Growing Distance (2012)
Thomas Saalfeld Ralf Dobmeier
This contribution examines how links between citizens and Members of the Bundestag have evolved since 1949. The focus will be on institutional incentives relating to the electoral system and the rules of procedure in the Bundestag. In addition, new incentives arising from technological developments (especially internet and Web 2.0 applications) will be explored in their effect on individual parliamentary behaviour vis-a-vis citizens and in the Bundestag’s ‘corporate’ links (i.e., links not based on electoral incentives in the constituencies and the chamber) with citizens. In particular, the development of petitions and electronic petitions will be assessed. While the evidence presented suggests that Bundestag Members have enhanced communication with citizens, this has not halted the decline in popular support for the House. In line with other advanced liberal democracies, trust in parliament is declining as a result of a more critical, less deferential citizenry.

search hits 1 to 7

OPUS4 Logo

  • Contact
  • Imprint
  • Sitelinks
Login